Kailash Blades
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2015
- Messages
- 1,048
Good eye for those background knives. They'll be shared shortly- they're sent off for engraving currentlyDepends on what I'm doing...... Can we see the blades on the far right in that pic please
Hell all of them..![]()

For me personally I've never slipped onto the edge of a blade and it's not for lack of trying. I think the handle contouring has been doing the heavy lifting and generally the least guard possible will give the best knife- lighter, better balance, lower profile. I think there's something reassuring about it visually though and understand the appeal.I care a lot. I'm pro-guard. I'm averse to any knife design that facilitates my hand slipping forward and slicing along the blade during use. Not every knife must have a full guard - most of the time, handle contours are sufficient to be confident of grip.
I think that for a blade of this size it can definitely limit utility. For the mutiny in the background it wouldn't be such a bother but would still impact balance and feel in hand a fair bitIMO, that particular blade is too small/short for a guard like that...looks silly and might get in the way. But I could see it on larger versions, like the left one on the table.
I think the very large guards are mostly a styling thing- they can give a knife a "ready for anything" kind of look without impacting function too much. At the same time I think that the market for a lot of knives isn't based on a clear functional need and is more about wanting something cool so I can see why it has such a large sector.Guard-less knives have a place and purpose, but generally, a small guard or finger choil is enough to ensure a good, safe grip. I actually like some Scandinavian designs as they are good for EDC cutting tasks, but anything that will require any forward directed force will benefit from some form of a guard.
Never understood the use of oversized guards on modern knives, but to each there own.
A lot of our customers would definitely agree! It's a strange one though as khukuris have been generally guardless for such a long time without issues- what do you think has led to this change in desires from users?I want a guard. Non-negotiable.
Is this directeed at me? In which case no, the scourge anniversary has a bottle opener integrated there hahaIs that a finger choil integrated into the guard of the knife you currently have for sale?
I like the speed bump approach. Some people have suggested that's what the cho on a khukuri is- a lightweight and minimal way of letting the hand know when it's gone too far forward.I prefer *some* sort of guard even if it is just a speed bump to let me know I'm close to the edge. SD knives always need a more robust guard.
Fingers crossed it never happens to me! I've been looking at some earlier khukuris recently where it seems clear that the bolster is so wide that a hand at the time wouldn't be able to slide past it despite no actual guard protrusion.I second this. It only took one instance where my hand slid forward onto a sharpened edge to dispel any illusions.
I'm not generally concerned about a guard when it comes to Khukuris as long as the angle of the handle and the ring in the middle of the grip are executed well, both of which provide security against slipping forward in normal use.
I think this comes from the larger trend of bushcraft! and also a move towards historical traditional blade styles or their influences.There seems to be a huge trend of guardless knives in the last few years.I like a traditional guard,like on a Cold Steel Trailmaster; my Busse Hellrazor is the only one without one.
I'm in the same boat- I feel like I use the tip a fair bit but haven't ever really felt the need for a guard.All of this is more or less exactly what I was about to say. I enjoy knife designs without a guard, because I think it's an extremely clean look and it's what I prefer. Also, I tend not to have any needs for a knife where I'm stabbing into something, so I'd need at least a deep Spyderco-esque finger choil for a knife that might see that sort of use. Most guards on knives I own or have owned, a significant guard tends to get in the way.
I think aesthetic is a big part of it! They can make a knife look tougher for sureI like the look and practicality of guards.
Very diplomatic- absolutely rightDepends entirely upon the pattern...and intended use.
I didn't care for the guard/finger choil on the Mule Team.
Looks better deleted.
View attachment 2903432
That's a great little mod! I like a tiny little guard stub sometimes though- I feel it can make the blade profile look a bit "pointier" as the body of the blade is no longer the widest point.
I wonder how much of the inclusion from guards is due to demand by modern western audiences? I've seen some old Leuku with just the slightest hint of a guard but it could also be the handle wearing behind the bolster from lots and lots of use.Some Scandinavian makers make knives without guards, but commonly offer a variant with a guard too.
Mora 511 and 510, Marttiini 240 and 245, all lovely.
The feeling of security is definitely a draw. Do you have much experience with guardless designs?I like a guard, either part of the scales or separate, I don’t trust myself without one. Not like the kukri pictured though.
On this blade the protruding part above the spine is the killer for me- I really like being able to access that part of the spine. I feel like it could snag on some deep cuts too.Obviously, it depends on the use, but generally.. I don't find much need for guards (especially exaggerated ones), or concern for safety without them, in my normal knife tasks. If they exist in a design I like, then.. cool I guess? I don't love full guards and am definitely not a fan of anything that interferes with comfortable thumb placement in my usual saber/Filipino grip, like the one pictured in the op probably would for me..