Tom, I've been quiet on this for about a day because I'm confused. Seems we started out talking of a khyber knife. T spine, thin deep blade cross section. Fairly light, good for stabbing and slashing. Big but still fast blade, for fighting.
Then as I kind of expected, Bill puts in the opinion the kamis wouldn't want to make a blade that thin. OK, I can appreciate that. Not only because of culture, but because if I understand correctly, they are used to making tools, for neighbors, that are used daily, which must be very expensive to a fellow Nepali. And upon which your neighbor's livelihood and at times life depends. Would you make something for someone you know and care for that might cost him his life if it breaks? And if it costs him his life, what happens to his family?
It seems fair to me not to ask someone to make something outside his experience and expertise. The kamis know by generations of tradition what they can do and what to expect it to do. So if they make us a knife, they're going to make it hell for strong. I'm fine with that too. But it won't be a khyber. Again correct me if I'm missing something.
So what we'll get won't be a khyber. Here's where I get confused - what are we asking them to make? Is it:
1) a fighting knife?
2) a Resin/Searles/Vidalia sandbar bowie?
3) a camp knife?
4) the world's strongest straight bladed knife as Cobalt suggests?
We need to decide first what the thing is. Then we can decide what we want it to do. Once we do that, we can decide how we want to do it. Are we going for something that does one thing better than any other knife? Are we going for something that can do anything but nothing well? Or something that does a few things pretty good?
I'm afraid that if this is answered, we'll find that everyone wants something different, and by the time we reach a compromise, it won't be what anyone really wants. Hey, I could go for any of the 4 types ( fighter, bowie, camp, world's strongest, etc. ).
But first, let's make up our minds.
------------------
Russ S