nick681
Gold Member
- Joined
- Nov 22, 1999
- Messages
- 1,922
After reading this thread I thought I should chime in and give Grunt's point of view. I have been an Infantryman for over 14 years now and have been to the field in some of the worst conditions imaginable all over the world. I have also owned all types of knives.
For the average user I agree with what many people here have said. Most any high quality knife will perform well and do all that is asked of it and probably more. The whole argument "my knife can beat up your knife" is pretty silly for the most part, I agree.
There are many great knife makers who make wonderful products and I would take them camping, use them around the house, or just enjoy them. Many of these products will perform admirably by any measure and do so for a good price. The number of high quality makers whose knives I like is countless.
Having said that there are only two makers whose knives I will carry in the field, Busse(to include Swamp Rat Knife Works)and Strider. I own and use both. These two makers have a common goal which they approach via different paths, to make a knife that will not fail. These makers stand behind their products, period. In addition to that both makers are responsive to customer needs and demands. Also both of these companies support the military above and beyond what some other makers do.
I however disagree with some things that have been said here.
I agree with this to a point. An Infantrymans tool should strong, sharp, and have a good sheath. The tool in question however should be heavy enough to get the job done and of as high a quality as the individual can afford. Both of my grandfathers taught me to buy the highest qualiy tools you can afford and take care of them.
My bottom line is simple my needs go beyond almost all other users in the knife buying public. I buy buy knives that I feel confidence in both the product and manufacturer. The knives I carry have proven themselves to me personally. If you want to accuse me of being on the Busse or Strider bandwagon so be it. If a maker out there wants to send me a knife to test and review in the field I will do so and give an objective opinion. If some one else can provide the same level of product performance, customer support/warranty, I will step up to the plate and say so. However if their knives fail to measure up I will say that as well.
Sorry for the rant but I hate when people bring Grunts into the matter. I am constantly suprised at some of the ideas people have about military knife use.
For the average user I agree with what many people here have said. Most any high quality knife will perform well and do all that is asked of it and probably more. The whole argument "my knife can beat up your knife" is pretty silly for the most part, I agree.
There are many great knife makers who make wonderful products and I would take them camping, use them around the house, or just enjoy them. Many of these products will perform admirably by any measure and do so for a good price. The number of high quality makers whose knives I like is countless.
Having said that there are only two makers whose knives I will carry in the field, Busse(to include Swamp Rat Knife Works)and Strider. I own and use both. These two makers have a common goal which they approach via different paths, to make a knife that will not fail. These makers stand behind their products, period. In addition to that both makers are responsive to customer needs and demands. Also both of these companies support the military above and beyond what some other makers do.
I however disagree with some things that have been said here.
A utility knife is precisely what I need. Any fantasies about knife fighting are just that, fantasies. Anyone who picks a field knife for it's "fighting abilities",ie thrusts, snap cuts, grip transitions, or any of the other drivel I have read about here on the forums and in magazines they need help, in the form of an NCO to kick them in the pants. All of those things are fine if that is your hobby but not for military use. If I have to stab someone with a knife it will be attached to the end of my rifle. It is called a bayonet, and the point on that is just what the doctor ordered. A stout, fixed blade, mid sized utility knife is the most useful thing to have in my experience. And if as a last resort I had stab someone with it the could cancel Christmas, Ramadan, etc.think the main reason Busse are not written about in Tactical Knive Magazine's is because they are a 100% utility knife. The point is not correct for military people. If I wanted a tactical fighting knife my first choice would be a Mad Dog ATAK or a Ka-Bar.
An infantryman's tool should be light, cheap, strong, and sharp with an excellent sheath. The BK-7 does all this for about 50 dollars on the 'net. Edge retention is not a major concern for most folks, but ease of resharpening IS.
I agree with this to a point. An Infantrymans tool should strong, sharp, and have a good sheath. The tool in question however should be heavy enough to get the job done and of as high a quality as the individual can afford. Both of my grandfathers taught me to buy the highest qualiy tools you can afford and take care of them.
My bottom line is simple my needs go beyond almost all other users in the knife buying public. I buy buy knives that I feel confidence in both the product and manufacturer. The knives I carry have proven themselves to me personally. If you want to accuse me of being on the Busse or Strider bandwagon so be it. If a maker out there wants to send me a knife to test and review in the field I will do so and give an objective opinion. If some one else can provide the same level of product performance, customer support/warranty, I will step up to the plate and say so. However if their knives fail to measure up I will say that as well.
Sorry for the rant but I hate when people bring Grunts into the matter. I am constantly suprised at some of the ideas people have about military knife use.