Why does everybody worry how much a liner lock can hold on the spine? How many people do you know who cut with the spin of the knife? Or wack people with them? Even if it does fail, your pushing down. Back and forth sawing actions also dont generate much energy. Somebody care to explain why everybody performs a spine wack test or wants to balance a car on the spine of their knife blade?
The simplest answer for the stength argument is leverage. Whenever you are trying to cut something for which you need a decent amount of force and you do it by pushing the tip in first, you are levering against the pivot. Imagine you are cutting through some thick, dense cardboard, which offers too large a resistance for your wriststrength to cut through it. So you push in the tip and you cut by a rocking motion, levering the tip against the material just like you do when you cut a can open with a can-opener (or a knife for that matter). If you leverage with your bodyweight, you can EASILY apply a force of a few hundred pounds at the pivot depending on the length of the lever (handle) which is why a rating in pounds per inch blade is so important. You also have to realize, unlike a slipjoint which will fail immediately, the locked folder will fail suddenly, far increasing the risk of injury in such a case.
The spine wack test has nothing to do with strength, like Allen said. If the lock does not engage sufficiently or tends to slip, it will be defeated not by strength but by being "jostled" around a bit. That is all that you are testing for. I had a lockback that simply wasn't engaging deeply enough (which you don't see, unless you dissassemble the folder). The lockbar was catching enough that it wouldn't close by putting weight on the spine, but one sharp tap with out much force will have the lockbar "bounce" a bit and it would slip out of engagement and fold the knife. Actually, quite frightening when you see a locked knife flip closed at a sharp tap on the spine.