How bad is my batch ?

jmh33 said:
Didn’t get poked.
Ain’t gonna now!! 🤨
John 😁
Click to expand...
Exactly. My whole family didn't get it. My father was murdered by the hospital because he didn't have it.
 
knarfeng said:
I indirectly know several people who have suddenly developed pulmonary issues within weeks of vaccination and were reported to VARES .
There are enough women who have developed menstrual issues after vaccination that even Yahoo is reporting it. Naturally they are pushing the story that it's not serious.
news.yahoo.com

Women's Periods May Be Late After Coronavirus Vaccination, Study Suggests

Shortly after coronavirus vaccines were rolled out about a year ago, women started reporting erratic menstrual cycles after receiving the shots. Some said their periods were late. Others reported heavier bleeding than usual or painful bleeding. Some postmenopausal women who hadn’t had a period...
news.yahoo.com news.yahoo.com
Let's see how that one plays out over the next few years. It's known that the vaccine does end up in a woman's ovaries.

Three of my direct acquaintances have developed cancer or heart issues within months of vaccination. Insufficient temporal connection, so they were not reported to VARES and in truth, may not be connected. But it makes you think.
Click to expand...
Have lost 4 male friends “unexpectedly” ; 2 died of heart problems while sleeping. Ages 50-60’s. No investigation/autopsy, so no counting.

I’ve translated hours of testimony (German) by top researchers —from before the rollout— and anyone with 2 connected brain cells is going to have serious doubts…but head in sand is easier.
 
It makes me cringe every time I hear that someone gets the booster. They love to tell you to see your reaction and response as to whether or not you got.

I've had quite a few clients die within a week or two of getting it. Perfectly healthy people.

I tell people I've been boosted. It's technically not a lie, as my SUV has a turbo so I'm boosted when I drive!
 
Chefget said:
Thoughts about the shingles vaccine?
Click to expand...
Haven't looked at it. Other than the fact that I had chicken pox as a child, and am over 50, I don't have any of the factors which would increase my risk.
 
Meanwhile, back on point, Here's an interesting presentation by Dr Peter Mccullough. He spends much his presentation discussing documented findings of vaccine injuries. He also touches on the history of the pandemic response, including the attempt to shut down all efforts to treat the sickness. Instead, doctors were instructed to wait for a vaccine, rather than try to treat ill patients. (Can you name another illness in which doctors were ordered not to treat their gatients until they became critical? Those who promoted early treatment of Covid 19 were ostracized and several had their licenses revoked for it. Meanwhile there are now multiple published examples of the effectiveness of Ivermectin, vitamins C & D, and zinc.)

 
Last edited:
Reported for common sense Frank!!

Might have to take your keys to the executive wash room for this!!

I get a kick out of hearing people that got quintuple vaxxed, get covid 4 times then thank God they got the jab. You know the one that will stop them getting it & spreading it.

Lunacy.

knarfeng said:
Meanwhile, back on point, Here's an interesting presentation by Dr Peter Mccullough. He spends much his presentation discussing documented findings of vaccine injuries. He also touches on the history of the pandemic response, including the attempt to shut down all efforts to treat the sickness, and instead were ordered to wait for a vaccine. (Can you name another illness in which doctors were ordered not to treat their gatients until they became critical? Those who promoted early treatment of Covid 19 were ostracized and several had their licenses revoked for it. Meanwhile there are now multiple published examples of the effectiveness of Ivermectin, vitamins C & D, and zinc.)

Click to expand...
 
I just got over COVID, third time having it. It took me a few days to recognize the symptoms, at first I thought it was a head cold, but the crushing fatigue and vomiting sealed it. I think I got it at the hospital ER when I injured my knee.

Third time having it. Missed a day of work, but I was also dealing with the knee. Ivermectin, stopped my anti-rejection meds, and increased my Prednisone and I was fine after a few days. I'm supposed to be super at risk. Yeah bull. I don't need no jab.
 
knarfeng said:
Meanwhile, back on point, Here's an interesting presentation by Dr Peter Mccullough. He spends much his presentation discussing documented findings of vaccine injuries. He also touches on the history of the pandemic response, including the attempt to shut down all efforts to treat the sickness. Instead, doctors were instructed to wait for a vaccine, rather than try to treat ill patients. (Can you name another illness in which doctors were ordered not to treat their gatients until they became critical? Those who promoted early treatment of Covid 19 were ostracized and several had their licenses revoked for it. Meanwhile there are now multiple published examples of the effectiveness of Ivermectin, vitamins C & D, and zinc.)

Click to expand...

Two sides to the story

 
Chefget said:
Two sides to the story

Click to expand...
With insufficient substantiation of why he was judged to be inaccurate, excuse me if I qustion your source.
"Abundant data show that vaccination during pregnancy is safe for the mother and the unborn child and effectively reduces the risks of complications from the disease." They say there is data, but don't cite it.
 
No one knows what’s in the Vax. There was zero time to test and prove that the Vax doesn’t affect pregnancies. The things people do out of fear. 🤦‍♂️

I’ve got a bottle of apple juice for anyone that is thirsty…
 
knarfeng said:
With insufficient substantiation of why he was judged to be inaccurate, excuse me if I qustion your source.
"Abundant data show that vaccination during pregnancy is safe for the mother and the unborn child and effectively reduces the risks of complications from the disease." They say there is data, but don't cite it.
Click to expand...

If you click the title studies and sources are cited.

To me, science usually makes more sense than conspiracy.
 
Chefget said:
If you click the title studies and sources are cited.

To me, science usually makes more sense than conspiracy.
Click to expand...
There's a list of documents at the end of the review. Which ones are which.

I could not find the reviewer's name or credentials. What are the credentials of the reviewer?
For this review
The argument for rejecting McCoulough's comments are
In his post, McCullough highlighted a part of Table 1 from Jorgensen et al., which summarizes the characteristics of the study population, such as the mothers’ age, the infants’ weight at birth, and the preexisting health conditions of the mothers.

In particular, Table 1 indicates that the same proportion of women got COVID-19 during pregnancy, whether they belonged to the vaccinated or unvaccinated category. At first glance, such statistics would appear to support McCullough’s claim that the study revealed no benefits from vaccination.

However, this is a misinterpretation of what the study can and cannot reveal. Indeed, clinical or epidemiological studies are designed in order to answer specific scientific questions formulated in advance. They cannot always be used to analyze other questions than the one initially formulated. Doing otherwise requires caution and the understanding that it may introduce bias.
Click to expand...

That last paragraph is poppycock. Or it was until covid came around. For decades reviewers have been able to extract conclusions from data which was collected for another purpose. Only with covid is it suddenly required that only the topic of the study is valid. So what are the reviewer's credentials that he goes against decades of scientific practice?
 
Chefget said:
If you click the title studies and sources are cited.

To me, science usually makes more sense than conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I used to think so too. I am, afterall, a chemist and engineer. Then I discovered that The Lancet, the leading medical journal in the western hemisphere, allowed to be published an article claiming that the writers had data showing that hydroxychloroquin caused patient deaths. FDA jumped on that and forbade any further work with hydroxychloroquin. Even though it had a long history of effective use. However, when challenged to show the data the authors claimed to have, they had none. The entire article was spurious. How does a completely bogus article appear in one of the world's leading journals? The fact that the data did not exist should have been visible to the slightest competant peer review. How the hell does such a screw up occur? That's when I learned to stop "Following The Science" and start "Following the Money".
 
knarfeng said:
Yeah, I used to think so too. I am, afterall, a chemist and engineer. Then I discovered that The Lancet, the leading medical journal in the western hemisphere, allowed to be published an article claiming that the writers had data showing that hydroxychloroquin caused patient deaths. FDA jumped on that and forbade any further work with hydroxychloroquin. Even though it had a long history of effective use. However, when challenged to show the data the authors claimed to have, they had none. The entire article was spurious. How does a completely bogus article appear in one of the world's leading journals? The fact that the data did not exist should have been visible to the slightest competant peer review. How the hell does such a screw up occur? That's when I learned to stop "Following The Science" and start "Following the Money".
Click to expand...
And that is the most “positive” interpretation of events. I can think of more sinister versions casting a wider net on the recent events.
 

Lot variation: How bad is my batch?​

Previously, I never bothered with the “how bad is my batch” analysis because the denominator is kept secret making any conclusions subject to attack.

The reason the denominator is kept secret is to protect the public from learning the truth about how deadly the product is.

If you have a safe vaccine, the number of deaths per lot should be relatively steady.

Drug makers know some batches are 30X or more deadly than other batches, but by not disclosing the number of vials injected into arms, they can keep the public in the dark as to whether there is a safety signal or not. So that’s what they do.

After being prompted by some data I was given recently showing a more than 30X disparity between batches, I spent time on the How Bad is My Batch website and confirmed that yes, this is not an artifact, this is the real deal.

It took all of 2 minutes. That site alone is proof of enormous excess mortality. You really don’t need anything else.

BREAKING: Israeli MoH data proves the vaccines are killing people. How come nobody noticed??

BREAKING: Israeli MoH data proves the vaccines are killing people. How c...​

Steve Kirsch
In March 2023, MIT Professor Retsef Levi disclosed a troubling figure produced by the Israeli Ministry of Health...
 
Has there been a ‘good’ batch???
How’s following the $cience & experts sound now???

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top