- Joined
- Jul 22, 2000
- Messages
- 981
This is a question best answered by our resident steel experts. How important is the heat treat OVER the steel type. Is there a balancing act required? Do we consumer level knife knuts ignore this factor too often by going strictly with steel type?
There there seems to be a generalization that AUS-8 is better than 440A, and ATS-34 is better than AUS-8,...
I would think that how the steel is heat treated would be a critical factor. That a properly heat-treated AUS-8 would be preferable to a brittle, poorly heat treated ATS-34.
Are the steel suppliers, and heat treat methods of most commercially made knives pretty similar? I.E. is Benchmade's 154CM, similar to Microtech's 154CM?
There just seems to be a generalization that a knife is good because it's blade is made of ATS-34, CPM 440V, D2, or whatever. Many manufacturers use this as a selling point. Obviously there are other factors.
[This message has been edited by Full Tang Clan (edited 02-03-2001).]
There there seems to be a generalization that AUS-8 is better than 440A, and ATS-34 is better than AUS-8,...
I would think that how the steel is heat treated would be a critical factor. That a properly heat-treated AUS-8 would be preferable to a brittle, poorly heat treated ATS-34.
Are the steel suppliers, and heat treat methods of most commercially made knives pretty similar? I.E. is Benchmade's 154CM, similar to Microtech's 154CM?
There just seems to be a generalization that a knife is good because it's blade is made of ATS-34, CPM 440V, D2, or whatever. Many manufacturers use this as a selling point. Obviously there are other factors.
[This message has been edited by Full Tang Clan (edited 02-03-2001).]