I know the proper answer is 1084 first, O1 second. (for the most part)
I'm reading that a lot of Chef Knives seem to be .09" or .07" in thickness. Getting 1084 or O1 that thin seems to unavailable from Aldo (as of 5/6/16) . O1 gets close at .110", so I'll fall back to that if necessary.
However, 1095 is available in .07", .09", and its very affordable.
If I go with 1095, and do a campfire heat treat on it (heat to non-metallic and quench), can I expect it to be better or worse than a 1084 steel with the same heat treat?
I'm intrigued by the 1095 as it provides me a chance to play with hamon's, but if not being able to soak it at temp for heat treat will create a less than desirable knife...thoughts?
Trying to keep the costs down, so I don't want to send em out for heat treat.
Thanks!
-Rob
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm reading that a lot of Chef Knives seem to be .09" or .07" in thickness. Getting 1084 or O1 that thin seems to unavailable from Aldo (as of 5/6/16) . O1 gets close at .110", so I'll fall back to that if necessary.
However, 1095 is available in .07", .09", and its very affordable.
If I go with 1095, and do a campfire heat treat on it (heat to non-metallic and quench), can I expect it to be better or worse than a 1084 steel with the same heat treat?
I'm intrigued by the 1095 as it provides me a chance to play with hamon's, but if not being able to soak it at temp for heat treat will create a less than desirable knife...thoughts?
Trying to keep the costs down, so I don't want to send em out for heat treat.
Thanks!
-Rob
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk