Troop,
I understand what you are saying, but the OP question was for side by side testing of different steels. To eliminate as many variables as possible, the cooling rate should be the same for all samples.
In doing the HT on a knife blade, the cooling rate must be fast enough to miss the pearlite nose at 1000F, and then gentle enough to drop smoothly to the Martensitic start point. This can be done fairly rapidly for most oil and water hardening blade steels and thickness. If you delay it too long, some of the supersaturated austenite ( That is what you have between the pearlite nose and the Ms), can stabilize, or go into a structure called bainite, which has some of the features of pearlite and austenite. Bainite is not as hard as martensite, but it is much tougher.
From the Ms to the Mf, the range when the steel converts to hard martensite, the cooling needs to be a bit slower and as even as possible. The rate of cooling in this range varies somewhat depending on the steel type, but for most common blade steels, this is best left to the cooling rate of the oil. That is one good reason to use professionally engineered quenchants, as these features are built into them.
Letting the steel cool as slowly as possible ( air cool) sounds like it would be a good way to avoid any stress, but too slow can have its hazards in some steels. The warm oil will allow a gradual drop from 400F to 130F at a suitable rate for almost any knife blade. Some steels have hours between Ms and Mf, but that would not benefit the blade over an ambient air quench or quench plates.
In reading the TTT charts the times shown are the maximum for each transition.....not the optimum.