How Do You Deal With Custom Delivery Problems Without Being An Insensitive Boor?

Feedback: +0 / =0 / -0
Joined
Mar 15, 1999
Messages
567
Okay, folks…I find myself in a situation that I’m not sure how to handle, and I thought I’d see if you might have any suggestions. Moderators, please feel free to move this thread to a more appropriate location if necessary.

A few months ago (July of this year) a well-known maker posted a beautiful knife in the “for sale” areas of the forums. I’ve admired this maker’s knives for a long time, and this particular blade was one of the nicest-looking examples of his work that I had seen. As soon as I saw the posting I sent an e-mail offering to purchase the knife (at his asking price) if it was still available. I was at the office at the time and I asked that any correspondence be directed to my home address; I explained that I wouldn’t be able to review my messages until that afternoon.

That same morning, the maker sent me a message that indicating that the knife was still available and that my inquiry was in fact the first firm offer he had received. This is where it gets complicated :rolleyes:. Later that afternoon he followed up with a message saying that he had subsequently been in contact with another buyer who was interested in the knife and wanted to pick it up the following day. The maker said he would still sell the knife to me (since I had made the first purchase offer), but he asked if I might be willing to let the other prospective client purchase the posted knife because, as he put it: “if this guy cant pick it up then, i dont think he will buy another etc...”. In exchange for this consideration, he offered me a similar knife…“another like it, that i actually like better that i will be finishing next week”.

I’m an accommodating kind of guy, and I like to try and help folks out when I have the chance. I thought about the proposed scenario for a few minutes and then decided that this would be acceptable (I know, I know…I’m a chump :rolleyes: ). I tried calling the maker and couldn’t reach him, so I sent an e-mail indicating that “I'm not in any real hurry, so I suppose that it wouldn't hurt to wait a bit if the other knife in work is of similar quality and dimensions. Besides, I really don't mind delaying my gratification if it will help out a fellow knife enthusiast. If the other knife you're working on will be ready in the next week or two and is priced the same as the one you posted on the forums, I'll be happy to let the other customer take this one.”

The maker was profusely grateful, and promised to be in touch soon. He called me a couple of days later and confirmed that the ‘new’ knife was in work and would be ready shortly. As per our discussion I sent him a money order as payment for the knife, inasmuch as he had indicated that the blade would be shipping shortly; he confirmed receipt of my payment a few days later. One of these days I’ll learn not to pay for custom cutlery in advance…

As you’ve probably surmised, I have not received the knife as of this date. I dislike being a nuisance so I was reluctant to contact the maker at first, but after a few weeks I e-mailed him about the status of the project. He assured me that the knife would be shipping the following week and apologized for the delay. A few more weeks passed…we exchanged e-mails occasionally, and I kept on receiving assurances that the knife was nearly finished. On a couple of occasions, he told me that he was making me a “different and better” blade than the one we had originally discussed (the general specifications of the ‘new’ knives were similar, but I can’t help but wonder what happened to the blade(s) that he was working on for me).

As it stands now, I haven’t heard from this gentleman in several weeks (despite periodic attempts at contact via e-mail and telephone). The situation is complicated by the fact that I’ve learned that this maker is currently dealing with some pretty devastating personal problems that have probably compromised his ability to meet his delivery schedules. This maker is a genuinely nice guy who is very well respected with the knife community…I don’t bear him any ill will, and I certainly don’t want to be an ass by nagging him about something as trivial as a knife delivery when he’s going through a personal crisis. That being said, he has had my money for over three months, and I can’t help but feel that I’m at least entitled to a revised (and meaningful) delivery schedule. I should note that it normally doesn't bother me to wait for custom cutlery; I've waited patiently on some makers for years with the understanding that handcrafted items don't lend themselves to rigid production schedules (although I've seldom had to wait this long for items that were fully paid for in advance).

I’m not trying to be deliberately obfuscatory by not naming the maker…it is not my intent to damage his reputation or exert any kind of undue pressure. I’m simply trying to get an idea of what would be a good way to handle the situation. I’m sure that some of you have surmised whom I’m talking about, but at this point I’d prefer to limit this thread to an abstract discussion of the responsibilities and expected behaviors in this type of situation. Since there is (in my estimation) no reason to suspect the maker of having any ulterior motive, should I be overly concerned by the fact that I haven’t received this knife? I’d like to be reasonable, especially in light of the difficulties this individual is facing right now, but at what point does ‘waiting patiently’ transition from being considerate into being played for a sucker?

I apologize for the overly long rant, but I’m really beginning to be frustrated by this situation and I needed to vent a little. I suppose that I bear some culpability for the current state of affairs, since (1) I (perhaps naively) agreed to let the ‘second’ (or maybe simply more assertive) customer purchase the original knife, and (2) I sent in my payment before I had an iron-clad assurance that my knife was ready to ship (although I was under the impression that shipment actually was imminent at the time). At this point I’m just trying to decide what my next course of action (if any) should be. Any thoughts or suggestions you might have would be most appreciated…

Jim
 
hmm, if it was me, I'd tell him either the knife or the money by the end of the week. If he can't do either, then I'd say I would consider it theft and take appropriate action.
 
Ah Young Skywalker you have learned a very valuable lesson....YOU NEVER, EVER PAY A CUSTOM KNIFE MAKER IN ADVANCE. When he is finally ready to ship the knife, then send him/her payment.

Note, this is from a guy who has several friends who are custom knife makers.

I agree with DaveH. Its the knife or the money in 7 days. If you can have neither, then get with the local postal inspectors.

Just so you know, by law you have 3 days to review anything purchased site unseen. You can always return the knife.

However, as this individual seems to have difficulty with correspondence. I would just cancel the order and ask for the money back.
 
Originally posted by Les Robertson
I agree with DaveH. Its the knife or the money in 7 days. If you can have neither, then get with the local postal inspectors.
Thanks for the responses, guys. I suppose it has come to the point where I need to start thinking in those kinds of terms, but I’m still somewhat reluctant to deliver that sort of ultimatum when the maker is already going through a rough patch. Besides, I’d really like to get the knife :rolleyes:. I was not horribly bothered by the delays at first; the maker was (initially) very good at keeping in touch (and I was gullible enough to believe the repeated promises of imminent delivery). In any event, I’m not sure how I could deliver the ultimatum (or cancel the order) at this point…I haven’t been able to contact this guy by either phone or e-mail for several weeks.

As far as paying makers in advance: yeah, I realize that this is generally not a good idea but at the time I sent in my payment I was under the impression (based on conversations with the maker) that the knife was, for all practical purposes, ready…the maker had indicated that it just needed some final finishing and that it would be ready to ship in a day or two. Based on my prior experiences with custom makers I felt that this was an appropriate time to remit my payment (I was eager to get the knife, after all)…live and learn, I guess (although this is turning out to be a moderately expensive lesson).
 
People always say that you should never send payment to a maker until the knife is ready to ship and I tend to agree. The problem in this case is that the maker said the knife would be ready shortly. When I am informed by a maker that my knife will be ready shortly I will send the money so that the knife can be shipped as soon as it is done. So for this has never come back to bite me in the butt.

I am pretty sure that I know who this maker is. He has had a lot of trouble lately and has fallen way behind in his orders. He has even come on this forum to explain his situation to everyone and to apologize for his tardiness. As has been stated and from all accounts he really is a heck of a nice guy. However, he should not be accepting payment until he is done making a knife. This will get him in all kinds of trouble as time goes along. This kind of thing has ruined the career of more than a few knifemakers.

Hopefully he will see this thread and do something about making this right. There may well be an acceptable excuse for the delay, but there is no acceptable excuse for the lack of communication.

This kind of thing is very disheartening. It is unacceptable for you as the buyer and possibly devastating for the reputation of the maker. He is someone that I want to get a knife from, but I would be hesitant to do so at this time.
 
Originally posted by Keith Montgomery
There may well be an acceptable excuse for the delay, but there is no acceptable excuse for the lack of communication.
Exactly (thanks for stating it so succinctly, Keith). I really don’t want to cause any further trouble for this gentleman…I’d just like to get some assurance that I’ll eventually receive my knife. I sincerely hope that he’s able to successfully weather the problems he’s going through right now, and it is most definitely not my intention to crucify him for something as relatively insignificant as falling behind in his orders in the midst of a personal crisis. That being said, I’m having a difficult time excusing the lack of communication…I’m inclined to be charitable, but I can’t help but be somewhat suspicious when someone renders themselves incommunicado in the middle of a transaction. My bad, I guess…

Originally posted by Keith Montgomery
Hopefully he will see this thread and do something about making this right.
I hope so, too...:(
 
Jim;

Keep us posted, please.

I think I also know who this maker is, and he has had some problems in the past with this kind of thing. This is what ruins reputations. If this is indeed the maker I'm thinking about, I'll never do business with him, even if he offers me a knife for 10 bucks. He has way too many excuses, and not enough ethics.

I agree with Keith; there is no excuse for his lack of communication, especially for a paid in full customer.


Again, please keep us posted.
 
but why not name who it is ? I have seen this same post by you on 2 different forums . I have narrowed it down to 2 knifemakers .

Wouldn't it help out the next guy if we all knew who it was ?

:confused:
 
I think it is fairly obvious who the maker is. So many times when a maker does this, you can search back and find that has happened before, only the excuses change. Its one disaster or another time after time.

I know you dont want to be played as a sucker, but it seems that is what he has done already.

I think makers of that type have gotten used to the idea that since they are "makers" then most people for some strange reason are reluctant to name names. I have seen "regular forumites" named just because they were to slow to respond to email, and makers whose names are protected for months after sticking it to somebody. That just aint right.

Im with Code3 here, I would not order a knife from that guy. In fact if for some reason I did, it would be on the condition that the knife was delivered to me first, then the MO would be sent.

I also agree with the45 guy, why not name him? It always seems to me that it would be bad if somebody were to order from the maker, get screwed and then later find out that he had done it before but people were to afraid to speak up. Hey, maybe by naming him you will actually spare somebody else the same hassle.

On the other hand, this is your specific deal, your money and your knife. So naming the maker or not is ultimately up to you. Either way I hope you get your knife or your money back in a reasonable time.
 
Originally posted by the45guy
but why not name who it is ? I have seen this same post by you on 2 different forums . I have narrowed it down to 2 knifemakers .

Wouldn't it help out the next guy if we all knew who it was ?

:confused:
I understand your position, and generally I tend to agree with it. However, I’ve seen too many examples recently of angry people making accusations of misconduct, fraud, etc. that later had to be retracted once all of the pertinent information came to light. Prior to “naming names”, I wanted to make certain that I had a legitimate grievance. Sometimes I take things a little too personally, so I wanted to put all of the facts on the table and see if anyone thought I was overreacting or being too impatient (so far, there appears to be a consensus that I do have reason for concern).

I also wanted to give the maker another chance to “make things right” before escalating to the point of publicly identifying him. He hasn’t posted here in a while and I realize that there’s little chance that he’s reading this, but I felt obliged to exhaust all reasonable attempts at communication. I suppose that I (naively) hoped that he might be interested enough in preserving (or salvaging) his reputation to make some effort to contact me, once it became apparent that I was willing to broach this issue on the forums. I did make this posting on a couple of sites, but I was only trying to maximize the chance that the gentleman in question would see and respond to my concerns.

As to the concern that my reluctance to identify the maker may allow other potential customers to enter into a transaction with an unreliable maker: This is definitely a legitimate point, and I thought about it a great deal before structuring my post the way I did. I think that there is probably sufficient information in my initial posting for most folks to determine whom I’m referring to, but if anyone has a vested interest in knowing the maker’s identity I can provide the information via private e-mail. This maker isn’t maintaining an active presence on the Internet at this point and I don’t think he is currently soliciting or accepting any more orders, so I doubt if there’s much risk of anyone else becoming embroiled in a similarly problematic deal. Besides, it seemed to me that there were enough unusual circumstances in this particular transaction (i.e., missteps by both myself and the maker as well as uncontrollable events) to make it unlikely that the situation would repeat itself. Still, I understand that past behavior is a legitimate consideration in dealing with a custom knife maker, so I’ll plan on naming this gentleman here if I don’t hear from him soon.

Originally posted by Richard
I think makers of that type have gotten used to the idea that since they are "makers" then most people for some strange reason are reluctant to name names. I have seen "regular forumites" named just because they were to slow to respond to email, and makers whose names are protected for months after sticking it to somebody. That just aint right.
My reluctance to “name names” at this point has nothing to do any type of unwarranted adulation for knife makers; I certainly expect them to adhere to the same standards for ethical conduct as anyone else. That being said, I do think that there is a difference between reporting a private “deal gone bad” between two members and publicly questioning the integrity of a knifemaker. Both types of reporting are necessary to the health of the community, but the latter action has the potential for much greater consequences. Individual traders/sellers who conduct themselves in a less than ethical manner run the risk of losing the ability to participate in a hobby, whereas makers who fail to honor the terms of their agreements stand to (justifiably) incur significant damage to their livelihood. Unethical behavior in either case is unacceptable, but since the consequences of publicly castigating a maker are so much greater, I personally feel that the threshold for making any allegations against a maker is somewhat higher. In this particular case, it seems to me that there is still a (slight) chance the my problems with the maker are due to miscommunications or circumstances beyond either party’s control…I am not comfortable with trashing someone’s reputation unless I am absolutely certain that they have betrayed my trust. I guess I’m just a sucker…:rolleyes:

I appreciate the advice and support I’ve gotten here, guys…it’s certainly given me some insight into how I should handle future transactions. If I don’t hear from the maker in question soon I’ll post his name here in the interest of warning the community about a potential problem, but I want to give it a few more days to see if it might still work out.

Edited to correct a grammatical error
 
Jim :

Undertand where you are coming from 100 % . I have had a few people email me and tell me that you are a complete standup guy.

Sorry if my post offended or rustled you in any way.

Good luck and hopefully things will ne made right by the maker.
 
Originally posted by the45guy
Sorry if my post offended or rustled you in any way.
Not a problem at all, John...I certainly wasn't offended. Your point was well taken, and I probably needed to clarify my position.
 
the45guy:
I have had a few people email me and tell me that you are a complete standup guy.

Yeah, Jim is a good guy. Dont know if he remembers or not, its been a couple of years at least, but I made a trade with him once...smooth as glass.

And Jim, no you're not a sucker. I see where you are coming from. I understand you do not want to do any unwarranted damage to this maker, and you are willing to take all steps to only name him as a last resort. You are more patient than most :)

Anyways, my advice and others in this thread are from an outside point of view. You are the one directly involved. Regardless of anybody elses opinions, you are handling this well. Good luck, and hopefully your thread is the kick in the pants this guy needs to get back on track. Hope it works out for you.
 
Originally posted by Richard
Yeah, Jim is a good guy. Dont know if he remembers or not, its been a couple of years at least, but I made a trade with him once...smooth as glass.
Of course I remember, Richard…if I recall correctly, we made a deal for a pre-production BM 730 Ares (my first Axis Lock, and still goin’ strong :)).

Originally posted by Richard
And Jim, no you're not a sucker.
Well, the jury is still out on that one…;)

Believe me, I’m not in the least offended by any of the comments or critiques that have been offered thus far. I just felt that things had reached the point where I had to vent a little in order to preserve my sanity. As Les suggested, a valuable lesson has been learned…

I appreciate the support, gentlemen.
 
Jim, as you have stated, this maker has gone through hell in the last while. I sure hope he contacts you soon as he really is a good guy that has had a huge amount of crap pile up on him over the last couple of years. I'm not trying to make any excuses for his not communicating with you, but I really do think that he will make good given time.
 
Jim, if this maker would have emailed or phoned you and said, "I've got a real problem here, can you hold off for a while?" Would you have ever started this thread?
 
I think Jim should change his screen name to " Jim the Saint " , I think his patience is about 10 times what mine would have been.

A simple " Hey Jim I am in deep crap here , can I get some more time ? "

I am sure Jim would have , judging by his post of That being said, he has had my money for over three months, and I can’t help but feel that I’m at least entitled to a revised (and meaningful) delivery schedule. . I think some contact would have been to Jim's liking ..... to be 100 % blown off is just not right.
 
Originally posted by PhilL
Jim, if this maker would have emailed or phoned you and said, "I've got a real problem here, can you hold off for a while?" Would you have ever started this thread?
No, as a matter of fact I wouldn’t have started this thread if the maker had kept in touch with me and let me know that the projected delivery schedule was slipping (again) due to personal problems. I understand that there are a lot of things more important than knives, and I’m certainly willing to cut someone a little slack in the midst of a crisis. I had a vague idea of what this gentleman was going through and I was willing to wait patiently until he got back on his feet. About a month ago he reassured me that he was going to continue working on the knife and that it be would ready shortly. He said he would call me within a week with a status update, and asked me to give him a call if I hadn’t heard from him by that time. After a couple of weeks went by and I hadn’t heard anything, I started trying to contact him again…it was only after several weeks of not getting any response that I began worry and decided to post this thread.

It was never my intent to crucify this maker by starting this topic…I just wanted to see if some of the other members thought that I had legitimate reason for concern, and what actions they recommended (if any). Kind of a sanity check, if you will. My cause may have been better served if I had posted in one of the discussion forums rather than the GB&U. As Keith mentioned in one of his earlier replies, the problem wasn’t the delays in delivery, it was the lack of communication. Also, I suppose it’s possible that I did overreact…if so, mea culpa.

For what it’s worth, I finally spoke with this maker this evening and I think the issue is going to be resolved satisfactorily. I still think he could have handled the comms in this deal a little better, but given the circumstances he’s going through such lapses are understandable (to me at least). I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt at this point and hope that it all works out for the best.
 
Originally posted by the45guy
I think Jim should change his screen name to " Jim the Saint "
Hmmmmmm..."Jimmy the Saint". Wasn't that the name of Andy Garcia's character in "Things To Do In Denver When You're Dead"? ;) It certainly doesn't apply in my case, but I appreciate the sentiment.
 
Back
Top