I Think I Did the Impossible

Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
3,178
Back in '98 I bought a Glock 21C - .45 ACP and a "compensator" consisting of two slots milled in the top of the barrel with the slide opened up to let them vent. It was sturdy, reliable, and accurate. It also fed cheap ammo just as well as the good stuff and I put many thousands of such rounds through it over the years.

Today I participated in a postal match on another site. It had been a while since I'd shot the old Glock at anything other than the standard plinking targets and I was curious to see how it would do when group size counted.

It didn't do as well as I would've liked. Target was a piece of printer paper. Course of fire was eight rounds at five yards, twelve rounds at seven yards, fourteen rounds at fifteen yards, and sixteen rounds at twenty yards.

g21.jpg


And that was the best out of three. Not bad, but I shot noticeably better with a year-old G34 and ammo that was just as cheap right afterwards, and the G34's trigger is nowhere nearly as light and smooth as the G21's is. There is a problem with the gun.

It had been behaving oddly for the last six months or so. It was fouling so badly around the throat area that nothing short of JB Bore Paste would remove it, and not without a lot of work. I chalked that up to cheap ammo until I ran a box of the good stuff through...same thing. It hiccups occasionally. It never used to do that. It cycles sluggishly sometimes. At first I thought that the cold weather was congealing the grease, but the sluggishness continued when the grease was replaced by oil.

Tonight I gave it the most thorough detail cleaning that it had ever seen, and bad things started to appear. Wear. Galling. Rattling. The recoil spring guide rod looks like a dog has been chewing on it. A close inspection of the bore revealed a surface that looked like the bad sections of I-5; the metal seemed to be almost peeling up in the grooves. There are several spots that look suspiciously like either very weird pits or very minor cracks around the vents.

I broke out the GI Muzzle Wear Gauge (a round of loaded ammo) and gauged the muzzle.

muzzle.jpg


Yep, the mouth of the case is pretty much sitting on the muzzle. By comparison, my G30 (which has maybe 1000-2000 rounds through it) shows about a 2mm gap between the case mouth and the muzzle using the same round.

Well, that certainly would explain a loss of accuracy and stubborn fouling, wouldn't it?

I think that I wore my Glock out, and it only took me seven years. I lost track of the round count several years ago but I'd guess it (conservatively) to be at over 20,000 rounds. There was about a two year period where it saw 300+ rounds nearly every weekend, and had I known how to shoot back then, I might've gotten some benefit from all that shooting. :o On the plus side, the trigger is broken in to the point where it doesn't even feel like a Glock anymore.

So, it looks like a new barrel at the bare minimum, and I'm thinking the recoil spring and guide rod need to go too. I'll take a close look at the internals later but they seem to check out so far. The frame and slide themselves are fine I think, although I have half a mind to just mail the whole thing to Smyrna to get their recommendations. I may have exceeded the pistol's designed lifespan at this point.

Now's your chance to weigh in:

Factory barrel or aftermarket? (I don't compete. I don't shoot unjacketed ammunition through it, nor do I plan on ever doing so.)
Ported or non? (Non's cheaper and I don't think that a .45 ACP really needs porting in the first place, but it may look a bit odd with a ported slide and nonported barrel.)
Recommended place for parts? My first choice is Glockmeister but there may be a better place that I don't know about.

Or should I just keep running it for a while longer? The pistol's not really keeping up with me anymore, but it's still more than adequate for nailing beer cans and clay pigeons.

I ought to put up some pics of the rest of that pistol sometime. Some people think that I just beat on khukuris. ;)
 
My suggestion? Buy a 1911 (come on someone had to say it). :D Sorry bud, I can't help you out any in the Glock department. That's an impressive feat to wear out a pistol in seven years.
 
Wow.

Wear out a glock, and in 45 no less.

I'd get a factory none-comped tube for it. But I'm prejudiced against them.
 
Sounds like a Barstow barrel and a set of new springs (all of them) is in order (Wolff perhaps?), but first I would contact a Glock armorer in your area as far as everything goes. Safety first.
 
Think of this as an opportunity... to replace the worn-out Glock frame with a Sig frame. If the slide won't fit correctly, you may as well replace it with a Sig slide at the same time.

Mags in such a worn-out gun could be a prob. See if Sig mags fit in the new frame better, I feel certain they will.


Seriously, Dave, it doesn't surprise me that you wore out a Glock. It DOES surprise me you don't shoot a 1911.... now's the time. Don't throw good money after bad. Keep the glock for canoe trips, and build yourself a 1911 .45.

Build it, don't buy it. You of all people can- save paying a 'smith and the personal satisfaction will be way worth it.


Mike
 
That's pretty decent shootin' by my standards, Dave.
Isn't the life of most barrels somewhere in the 10-20K rd range?
Wolff springs are a quality product, as are Barstow barrels.
I have Wolff springs in my .40 CZ 75B, and it runs great.
I am not really a Glock guy, having sold my G27, and replaced it with a CZ 2075 RAMI, which fits my hand better. The Glock shot and ran well, it just wasn't well suited to my small hands.

DaddyDett
 
Good shooting !!!!:thumbup:

One of these days do one at 25y with your CZ52. I'd like to see how they compare. I find I can shoot a really nice group at 20 yards with mine, but at 25 it spreads out a lot. More than the difference between 15 and 20. I'm wondering if I need a new barrel
 
Doesn't sound right to me. There is no good reason for the 45acp version to be less durable than the 9mm Glocks. Some people are running those (G17's)into the hundreds of thousands of rounds with no measurable wear.

I'd send it back to Smyrna for inspection describing the symptoms. That is, of course, if you still fancy the pistol. I'd stay factory barrel and parts too. JMHO...and yes, I love 1911's, but Glocks are more reliable on the whole.

Jeff
 
Another barrel (Federal) will run you less than $100. Then you'll just need a spring and recoil guide. I'm thinking well under $140, including shipping, and 2 minute install to be back to gold. I would expect a maximum useful service life of 10,000 rounds/barrel, so I think you done good. ;)

John
 
I've got a Glock 21......and I bang mine up regularly!! :eek: so I'd say get a new barrel (non-ported) and live with the slots in the slide.

The recoil spring guide rod...I've been thinking of getting a metal one,now I believe I will! you should too.

No need to get a safety inspec,Glocks have gone through 100,000+ rounds you just shot out you barrel!

And sorry but the 1911 sucks,had one as my first large cal pistol-it kicks!! so much so I traded it for a super blackhawk .44 mag!! :eek: plus it came broke,couldn't hit a two foot box at seven feet! my advice? get a P-38 it cost the same but prob works better! :grumpy:
 
Thanks for the recommendations.

When cleaning my Glocks, I use either the supplied plastic cleaning rod or an Otis kit. Neither of these are rough on barrels. I don't think that I wore out the barrel by overzealous cleaning but I suppose that it's possible. I'm also quite religious about cleaning from the breech end, which makes me wonder just how worn the throat is. It doesn't look all that bad by eye, but neither did the muzzle, and you should have seen how badly the throat was fouling...

Devo, do you have a source for G17's going 100,000? After that many rounds I would expect even a rimfire to be showing some wear. I don't know exactly how many rounds I've put through this pistol but it's way less than that. Probably less than 30,000, definitely more than 20,000.

HD? I've shot my CZ's at 25 and 50. I don't like to talk about it. :o The triggers really mess me up. The next time I bring one out, I'll shoot a similar course with it and post the target.

There will be no 1911's or SIGs in my collection. Fair or not, the M11's that I used in the navy were nice to look at, pleasant to hold, and never seemed to group, which left me with a bad opinion of them. I don't really have anything against 1911's but they're not my thing. I did actually build one back in the late '90's and wound up giving it to my brother. Not bad, but not for me.

I think I'm going to go with a factory nonported BBL. Still looking at Wolff springs.
 
And an update:

The poor G21 failed two points on a function check. It's going to have to go to a pro. :( We're beyond a simple barrel and spring replacement as far as I'm concerned.

I hope it's not completely worn out. I really like this pistol.
 
Keep us informed as to how it goes, I am interested as that I am now loading 10mm for my G20 and have put a little bit of .45 through my G30.

I am in the mood to go re-spring my 1911 and buy another Wilson mag.
 
I've does business with Glockmeister and trust him. If you want another source for barrels though, check Brownells and Midway. A $500 to $600 Glock is way more reliable from the factory than a 1911 of the same price. Also, the service from Glock, should you have to send it in, is topnotch. Everytime I look at those 1911s, I convince myself not to buy one. You would need to spend $1000+ IMHO to have a 1911 that is somewhat reliable.

Oh, oh I see 1911 fan mortar rounds incoming.:D
 
*Sigh* Sorry Dave, I'm not trying to hijack your thread, but there're a few things here that need to be set straight. 1911's don't kick any more than any other big bore auto, not in my hands anyway. 'Recoil' is completely subjective however, so if the gun doesn't fit your hand of course it will be uncomfortable to shoot. That's why there are so many models out there to choose from. 1911's are not in any way inherently inaccurate. There are plenty of poorly built examples out there that can't hit the broad side of a barn, but they are not an indication of the merit the platform, they're simply examples of a good design that's been poorly executed. The same holds true for reliablity. A well built, well maintained 1911 is perfectly reliable. My new Colt has now gone for nearly 400 rounds without one failure. It costs $750 new, yes that's more than a Glock. I can't hit the a thing with a Glock though so the extra $250 was well worth it. If the platform doesn't work for you fine, I respect that. The Glock doesn't work for me but I don't run it down. If those funky grips fit your hands great! Don't put down a great platform just because it's not your cup of tea.
 
Roadrunner said:
*Sigh* Sorry Dave, I'm not trying to hijack your thread, but there're a few things here that need to be set straight. 1911's don't kick any more than any other big bore auto, not in my hands anyway. 'Recoil' is completely subjective however, so if the gun doesn't fit your hand of course it will be uncomfortable to shoot. That's why there are so many models out there to choose from. 1911's are not in any way inherently inaccurate. There are plenty of poorly built examples out there that can't hit the broad side of a barn, but they are not an indication of the merit the platform, they're simply examples of a good design that's been poorly executed. The same holds true for reliablity. A well built, well maintained 1911 is perfectly reliable. My new Colt has now gone for nearly 400 rounds without one failure. It costs $750 new, yes that's more than a Glock. I can't hit the a thing with a Glock though so the extra $250 was well worth it. If the platform doesn't work for you fine, I respect that. The Glock doesn't work for me but I don't run it down. If those funky grips fit your hands great! Don't put down a great platform just because it's not your cup of tea.

What's true:the 1911's bore is higher then the Glock hence it kicks more ;) add to that the polymer frame on the Glock sokes up some more kick so all-in-all the 1911 can be damned uncomfortable to shoot.

What's personal:lotsa training and lotsa ammo can cure this-if you like the gun,I don't it's like a kicking mule to me,if I dump a few hundred rounds I'd probably "get" it but I won't.
 
RR, you're talking about subjective recoil, and it's different for different people.

However, it is factually correct that a polymer pistol will transmit less recoil than
a similar metal-framed pistol, due to grip flex.

John
 
Glock vs 1911 on a Blade board?? hmm didnt see it coming:yawn:

OHHH well I will weigh in on this by asking a VERY simple question...

If you have BOTH and BOTH are out of bullets, which one is the easist to beat a man to death with??

A Grock that is made from some type of plastic??

OR

JMB's masterpiece that is made from METAL???



unpleasant dreams:D
 
Leatherface said:
Glock vs 1911 on a Blade board?? hmm didnt see it coming.:yawn:

LF that's why we were given this forum and why we should be so grateful to Spark for setting it up for us.:thumbup: :cool: :D
Uncle Bill let us post about anything at all on the HI Forum much to Spark's displeasure. When he overhauled BFC this last time he gave us this marvelous place to play. I'm sure he knew what he was getting into and can you imagine the bandwidth this forum must use up on a daily basis? :eek:
It sure wasn't something Spark had to do. That's the big reason I harp about staying on topic and keeping the hijacked threads off the other side of our forum.
I've been pretty slack about it the last while.:(
 
Back
Top