I've been called to jury duty twice, but never had to serve. Once, when I was very young, I was excused during the picking process and the second time, the defendant didn't show up for trial. Great decision on his part, huh?
I read your description of the trial, Danelle. It was fascinating. It's hard to believe that anyone could be cold hearted enough to ruin someone's life and put them in prison for many years, all without any compassion, I suppose. The young man you mention as the accused still has many problems, even though he's been found not guilty. His reputation is surely soiled, if not ruined, as his family will never trust him again, at least not the same way as before. Think of all the hard feelings and how many people still ask themselves if he really did it. Some people who never go to the trouble of finding out all the facts might think you jurors made a mistake. Also, this guy lost his home because of this accusation. I hope he has some legal recourse to obtain just compensation for his loss.
It's unbelievable that someone's life could be trashed just so a young idiot can be "made" into a gang. But, looking at the news of the recent past, think of what has happened to those Lacrosse players at Duke University. Because of one promiscuous and drunken prostitute and the political ambitions of a morally comprimised prosecutor, their lives were held in limbo for at least a year and it has cost their families a small fortune in defence fees to fight the accusations. I guess this could be considered another form of violence.