OK, I'll bite. What "not needed" gear are you talking about? It seems to me that ounces become pounds, and pounds become work. I try not to take anything that isn't "needed."
I wasn't talking about you specifically, or anyone here specifically. It also sounds like you you have your gear knocked down to the important stuff.
What I have meant is, and I have actually seen this stuff out on the trail:
- Lexan coffee press.
- MP3 players.
- Two way radios.
- Solar Chargers for this kind of crap.
- I know I am going to get dinged on this one by a lot of you, but I don't like water filters (maybe it will be apparent why later).
- Excessive lighting toys.
I know there is more, but I think you understand what I mean.
I just got back from a week in the Sierra Madres and didn't need an axe or saw for the entire trip.
Ah hah! You just hit on my love/hate relationship with backpacking. I love backpacking because of the sights. I don't like backpacking because the sights are usually very high traffic areas, that are visited so much that they require people to follow LNT principles, or they would be ruined.
When to goal is to cover ground, follow the trail, make meals as convenient as possible, then an axe is not needed. I have spent plenty of time like that in the outdoors, and I do not enjoy it anymore. IMO, a whole lot of nature is passed by, and you don't get a chance to do a lot of fun stuff

See stuff, yes. Do stuff, no.
I would rather backpack in to a less visited location, and have a "base" camp for a day or two before moving on. Better yet, I love doing the same thing in a canoe. It gives me more time to study plants, relax and enjoy views and work on projects and skills.
The fact that you did not need an axe the entire trip means that we have different goals regarding what we get done on our trips. Which is more than fine. I never said in my original post that "this is what I do, and therefore you must too

" The only reason I offer my opinion on such things, is that it is often different than most, and I hope that more people will enjoy the outdoors in a way that is not wrote about in magazines.
If you are following a "tread lightly" or "leave no trace" philosophy, I'm not sure an axe is appropriate, let alone needed.
I think that LNT is a great idea, in theory. Sometimes it is correct, and sometimes it is not. The whole scheme of things always needs to be looked at. Here is an example:
LNT says no twig burners. I want to boil a cup of water to cook my homemade dehydrated dinner. A homemade stick burner can be made out of stuff was going to get thrown out anyway. The impact to the immediate environment is the loss of a few twigs.
LNT says you have to have a stove. Bought at REI, made in China, shipped across the globe, and oh yeah....you have to burn fossil fuel, extracted by machinery, shipped, packaged and sold.....The impact to the global environment is huge.
Which one has a greater impact on the environment? One has more perceived impact, but the whole picture is not visualized.
I realize the flip side is that you are preserving a pristine environment while keeping the crappy places (where the stoves are manufactured) crappy. But perhaps if people thought more of the "big picture" along time ago, maybe would have more pristine places.
Sorry, didn't mean to offend, and I didn't mean to ramble

Just wanted to clarify my often strange opinion
B