I read
I am inferring
154CM......S30V
I thought
I just bought
I'm kinda confused
I absolutely have to
Well, S30V should be compared to CPM154 as it will have more wear resistance than 154CM (ATS-34) .. blah, blah, blah --- puke. :jerkit:
OK ENOUGH! It's time fellow forum members to educate yourself about blade geometry verses selecting the right knife steel for your particular type of application.
Start at this link:
http://zknives.com/knives/articles/knifesteelfaq.shtml
"
For example, it is possible to make a hard-use "tactical/utility" knife from ATS-34 (154CM). To make sure the ATS-34 will take the kind of stresses it might see in this environment, the edge might be left a bit thick (sacrificing cutting performance), or the hardness brought down a touch (sacrificing strength and wear resistance), or both. If the same maker moves to much-tougher S30V, he might be able to thin out the edge, thin out the entire knife, and raise the hardness, bringing up performance as a whole.
Moving to differentially-tempered 5160 might allow the maker to re-profile even more for performance. If we're talking about a fighter, moving from 1095 to 3V might allow the maker to make the knife much thinner, lighter, and faster, while significantly increasing cutting performance and maintaining edge integrity.
So to really take advantage of the higher-performance steel, we want the knifemaker to adjust the knife design to the steel, wherever he thinks it's appropriate. If a knifemaker offers the same knife in multiple steels, ask about what the characteristics are in each steel, and the how's and why's of where the design has changed to accomodate each steel offered."
ref: Knife Steel FAQ: Joe Talmadge, 2005
"Steel costs, great steel costs more; poor knife sharping skills -- priceless"