Izula VS Becker Necker: my debate

[randomlooker]

It's actually a pro in my book, less weight, smaller print, easier to conceal plus it falls under 3" WA state law.

Washington doesn't have a length limit. Individual cities and counties might, but not the state as a whole.


Oh, and Izula II. Slightly longer handle makes for a more comfortable grip than the Izula. Which itself is better with the optional micarta handle scales. And can be used to open beers if you know the trick.

 

[nutnfancyfan]

personally i dont mind the smaller blade, though i do like the iizy 2 better because of the longer handle. i have to try out the eskabar though

 

[NixKustoms]

personally i dont mind the smaller blade, though i do like the iizy 2 better because of the longer handle. i have to try out the eskabar though

You can find them on the internets for less than $40 shipped!

 

[Talley1013]

have them both. I like the izula way better

 

[bluey]

I was lucky and picked up the original Becker Necker years ago. The original sheath is much better. Tight fit and no noise.

Ahh... good point I was just about to post that my becker necker doesn't rattle at all in its sheath...but yes, it is the original BK&T rather than K-Bar. Totally love this knife but have been eyeing off the eskabar....OTOH the Izula looks sweet too .....

 

[Haze240]

Eskabar ftw.

 

[mike81695]

You really can't go wrong with either one. But like the one guy said, the Izula warranty can't be beat and you can find it for almost the same price so....

 

[CQC15]

Thanks for the info guys. I decided to keep the Izula