How bad is my batch ?

knarfeng said:
had measles, mumps, and chicken pox all in one year, 1959. I don't worry about them.
And exactly what does your post have to do with Covid? You know, the topic of this thread?


Edited to add: out of 31,290,831 people in Texas, less than 100 have the measles. 0.0003%
Click to expand...

The relevance to this thread is that the demonization of vaccines, especially when politically motivated, can influence people that don't know any better causing unintended and unnecessary (verging on immoral) harm as we're witnessing in real time in Texas.

But you are correct; my contribution to this thread is useful only to point out that even though *all* the lifesaving vaccines that have been developed have had problems, the demonization and blame toward science is at an all time dangerous level. Vaccines are something that take the cooperation of a 'community' to be effective and can be rendered ineffectual by enough 'patriots' in the given population. And the 'bad batch' thing is now, as in the past, a lever of argument for not getting the vaccine.

And you are correct, I have no more good contributions to this thread. We all have our concepts of personal freedoms and how it effects others.

You do you and we'll call it a day :thumbsup:

1000019334.jpg
 
knarfeng said:
had measles, mumps, and chicken pox all in one year, 1959. I don't worry about them.
And exactly what does your post have to do with Covid? You know, the topic of this thread?


Edited to add: out of 31,290,831 people in Texas, less than 100 have the measles. 0.0003%
Click to expand...
False equivalency between diseases and vaccine types—and gene therapy that doesn’t work and does cause harm. Strawman by other poster.

Also, wonder how those measles cases entered the US and wound up just over the border in TX. Just wondering…
 
Could it be……..aliens??????
🤣🤣🤣
annr said:
False equivalency between diseases and vaccine types—and gene therapy that doesn’t work and does cause harm. Strawman by other poster.

Also, wonder how those measles cases entered the US and wound up just over the border in TX. Just wondering…
Click to expand...
 
Title of the thread is "How Bad is my Batch". According to the Slovakian government commission investigating the vaccine, it may be quite bad.

Apparently the government of Slovakia launched a formal investigation into the Covid vaccines. They checked the vaccines which had been administered to their people. They found that they contained a mixture of both RNA and DNA. The DNA was considered significant because it can make permanent changes to human DNA. They found that both the RNA and the DNA caused the formation of a specific protein which is known to cause heart issues.
The leader of the Slovakian government commission was an MD, Dr. Peter Kotlar. He is a member of the Slovakian Parliament.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1900312640074977718

Highlights from his public announcement:
Dr. Peter Kotlár, Slovak Physician, Government Commissioner, MP:

"My primary task is to uphold the Constitution, and as a doctor, I have the duty and the right to protect the health of Slovak citizens. Yesterday, I also informed the U.S. Minister of Health and Human Services by letter, Mr. Robert Kennedy Jr., who confirmed receipt. Furthermore, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Kash Patel and Pamela Bondi, the U.S. Attorney General, were also informed.

"34 batches from Pfizer and Moderna have been analyzed so far, which were stored according to the proper cold chain and only those that were used for the Slovak population during the COVID-19 epidemic. Today, I will present the most significant result of the analysis. "

"The results of the analysis of all, I repeat, all analyzed batches proved that in every single vial, there is an extremely high amount of DNA, a vector that encodes the cassette for the synthesis of the S-protein, if not other proteins as well. Almost in the same amount as mRNA, DNA is also present there. In three cases, the DNA content is even higher than the mRNA. This can no longer even be considered an mRNA vaccine. This genetic code for the synthesis of the S-protein, this information stored in this DNA, is stable compared to mRNA, can integrate into human nuclear DNA, and subsequently, such a human organism becomes -- I'm not afraid to say officially -- a genetically modified organism."

"Such a high DNA content on this scale is absolutely scandalous and should immediately lead to a ban..."
Click to expand...
 
Chefget said:
www.euractiv.com

Slovak president, experts and opposition slam official for vaccine hoaxes - Euractiv

The MP leading a government review of resource management has even questioned whether Slovakia ever had a pandemic.
www.euractiv.com www.euractiv.com
Click to expand...


Thank you!

From the article, bold mine.


“He has no evidence and refuses to publish his analyses,” Dvořák said, urging the Health Minister to condemn the remarks as a “grave insult to scientists, healthcare workers, and pandemic victims.”

The bold seems too early to state. He has yet to release it so they could not possibly know if he has no evidence. He said he will release it by the deadline at the end of the month, which is not (yet) a refusal.


“Instead of assessing what (pandemic measures) worked and what didn’t, we are debating whether mRNA vaccines contained chips or whether people will be controlled by aliens. That’s a huge mistake,” the president said."


Reviewing the vaccines is literally a facet of assessing what worked and what did not. 🤦‍♂️

If he thinks the report will claim aliens then he should be eager for the release so it can be debunked. Unless that was a strawman.



Release the data. If it's crap, it will be debunked. If it is true, the people need to know.


Let's see if he does on March 31, 2025. Even if he's a little late, ill forgive it as that's still much better then the half century our very own FDA tried to wait.
 
Chefget said:
First thing that comes up in aGoogle search...

View attachment 2823571
Click to expand...
Yes, I found that. I note that this item ignored the fact that Dr. Kotlar is an MD and actually has the data. The link I gave was a preliminary report of the findings of a government inquiry. The president who criticized the findings is NOT an MD, and is making accusations based on zero data.
 
Since they are the ones making the claims of safety and efficacy, the onus is on them to support their claims. Oops. They can’t. Game over.
 
link.springer.com

Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination - Clinical Research in Cardiology

Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is lacking. We describe the autopsy findings and...
link.springer.com link.springer.com

Cases of myocarditis, diagnosed clinically by laboratory tests and imaging have been described in the context of mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Autopsy-based description of detailed histological features of vaccine-induced myocarditis is lacking. We describe the autopsy findings and common characteristics of myocarditis in untreated persons who received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Standardized autopsies were performed on 25 persons who had died unexpectedly and within 20 days after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In four patients who received a mRNA vaccination, we identified acute (epi-)myocarditis without detection of another significant disease or health constellation that may have caused an unexpected death. Histology showed patchy interstitial myocardial T-lymphocytic infiltration, predominantly of the CD4 positive subset, associated with mild myocyte damage. Overall, autopsy findings indicated death due to acute arrhythmogenic cardiac failure. Thus, myocarditis can be a potentially lethal complication following mRNA-based anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Our findings may aid in adequately diagnosing unclear cases after vaccination and in establishing a timely diagnosis in vivo, thus, providing the framework for adequate monitoring and early treatment of severe clinical cases.

​

 
Last edited:
A few tidbits of info straight from the Dutch hospital:

The use of morphine has gone through the roof here, i was told in large part due to it's use to diminish the pain for patients with end stage cancers and other forms of terminal illnessess.
This of course goes hand-in-hand with the also very large rise in the use of cytostatics (general term for cancer medications)

On the one hand there are now waiting lists for hospices in this country, while on the other hand mortally ill people need not wait very long for a spot as the people already in there often die within days, not weeks or months like before.

The term "turbo cancer" isn't used by doctors and hospital staff, but apparently they still needed a name to describe what they increasingly see happening, so it's now officially named "fast-progressing cancer" .
This is now also written on patient records, something that until recently never happened according to my source.
 
Last edited:

Long-Term Thyroid Outcomes After COVID-19 Vaccination: A Cohort Study of 2 333 496 Patients From the TriNetX Network​

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, dgaf064, https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf064


Published:

30 January 2025

Abstract​

Context
Reports on long-term thyroid dysfunction following COVID-19 vaccination are limited. Understanding the risk of subacute thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism in vaccinated individuals is crucial for postvaccination monitoring.
Objective
This study evaluated the risk of thyroid dysfunction in individuals vaccinated against COVID-19 compared to unvaccinated individuals, using a large cohort.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2023, using the TriNetX database, including 1 166 748 vaccinated and 1 166 748 unvaccinated individuals. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes were new diagnoses of subacute thyroiditis, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism.
Results
The risk of subacute thyroiditis remained unchanged (95% CIs included 1). A significant reduction in hyperthyroidism risk was observed from 3 to 9 months postvaccination (hazard ratios [HRs]: 0.65-0.89, all 95% CIs below 1), but this trend was not significant at 12 months (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.92-1.06). In contrast, the risk of hypothyroidism significantly increased from 6 to 12 months postvaccination (HR: 1.14-1.30, all 95% CIs above 1). Among mRNA vaccine recipients, the risk of both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism was significantly elevated at 12 months (HR: 1.16-2.13).
Conclusion
COVID-19 vaccination was associated with a reduced risk of hyperthyroidism and an increased risk of hypothyroidism, highlighting the need for ongoing thyroid function monitoring.

COVID-19 vaccination, thyroid dysfunction, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, subacute thyroiditis, retrospective cohort study
Issue Section:
Clinical Research Article



Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society 2025.
 
Dr. Dhand works in the State of MA as a hospitalist. Here he discusses a local story of concern:


From one commenter: Dr. Judy Mikovits predicted this when the shots first came out. She said there would be "an explosion of turbo cancers" within about 3 to 5 years.

Of course, Dr. Mikovits has been labeled as connected to fake science....
 
The linkage between that and the Covid vaccine is nebulous at best. Need a lot more data before any causality can be assigned.
 
knarfeng said:
The linkage between that and the Covid vaccine is nebulous at best. Need a lot more data before any causality can be assigned.
Click to expand...
If you watched the video, the doctor made NO such linkage. It was a commenter. Take that as an example of what people are left wondering about, at best, thanks to this black box (unknown, poorly studied) treatment.
 
Umm, I did watch the video. And the Dr. did not make a linkage. But you did by posting it in this thread. Hence my prior response.
 
I was responding to another post above that asked if others had heard of turbo cancers being a concern…I neither endorsed nor refuted the comment.

My point is twofold: yes people are talking about turbo cancers; and if there were properly controlled studies, perhaps this would not be a nagging question (however remote) or area we are not able to explore with some degree of scientific rigor.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top