file test or not....I have taken several kukris to a rockwell tester to determine hardness.
It is actually quite difficult to do, because the spot has to be perfectly parallel to get a good reading.
Anyway...suffice it to say that the in 2 places I was able to successfully test, I got readings of 58 HRC on a properly calibrated machine.
Something interesting:
The quench method used by the kamis is quite unique (especially by our standards).
I have "tinkered" with such a quench when making my Ulu blades...and have indeed produced a visible quench line (no etch needed). Here's a pic:
No clay was used...just an edge quench into water...over a forged finish. What you are looking at is not a tradition hamon. However, it IS a differential quench line (separate hardness zones).
Because 5160 is a *medium* carbon steel, the "shock" to the steel is not enough to damage it with a water quench.
Most knifemakers use oil...very few use water...I don't really ever use water...yes, it's kinda risky.
But I've only been making knives for a few years....a bonified kami has got at least 20-30 years under his belt and probably thousands of knives have passed through his hands.
It really is an amazing craft. It CAN be duplicated here...but why? The beauty of the kukri is the craft as much as the knife itself.
mete = got any opinion on the water-quench method used by the kamis?