The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is ready to order! See this thread for details:
https://www.bladeforums.com/threads/bladeforums-2024-traditional-knife.2003187/
Price is $300 $250 ea (shipped within CONUS). If you live outside the US, I will contact you after your order for extra shipping charges.
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/ - Order as many as you like, we have plenty.
I don't really feel that anyone can argue against calling the 112's sheath a sheath. Ths whole discussion started over the term "sheath knife" which has a long history of being descriptive of a fixed blade knife. I don't think that is arguable.
I'd wager a cold frosty beer that the split is 50/50 at best for the 112. No way to back that up, obviously.
BG42,
Can you find single dictionary or encyclopedia that defines the term "sheath knife" in any way other than being a fixed blade knife? Every one I've looked at defines the term to be a fixed blade.
FWIW, I have and use the Buck 110, Buck 112, Buck 112 Ecolite and Buck 500. The sheaths/holsters sit unused in my drawer. These knives all get used regularly and never ever get belt carried. The 110 rides in jacket pocket or pack. The others all get pocket carried (all apart of my EDC rotation). I'll concede that many 110 users belt carry them, but I'd wager a cold frosty beer that the split is 50/50 at best for the 112. No way to back that up, obviously. But that's my sense in talking with other users.
That's a good question. We could take a quick poll. I belt carry my 112. It's just too much knife for my pants pocket.
First of all, the fact that a 112 is a sheath knife would not be changed if everybody pocket-carried it. A fact is a fact.
So your proposition is irrelevant.
Second, (I already corrected Plumberdv on this, but apparently you missed that) NOBODY here has said that a fixed-blade knife is not a sheath knife, so nobody is bothered by your definitions. You are fighting a straw man on that one. All the rest of us can do is watch and smile as you tussle with your invisible and apparently imaginary opponent. Good luck getting him to buy you that cold beer.
The actual point in question is whether or not a 112 is a sheath knife and we all know it comes with a sheath.
What you are sadly lacking in your position is a definition that states that the 112 is something OTHER than a sheath knife.
You can't find that because.........drum roll.........a 112 is a sheath knife. All available evidence proves it.
See how that works?
![]()
Could you post a picture of it? What are you guys talking about calling a 112 a sheathed knife? DM
Put me down as a "no way" in your poll (pocket carry a 112?). I wouldn't even consider carrying a 112, 500 and especially a 110 in a pocket. If they were designed and intended as a pocket knife, Buck woukdn't go to the extra expense of furnishing them with a belt sheath.
What DM said, was this:
And he STILL hasn't been provided with a picture of this amazing knife.
But he did liven things up for a while.
![]()
F
Second, (I already corrected Plumberdv on this, but apparently you missed that) NOBODY here has said that a fixed-blade knife is not a sheath knife, so nobody is bothered by your definitions. You are fighting a straw man on that one. All the rest of us can do is watch and smile as you tussle with your invisible and apparently imaginary opponent. Good luck getting him to buy you that cold beer.
See how that works?