I agree that a lot of people get into the .25" blades before they know anything about knife geometry, or what they want out of a blade. A lot of it has to do with inexperienced people doing long, rediculous reviews on YouTube doing nothing but chopping, and batoning saying how much of a beast it is. It's totally obvious that a person lacks any experience at all when they compare the functionality of a .25" blade to a .188", or .125" blade. .25"s are in a class all their own. I own several, and have handled more. The thickies have the same purpose as any other knife... To cut and to do it well, but the difference is doing it without breaking. This is going to change the functionality, but remember when choosing a thickie you're not wanting a scalpel. You just want something that will NOT break, which opens up a lot of other tasks like prying, breaking, digging, etc. I started my knife study with a ka-bar, bk7, bk2, a RAT(ESEE)5, an Ontario ranger 4, a Tops tracker, steel eagle 7, and shadow hunter, and now a bk9, 15, 17, and 11 as well as all the ESEE models. I've learned a lot about geometry over the past few years. I'll rank the thickies I've handled like this: any .25" blade made by Tops is useless as a knife; the Ontario Ranger FFG had a great edge, but the blade height was way too high, and ergonomics were awful; the RAT/ESEE 5 is the second best thickie out there due to low blade height, great ergonomics, and geometry; the absolute best thickie on the market is the BK2. The BK2 has perfect ergonomics, excellent shape and blade height, plus it has the geometry that makes it what it's supposed to be... a great cutting tool. It's a beast of an actual knife, and not just a cool looking thick piece of steel. For these reasons it will not fall out of favor as the best thickie to have. That said... I think I need another one. I'm starting to miss it.