- Joined
- Jun 20, 2009
- Messages
- 13,240
Definately go with the BK-7 or USMC. Like I said, whichever you like better, get because they're both great knives and it would take a lot of abuse to break them.
The BladeForums.com 2024 Traditional Knife is available! Price is $250 ea (shipped within CONUS).
Order here: https://www.bladeforums.com/help/2024-traditional/
A picture is worth of a thousand words. I do like Becker BK 7 tad more than I do from Ka-Bar as in camping / surviving utility. Both are very fine as I have said before but in terms of usability and ergonomics BK 7 is better.
![]()
Here are a few I considered, top down; KaBar, Gerber LMFII, RAT RC-5, and Buck 650 Nighthawk.
![]()
The RC-5 is a great choice - .25" thick 1095 - but twice the other's cost. I'd tie the Nighthawk with the KaBar at second, with the Gerber at a distant third place. That last place is primarily due to the serrated blade - I like plain blades, as I have saws for sawing. The blade's 'mystery metal' is also a rationale. It's a keeper, however, as it was a gift from my son. As to the Nighthawk vs KaBar, I guess I'd guide my choice by the environment - wetter = Nighthawk (SS 420HC blade), dryer = KaBar. In all honesty, I used a KaBar for my camp knife for years and was completely satisfied - in fact, I often thought it was 'overkill'.
I love my early Buck 347 Vantage Pro - great pocket knife - but I'd consider a SAK or Multi-tool as a 'bug out bag' knife first. The 'tools' might be very welcome in an emergency.
Stainz
I need to consider weight also and I think the Kabar USMC is about 6 ounces lighter than the BK7
I believe the Kabar Next generation has a 440A blade steel. From what I understand from gathering information from this forum is that 1095
would be a better blade choice over 440A but please correct me if I'm wrong.