- Joined
- Sep 1, 2013
- Messages
- 842
What single knife design has gone through the most revisions? As in, a design base that the maker/company is continually upgrading and trying to improve through feedback from customers or themselves, as opposed to starting from scratch with a brand new design base -- a knife that is still being sold under its original name, but has been massively improved through feedback and upgrades. Like, if you compared the newest to the oldest version, the newest version might have a different/improved pivot, screws (Size, alignment, etc.), different/improved blade thickness and grind, different/improved frame thickness, perhaps a slightly modified blade design, different/improved detent, different/improved lock design - all aimed at improving whatever the knife is commonly being used for.
I'm guessing that, for modern folders, the Sebenza and Strider SMF and SNG would be the best examples of this? It sounds like the "midtechs", or "standard" SMF and SNG have seen a lot of improvements. While there are tons of custom designs on the SMF and SNG base as well, I'm not sure how many revisions they go through, or how much "in use" feedback they would get.
ZT seemed to bring out a lot of revisions for their 300, 550 and 560 models (Not sure how often they bring out revisions for their newest designs. I just remember reading a lot about revisions for those models.).
As for more traditional style-knives, certainly the various SAK designs & Opinel? While the Buck 110 has been around for a long time, my impression is that it hasn't changed or improved that much? It still seems to have the fragile tip, it uses pins instead of screws, washers, pivot construction, weight and grip seem to be slight issues, etc.
I'm guessing that, for modern folders, the Sebenza and Strider SMF and SNG would be the best examples of this? It sounds like the "midtechs", or "standard" SMF and SNG have seen a lot of improvements. While there are tons of custom designs on the SMF and SNG base as well, I'm not sure how many revisions they go through, or how much "in use" feedback they would get.
ZT seemed to bring out a lot of revisions for their 300, 550 and 560 models (Not sure how often they bring out revisions for their newest designs. I just remember reading a lot about revisions for those models.).
As for more traditional style-knives, certainly the various SAK designs & Opinel? While the Buck 110 has been around for a long time, my impression is that it hasn't changed or improved that much? It still seems to have the fragile tip, it uses pins instead of screws, washers, pivot construction, weight and grip seem to be slight issues, etc.