Craig, I received your khukuri a few days ago, I thought I sent you an email, sorry. Anyway, you can see some comments on it at:
http://www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/001759.html
You can check out my initial impressions at:
http://www.physics.mun.ca:80/~sstamp/knives/bas_gh.html
And finally you can see the details of the upcoming test at:
http://www.physics.mun.ca:80/~sstamp/knives/face_off.html
Results will be coming in fairly regular and the pages will be updated every few days as I compile the information.
The initial performance is very promising. It chops very well, no chipping has been seen (just wood so far) and just a little impaction which is reducing with each sharpening.
I have just finished running it against the TUSK with regards to chopping over a wide variety of tasks on wood. Cutting down trees, limbing them out, pointing them into stakes (gently), and finally sectioning them into 1' lengths. This was repeated on dry seasoned wood.
In short, while the TUSK has the far more comfortable handle (its longer and fatter and is better shaped for comfort and security), the Service #1 model generally far outperforms it in terms of ease and speed of chopping. Because of the flat grind on the TUSK it sinks too easily into the wood and gets stuck, this really limits the force that you can use while chopping. As well the balance of the khukuri is more suited to heavy chopping as you can use a tight grip and really power the knife into the wood.
Cobalt made some really nice posts about exactly this feature of the khukuri geometry in the HI forum on Bladeforums.com.
Anyway, once I evaluate the Uluchet and Ang Khola as well I post up the details of the entire run.
-Cliff