From what I understand AEBL at RC60 for a kitchen knife is leaving performance on the table. RC61-62 is the preferred hardness. This is what I started with and still use for AEBL. If I remember correctly this is also the hardness DT uses for his AEBL kitchen knives. So why use AEBL @ RC60 for this comparison? I apologize if I missed the explanation somewhere
When we did the testing, our third coupon was a mule of pattern welded 154cm and AEB-L, equal layers, 100 total layers. We were trying to see if there was a Damascus cutting effect. I think there was a small increase in card stock cut greater than the average of the two materials.
The reason for taking coupons to 60 hrc is that it would be easy to hit that number for the Damascus coupon givin slightly differing heat treats for the two combined materials. Also, 60 hrc is pretty standard.
The Catra test is not a good test for most steels. The card stock is impregnated with quartz, I know of no one who uses a regular knife to cut rocks. Steels/knives that do well have large amounts of very hard carbides. In the real world, knives are on a more equal footing.
Hoss