Yep, "hamon". Known in English as a "temper line". The Japanese prized hamons that had nice pretty waves or curliques in the hamon itself, and had names for each that translated to things like "turbulent seas" or whatever. My opinion is they got a wee bit anal about it, BUT there are good reasons for not having a dead straight hamon either.
Basically, if the hamon is a "flatline" it forms a single "seam" between the harder and softer zones. Under extreme use it can part right at the seam, you end up holding the spine and handle and the cutting edge is still embedded in the wood.
This is considered suboptimal
.
By making the line "waver" you increase the strength of the inevitable seam.
I've been doing a bit of thunking as to how this relates to Khukuris. I've got a sneaking suspicion I know why nobody's seen a Khuk split at the hamon. What I think is, because they pour water on one side and then the other, the hamon isn't quite at the same place on each side. I think if we took a "cat scan slice" of a khuk and did Rockwells, we'd find that the hard part of one side continues a bit further up the side than the other, and that there'd be some softer steel left in a "V-notch" internally near the hamon. If I'm right, it means there's really TWO hamons, one at each side and since each hamon is a "seam" that doesn't quite line up with each other, each seam is reinforced by NON-seam steel on the other side.
If I'm right, the hamon line on each side of a khukuri will be slightly different. If we cared about pretty hamons this might be seen as a downside; as is, it may be a key reason these suckers don't spit their edges.
Jim