Again, this is provocative, but not very helpful. He's a guy on YT sharing recipes for the most part. I don't think "real chefs" would be very offended by that. I just wanted to know what the misinformation is. If "real sharpeners" are laughing, what are they laughing at? I'm not defending him; I actually want to know. But it also wasn't my intention to hold anyone up for mean-spirited ridicule.
It's not provocative. It's good advice. He does seem to know
a little bit about cooking and sharpening but actually not a whole lot. He seems to be taking what little he knows and stretching the limits to try to sound like a professional... which he is not (neither in cooking nor in sharpening).
But okay, I'll play. You asked what the misinformation is. Well, based on the videos I forced myself to watch, I can already point out quite a bit:
1. Here’s the
vid in question. He calls pushing the edge away on a stone a “reverse Japanese stroke” and says it is “the most difficult” stroke for sharpening a knife. I think he’s the only person on planet Earth who calls that a “reverse Japanese stroke.” And he claims he uses this revolutionary technique because it allows him to see the angle he is using… I almost lost it right there.
2. He dulls his knife to prep for sharpening by banging the edge against the spine of another knife.
3. He says at the beginning of the video that he will demonstrate a full sharpening through the grit progression all the way to an 8K finish. In the first vid, there is about 15 seconds of actual sharpening. The rest of it is him blathering on about his theories. In both videos (part one and two), he never actually demonstrates a single grit progression.
4. In the
second video, there is a little more actual sharpening (maybe 60 seconds total), but where he does proudly show you his bevel, it is uneven. I think that is because he does this weird flourish thing at the tip… which I wouldn’t advise.
5. His way of testing for sharpness… my God. No comment. Take a look at 11:37 of the second video. That is
extremely dangerous to the point of stupid and tells you nothing about your edge. When he does eventually test on paper, he’s using stock copy paper and holding the edge at nearly parallel to the paper… not exactly a great test of keenness.
Is his final edge “sharp?” Yes, I guess... sort of. Hard to tell given the way he tests edges. But I’ve already made the point in my previous post. He does seem to know “something” about cooking and sharpening. I'm not saying he's completely pretending to know how to cook or sharpen. But he really doesn't seem to know a lot.
What's the conclusion? Everything the guy writes and says needs to be taken with a fistful of salt.
Cheers,
Mag