Chuck Bybee said:
Blade Shapes:
Blackout = Drop Point
Blur = Multiple Shapes
Boa = Recurve Bolo
Bump = Onion Recurve
Chive = Spear Point
Leek = Spear Point
Mini Task = Warncliff
Offset = Onion Recurve
Random Task = Reverse Tanto
Ricochet = Drop Point
Scallion = Spear Point
Storm = Upswept
Vapor = Drop Point
Whirlwind = Clip Point
Whisper = Onion Recurve
Are you sure the Onion Kerhaw blade shapes look the same?
yeah, they do. putting 1/16" of a belly on a warncliff or sheepsfoot blade doesnt make it a spear point, or a drop point, etc. essentially nearly
all kershaw blade shapes
look very similar, save a few exceptions like the boa. want to see a variety in blade shapes? check out spyderco, SOG or CRKT. most kershaws look the same to me... in fact there is little differentiation in their entire product line - i can pick out other knife companies knives from a lineup based on their design but if you showed me a dozen kershaws id be stumped.
and im not trying to convince
you - the question the OP asked was why kershaw gets so little attention and i am answering with an opinion of why
i am not buying them. everyone is entitled to think what they wish and buy whatever they like - me, i dont like the onion style blades and i will pass until they have more variety. im sure they wont go out of business just because i dont buy their knives - but i am not the only person who has said something along these lines: so perhaps they should consider that by mainly marketing one style of knife they are shutting out a lot of potential customers. other knife companies have a variety - so while there are some spydercos, CRKTs, SOGs, Benchmades, etc that i
loathe there are many others that i absolutely love. variety is the key.
that said, i have absolutely no biases against any knife manufacturer (well, except perhaps gerber - i cant abide them ripping off other knifemaker's designs). if a knife looks good, is well-made of decent materials and is priced fairly it is definitely getting my interest, no matter what company makes it or what country they make it in.
Chuck Bybee said:
The lame stuff is called mokume. It is similar to damascus. It is hard to make and significantly upgrades a knife. Is damascus a gimmick?
honestly? yeah, sometimes. these days damascus can be a
huge gimmick. well made damascus is a beauty to behold... unfortunately a large portion of it isnt well made, but is simply featured in a knife to jack up the price. just because a knife is made of damascus doesnt make it a good knife, nor does it make it a particularly well designed one. exotic materials alone do not make a good knife.
Chuck Bybee said:
The blade is made with san-mai blade of VG-10 stainless-steel center core with 420J2 on the outside. The blade is very expensive to make.
the key point there being
very expensive to make. when i see evidence that there is a significant performance benefit to counterbalance the waste of time and vast extra cost involved then perhaps ill become a believer too, but until then for my purposes i would rather just have the blade out of plain VG-10, save a bunch of money, and be done with it. san-mai is near obsolete in this day and age when super-steels are readily available for the entire blade. yes, most of the time its a gimmick.
and honestly, the bolsters could be made out of 24 carat gold for all i care - i just dont like the knife,
period. i think it looks tacky, while there are many other knives available in its price range of comparable materials that have class. and keep in mind that i wasnt a spyderco fan until just a couple of weeks ago.
cheers,
-gabriel
**edited for grammar