- Joined
- Nov 27, 1998
- Messages
- 2,602
If you look at the popular knives of yore, the steel was more-often-than-not brightly finished, and they were handled in beautiful natural materials, polished metals and attractively colored celluloids, etc.
So why the current trend toward dull, drab, belligerent-looking "tactical" cutlery with overblown military motifs and juvenile marketing slogans (""Death is our Only Competition," etc.) that look like something broken off of an old rototiller?
What is it about modern consumer culture that exalts the current crop of "combat" knives above the comparatively benign looking, colorful and moderately sized offerings that served our ancestors so well during the last century?
It can't be solely based on performance. A high-performance knife is still high-performance whether it's dressed in a party gown or a camo mall-ninja outfit. Likewise, the latest synthetic materials can be made in any color, but the most popular continue to be various shades of dull.
In the past, a kid would be far more inclined to buy a small pocketknife with colorful scales, even though large synthetic black-handled jacks and Barlows were often a cheaper option.
(( better to ask before using someone else's kids to make your point ))
So, what changed? Have we become so confused, fearful and insecure as a culture that we seek out the illusion of empowerment by purchasing utilitarian pocket tools that look like implements of war? After well over a decade of this bizarre fashion trend, one begins to wonder who the real "sheeple" are when it comes to knives.
Thoughts?
So why the current trend toward dull, drab, belligerent-looking "tactical" cutlery with overblown military motifs and juvenile marketing slogans (""Death is our Only Competition," etc.) that look like something broken off of an old rototiller?
What is it about modern consumer culture that exalts the current crop of "combat" knives above the comparatively benign looking, colorful and moderately sized offerings that served our ancestors so well during the last century?
It can't be solely based on performance. A high-performance knife is still high-performance whether it's dressed in a party gown or a camo mall-ninja outfit. Likewise, the latest synthetic materials can be made in any color, but the most popular continue to be various shades of dull.
In the past, a kid would be far more inclined to buy a small pocketknife with colorful scales, even though large synthetic black-handled jacks and Barlows were often a cheaper option.
(( better to ask before using someone else's kids to make your point ))
So, what changed? Have we become so confused, fearful and insecure as a culture that we seek out the illusion of empowerment by purchasing utilitarian pocket tools that look like implements of war? After well over a decade of this bizarre fashion trend, one begins to wonder who the real "sheeple" are when it comes to knives.
Thoughts?
Last edited by a moderator: