Johanning's Modified A-8

I want to make clear that I find this thread very interesting and informative, and I appreciate the information provided by all. However this type of argument doesn't help:

Cliff Stamp said:
Originally Posted by Satrang
I'm not saying they are identical.


At first you did :


Quote:
Originally Posted by Satrang
The modified A-8 is Chipper Knife, commonly used in wood chipping equipment. The legendary INFI is the same stuff.



-Cliff

I understood "same stuff" to be a reference to "chipper knife", which I inferred to be a broad category/class/type of steel ("commonly used in the wood chipping equipment"). With this understanding the two referenced steels are subsets of the same set, and there is no mandatory inference of identical equivalency between the two. Cliff you make good points and really don't need to resort to this type of argument. It does nothing to advance the discussion, but is mere semantics. I'll getoff my soap box now. ;)
 
metallicat said:
I It does nothing to advance the discussion, but is mere semantics. I'll getoff my soap box now. ;)

Semantics are the core of clear communication.

Phil
 
metallicat said:
I want to make clear that I find this thread very interesting and informative, and I appreciate the information provided by all. However this type of argument doesn't help:

I understood "same stuff" to be a reference to "chipper knife", which I inferred to be a broad category/class/type of steel ("commonly used in the wood chipping equipment"). With this understanding the two referenced steels are subsets of the same set, and there is no mandatory inference of identical equivalency between the two. Cliff you make good points and really don't need to resort to this type of argument. It does nothing to advance the discussion, but is mere semantics. I'll getoff my soap box now. ;)

I have to disagree here. Someone says Spring steel or bearing steel means nothing unless you attach a spec to it. Are they actually using 52100 for their bearings are they actually using 5160 or 6150 for the spring or maybe some other steel we don't know about. Well, cliff does have a point. First Satrang says they are the same and then he says they are not.

I would say that the steels are very similar if all of the microconstituents are the same. However, what I see is different steels that happen to have the same amount of Chromium and Carbon. Gee most Stainless steels have the same amount of Chromium and are pretty close in Carbon Content. lt's just call them all 440B. Here are all three steels compared side by side. Unless I am missing something MA8 and K329 are similar to each other and could almost be the same barring chemical composition tests. But to anyone who reads this it is obvious that they are not the same as INFI. ModA8 has 3% different microconstituents and INFI has over 2% microconstituents that are different. That is narly 5% of the steel that is not the same. That kind of chemistry makes a huge difference. Don't believe me, take a look at the difference in strength between Beta Ti, 6Al4V Ti and 3Al2V Ti. They are considerable different in strengths yet they differ chemically very little.

Johannings ModA8 INFI K329

0.55% Carbon 0.5% C 0.52
0.30% Mang 0.30
0.95% Silicon 0.95
8.25% Chromium 8.25% Cr 8.0 %
1.25% Molybdnm 1.3% Moly 1.4%
1.25% Tungsten
0.36% Vana 0.45%
0.74% Nickel
0.11% Nitrogen
0.95% Cobalt

So far this has proven nothing. I will admit I'd like to see ModA8 bing used same goes for Bohlers K329 to see how they are. I would love to own a Johanning Tac knife, since I have never heard one negative thing about them, they just run a little small for me.
 
Cobalt, I'll try not to be argumentative and I do see your point. The part of the equation you are missing is the range of the elements listed. You cannot compare chemistry of steel as absolute since all steel is produced with ranges. For example. K329:

Carbon: 0.48/0.55
Chromium: 7.6/8.4
Silicon: 0.8/1.05
Manganese: 0.3./0.50
Vanadium: 0.35/0.50
Molybdenum: 1.25/1.60

Some of the differences you see in the chemistries are actually well within the melt ranges of the material. This is a situation where there is no absolute chemistry for any steel. One person sees 0.5 carbon and one sees 0.52 and thinks these are different.

I can see where my comment on them being the same caused confusion. I meant and should have clarified they are both Chipper type materials. I still contend that the Infi chemistry above is either off or Infi is no longer K329 and some other Chipper variety. One of the reasons a company uses their own trade name is to open their purchasing to other vendors even if the material from the other vendor is not identical.
 
Out of curiosity, has Jerry Busse ever stated that all INFI is from the same source or is domestic product? I would like to know if he has it made to spec by different mills, or if it has always come from one source.

Also, has he ever said that the composition of INFI has always remained the same? I just want to know if he said anything about these in the past that I might have missed.
 
Satrang said:
Cobalt, I'll try not to be argumentative and I do see your point. The part of the equation you are missing is the range of the elements listed. You cannot compare chemistry of steel as absolute since all steel is produced with ranges. For example. K329:

Carbon: 0.48/0.55
Chromium: 7.6/8.4
Silicon: 0.8/1.05
Manganese: 0.3./0.50
Vanadium: 0.35/0.50
Molybdenum: 1.25/1.60

Some of the differences you see in the chemistries are actually well within the melt ranges of the material. This is a situation where there is no absolute chemistry for any steel. One person sees 0.5 carbon and one sees 0.52 and thinks these are different.

I can see where my comment on them being the same caused confusion. I meant and should have clarified they are both Chipper type materials. I still contend that the Infi chemistry above is either off or Infi is no longer K329 and some other Chipper variety. One of the reasons a company uses their own trade name is to open their purchasing to other vendors even if the material from the other vendor is not identical.


No the Chemistry of INFI is not off or changed. It is what it shows and Busse has agreed with that exact elemental analysis. So how do you explain 5 micronconstituent differences and they do change the properties of the steel. These steels are different make no mistake about it.

I read what you wronte but you still have not proven that they are the same. Show me a Bohler spec sheet with the exact same chemical analysis and I will agree until then to say that INFI and Kwhatever are the same is erroneous. Now K329 may be a great steel in of itself as is ModA8 but that makes no difference.
 
LOL If the differences listed are "splitting hairs" then there are exactly two different types of steel in the world---440A and 1095--the "parent steels" of all others. Everything else is just a variation of these two... :jerkit:
 
Perhaps it's worth taking a look at the differences between INFI and K329/Chipper in detail.

C, Cr, Mo, V
No discrepancies here. INFI (as tested) falls comfortably into the ranges for Chipper types.

Mn
K329 call for 0.48/0.55% manganese, while INFI does not list any. This doesn't mean that INFI has no Mn, since the sulfur and phosphorus levels of INFI are also unlisted but I'm sure it contains S and P as impurities. All modern steels contain Mn, so I would be very surprised if INFI truly has none.

Si & Co
INFI seems to have cobalt replace the silicon in the Chipper grades. Mod-INFI then, is presumably even closer to Chipper.

Ni
0.74% in INFI, and kept below 0.4% in K329.

N
INFI has 0.11% and Chipper doesn't say. Neither do the datasheets for S30V and 3V, though nobody doubts the nitrogen in CPM steels.

So the only real differences are the cobalt/silicon and nickel. Both are small enough that any metallurgist would categorize INFI in the Chipper family. Splitting hairs? Maybe. But take a look at the spec for W-2 and you begin to realize how 'lenient' some of these families are.
 
SteelDriver said:
Perhaps it's worth taking a look at the differences between INFI and K329/Chipper in detail.

C, Cr, Mo, V
No discrepancies here. INFI (as tested) falls comfortably into the ranges for Chipper types.

Mn
K329 call for 0.48/0.55% manganese, while INFI does not list any. This doesn't mean that INFI has no Mn, since the sulfur and phosphorus levels of INFI are also unlisted but I'm sure it contains S and P as impurities. All modern steels contain Mn, so I would be very surprised if INFI truly has none.This may well be, but the content of INFI was determined by a chemical analysis, not someones impression, so how was that missed?

Si & Co
INFI seems to have cobalt replace the silicon in the Chipper grades. Mod-INFI then, is presumably even closer to Chipper. Maybe so, not sure what Mod INFI is not sure anyone really knows

Ni
0.74% in INFI, and kept below 0.4% in K329.K329 has NONE according to the spec sheets, so where are you comming up with it?

N
INFI has 0.11% and Chipper doesn't say. Neither do the datasheets for S30V and 3V, though nobody doubts the nitrogen in CPM steels.Where is it in K329? We aren't talking CPM are we.

So the only real differences are the cobalt/silicon and nickel. Both are small enough that any metallurgist would categorize INFI in the Chipper family. Splitting hairs? Maybe. But take a look at the spec for W-2 and you begin to realize how 'lenient' some of these families are.

Maybe INFI could be categorized in the chipper family but that wasn't the point. The point is that they are ot the same steel and Satrang keeps on trying to state that they are the same. THEY ARE NOT. The Added Ni gives added toughness, the added Cobalt gives it added wear resistance and the Nitrogen does something. And the way the Nitrogen is included is different as well and this has been discussed in the past, way past. So once again we are back to yes they are same family, maybe, but not the same steel. Different microconstituents and HT make it a different steel. I will admit that K329 is the closest a steel has ever been to INFI that I have seen.



Johannings ModA8.... INFI............ K329

0.55% Carbon...........0.5% C......... 0.52
0.30% Mang ................................0.30
0.95% Silicon.............................. .0.95
8.25% Chromium ......8.25% Cr ........8.0 %
1.25% Molybdnm .....1.3% Moly........1.4%
1.25% Tungsten
.............................0.36% Vana.....0.45%
.............................0.74% Nickel
.............................0.11% Nitrogen
.............................0.95% Cobalt
 
Satrang said:
Cobalt, I'll try not to be argumentative and I do see your point. The part of the equation you are missing is the range of the elements listed. You cannot compare chemistry of steel as absolute since all steel is produced with ranges. For example. K329:.

I agree. There is no absolute, but ranges. Still there can be no range when none exists like Ni, N, Co.


Satrang said:
Some of the differences you see in the chemistries are actually well within the melt ranges of the material. This is a situation where there is no absolute chemistry for any steel. One person sees 0.5 carbon and one sees 0.52 and thinks these are different. .

Agreed, no argument here.


Satrang said:
I can see where my comment on them being the same caused confusion. I meant and should have clarified they are both Chipper type materials. I still contend that the Infi chemistry above is either off or Infi is no longer K329 and some other Chipper variety. One of the reasons a company uses their own trade name is to open their purchasing to other vendors even if the material from the other vendor is not identical.

INFI is not off, just different. Is it a chipper variety, yes, but possibly adapted to the knife industry as done by Busse, doesn't that make more sense.

In any case, I see your point, but I hope you see mine. These two steels are similar but the differences make them different steels with different mechanical properties. Simple fact.:)
 
Very interesting info here, but Satrang took this completely away from Cobalt's original question. Way to hijack a thread man.
 
Here's the card I hoped I wouldn't have to play. I contacted Bohler in the past and they stated they had and were supplying K329 as is to Busse. Now, that may have changed in the present, but there was a time when the two were the same. The steel may have changed but the name remains.
 
Satrang said:
Here's the card I hoped I wouldn't have to play. I contacted Bohler in the past and they stated they had and were supplying K329 as is to Busse. Now, that may have changed in the present, but there was a time when the two were the same. The steel may have changed but the name remains.

Who gives a damn if K329 is INFI? You don't think a company like Busse experiments with varying steels from time to time? I know for a fact that Jerry has made knives out of several steels looking for the one steel that will do it all for him, a search which probably does not end. So your "card" means little in the grand scheme. As thorough as Jerry covers his legal bases, if in fact the company you contacted did tell you that and it is INFI, I am sure they probably violated some sort of disclosure agreement. I am sure his attorney would love to know about it. Regardless, it still has nothing to do with the question Cobalt originally asked and again I say way to hijack a thread, dick.
 
Satrang,

Your comments are erroneous and irresponsible.

Your email is not listed and you have elected to not receive private messages so I will ask you publicly to contact me privately at jerry@bussecombat.com

Please include your real name and telephone number.

Thanks,

Jerry
 
If the horses mouth says I'm wrong. I'm wrong. The info I got from Bohler a few years back must have been false. I retract the Infi is K329 inference. They are similar but if Jerry says they are not the same or never were the same, you have to go with that fact.

As far as irresponsible, this is a forurm, open discussion, and you go with the information you get until absolute facts step in. Case closed, sorry for the confusion.
 
you go with the information you get until absolute facts step in

There's your facts, then there "absolute facts"? Rather then call Jerry you're retracting? Sorry, it YOU that is being irresponsible not us.

I suggest you don't use the words "facts" unless they are indeed "facts" and not just "opinion" or "conjecture".
 
SteelDriver (bold by Cobalt) said:
Perhaps it's worth taking a look at the differences between INFI and K329/Chipper in detail.

C, Cr, Mo, V
No discrepancies here. INFI (as tested) falls comfortably into the ranges for Chipper types.

Mn
K329 call for 0.48/0.55% manganese, while INFI does not list any. This doesn't mean that INFI has no Mn, since the sulfur and phosphorus levels of INFI are also unlisted but I'm sure it contains S and P as impurities. All modern steels contain Mn, so I would be very surprised if INFI truly has none.This may well be, but the content of INFI was determined by a chemical analysis, not someones impression, so how was that missed? That chemical analysis also missed the phosphorus, sulfur, carbon, and nitrogen. Jerry had to fill in the C and N content. Mn is needed at least to control problems with FeS during hot rolling or forging. If the S level is kept very low, the Mn could be minimized as well.

Si & Co

INFI seems to have cobalt replace the silicon in the Chipper grades. Mod-INFI then, is presumably even closer to Chipper. Maybe so, not sure what Mod INFI is not sure anyone really knows Mod INFI is INFI without Co, to reduce cost. This has been stated repeatedly in the past.

Ni

0.74% in INFI, and kept below 0.4% in K329.K329 has NONE according to the spec sheets, so where are you comming up with it? Reread post #16 by Satrang. Nickel: Kept below 0.40

N

INFI has 0.11% and Chipper doesn't say. Neither do the datasheets for S30V and 3V, though nobody doubts the nitrogen in CPM steels.Where is it in K329? We aren't talking CPM are we. Nitrogen has been added to steel long before the CPMs and is added to many steels today, though seldom stated. If INFI's analysis didn't show N, are you surprised that K329's didn't either?

So the only real differences are the cobalt/silicon and nickel. Both are small enough that any metallurgist would categorize INFI in the Chipper family. Splitting hairs? Maybe. But take a look at the spec for W-2 and you begin to realize how 'lenient' some of these families are.
Just a few more comments, but seeing how the thread has progressed I don't see much hope for discussing the effects of these differences to INFI's properties.
 
Satrang said:
... I'll be glad educate you

I generally ignore rumors from anon sources, and need actual published facts. If anyone is curious as to what Satrang's posts are based on, a few years back a knife maker discovered that Busse had bought steel from the same place they did and started spreading the *RUMOR* that INFI was the same steel. The issue was never discussed with Busse and others like Satrang felt it was perfectly responsible to come on the internet and present it as a fact, without ever once actually checking with Busse to get his side or even considering that the steel could be used for something else, does Busse just make INFI blades, have you ever asked them do they do outside contracting to make other things.

I have heard a lot of rumors about how knives are made, custom knifemakers who don't actually grind their blades, who have them made production style by other people, who do really low end heat treating but claim otherwise (don't do cryo, single tempers, air quench in large batches, etc.) , who use low grade steels but say it is a high grade tool steel, etc. . The list goes on. I don't in general pay any attention to *rumors* or other "facts" that people are only willing to say in private or by anon means and are unwilling to do any fact checking.

Mike Turber noted when he started Bladeforums it was not intended for rumor spreading and several times said he would not participate in such discussions, it is too bad more people don't follow the standard he lead. And yes I did discuss this with Busse long ago after sending him some pictures of the most recent insane thing Pat would do with his knives. He thought it was amusing, which is it, but noting it in public, presenting it as facts, claiming a professional background while doing so - it probably doesn't amuse him much anymore.

Satrang said:
Here's the card I hoped I wouldn't have to play. I contacted Bohler in the past and they stated they had and were supplying K329 as is to Busse. Now, that may have changed in the present, but there was a time when the two were the same. The steel may have changed but the name remains.

Busse has used many steels, some in very large volumes. They bought a *huge* amount of 5160 a few years back, it ended up in blanks for Ranger Knives. They bought a massive amount of D2, it ended up in blades for Swamp Rat. They also did a huge steel comparison years back when they ran test blades in different steels. Busse also didn't always use INFI, some early prototypes were D2, they used A2 for a *long* time. None of this in any way links INFI to those steels - which would be obvious if you ever *used* the knives.

Steeldriver and Cobalt, it is *very* difficult to judge from the composition of a steel the performance except in a general sense. You can say for example generally that cobalt helps in hot hardness and cutting of abrasive materials (see Allen's book for example) but trying to say something like 3% of vanadium gives X% of wear resistance is impossible. If you check the tool steel reference books, often you can find equations for alloys which can be used to *roughly* gauge such effects but that is all they are, they don't replace the materials data, which is what you should use. Look at O1 and A2, these appear to be similar steels, go just by the composition and guess how they compare in strength, toughness and ductility, now look up how they actually behave which is *really* different.

Even very small differences can make *large* effects, vanadium in small amounts for example can prevent grain growth (the carbides are very stable to really high soak temps, 2250F and thus they pin the ausentite grain) and thus they can be a massive help to a maker by preventing oversoaking. The issue gets even more complicated because you have to consider not only what elements do alone, but with each other, the amount of Carbon and Cr in stainless for example has to be a very specific ratio to get the required high hardness for edge retention, the amount of free Cr for corrosion resistance, and all while getting very fine Cr carbides (the K2 type) to prevent edge degredation from tear out. This is achieved in AEB-L for example but not in other steels which are very similar.

-Cliff
 
Back
Top