Thank you very much JNewell!! I appreciate your comment and your valued opinion. As I said in the thread I am sure that many will disagree!! And I welcome that!!
No I encourage it!! But in your very kind rebuttal you note that the Sebenza -type pivot should be included.. I agree but that design "Pivot" is hmm at least 26 years old!! The original design of the Sebenza including the Sebenza type pivot is old school! (BUT GOES ON TO THIS DAY IN THE 21) as it should!!
But I am not so much referring to the "OLD STYLE" Pivot as much as the entire design of the knife. That is the Umnumzaan itself. Not since the introduction of the "New Design" in the summer of 1996 have we seen the innovation and design of the Umnumzaan. There must be a reason that it was chose to be knife of the Year at blade in 2008 and despite the many changes since,continues to be one of the top sellers in the CRK line up!
First, personally, I think a prerequisite for design pinnacle in CRK knives would include the Sebenza-type pivot - so that would let the Umnu (which I like a great deal) out right there.
Second, and this is even more subjective, I owned one of the first Umnus made and really did not like the ergos on that knife. I disliked them enough that it is one of very, very few CRK knives I've sold.

I later bought one of the last pre-"LBS" (it isn't, I know...) Umnus and liked that enough that I bought a second (which turned out to have been made on exactly the same day - amazing coincidence, considering they came from dealers 2K miles apart).
At the end of the day, though, it's all good. :thumbup:

[/QUOTE]