Hang on, hang on, I did say I love the peanut. It just took me till a certain stage in my life to do it. I still think a soddie junior is a great knife, but for me right now, the peanut is better. It's a great suburbia pocket knife for 99% of what we need.
As far as a good .22 rifle, it's hard to go wrong with most of them. How much do ya want to spend? Bolt action or semi-auto? Synthetic stock or wood?
If you can find a clean used old model Marlin 39 in any of its variations, they are a fantasitic gun. Old fashioned, but extremly accurite, and with three moving parts in a take down receiver, its reliable as a rock and easy to clean. Both of ours have the Williams Fool Proof peep sights, and are target rifle accurite.
Of the new guns, the bolt action Savage is a good shooter, as is the bolt action Marlin rifles. The CZ is also a great shooter, and priced very competitivly.
There is no comparison of the old pre-war Colt woodsman to the standard model Ruger. The Colt was in a class by itself in fit and finish, while the Ruger in a side by side comparison is a bit crude. The Ruger is more reliable with a wider range of ammo though. The old Colt was a little finicky with ammo it didn't like. From the 1950's on, the Ruger was the better shooting gun for somebody who didn't care about looks, just preformance. My old standard model back from when they were 39.95 shoots anything I stuff in the magazine. If you can find a used Ruger MK2, you'll have a very nice gun without the d--m magazine saftey they put on the MK3.
Okay, now you give us a good report on peanut use you encountered while you were gone.
We want to know.
Well, I got to shoot a couple of Rugers. One was a standard MkII, the other 2 were bearcats (revolvers). Boy there nifty little guns. I wonder if being a revolver their more or less of a pain to strip?