Vec I gotta disagree on this one.
My M-43 kukri weighs 27 ounces sans sheath.
I have carried it over extended distances in very rugged terrain and conditions, and had to then press it into use to build shelters, chop wood etc. It is not only a rested soldiers tool. While some kukri's may qualify as such (a few of the larger Ang Kholas etc.) most do not.
The M-43's edge is thinner than some other kukri's. It has addedd drop to the blade and the handle which increases its chopping performance as well as it's tip speed. This results in exceptional cutting performance. Equals less work for me. It also greatly improves the blades handling characteristics providing an exceptionaly live and agile blade in use (including combative use). It is in its own breed unlike any other kuk I've used.
I have seen mine outperform axes in experienced hands. And when I've compared it to a hawk the hawk didn't even come close.
I love em both Hawk and Kuk. But the M-43 wins out and is my choice in the woods most the time.
My M-43 kukri weighs 27 ounces sans sheath.
I have carried it over extended distances in very rugged terrain and conditions, and had to then press it into use to build shelters, chop wood etc. It is not only a rested soldiers tool. While some kukri's may qualify as such (a few of the larger Ang Kholas etc.) most do not.
The M-43's edge is thinner than some other kukri's. It has addedd drop to the blade and the handle which increases its chopping performance as well as it's tip speed. This results in exceptional cutting performance. Equals less work for me. It also greatly improves the blades handling characteristics providing an exceptionaly live and agile blade in use (including combative use). It is in its own breed unlike any other kuk I've used.
I have seen mine outperform axes in experienced hands. And when I've compared it to a hawk the hawk didn't even come close.
I love em both Hawk and Kuk. But the M-43 wins out and is my choice in the woods most the time.