I didn't use to sell much, but ran out of room....forget about displaying, I don't have much room left for storing.
Keep accumulating you Pure Collectors.....let us know what you do if you run out of room for your collection.
Knives are small. I am thinking I would need way more than 1000 before I ran out of room. Then time to buy a bigger house.
Go to a gun show sometime, Ken....maybe the Tulsa Wanenmacher's show....it'll change and possibly blow your mind, if you agree with what Don says on the subject.
I go to quite a few local gun shows. Maybe (probably) shows like the Nations Gun Show are not the kind of gun show you mean, or maybe the gun market here is different than Tulsa. What sells around here are functional guns rather than collectibles such as flintlocks, engraved wonders, and 1st generation Colt SAAs. I see the same old dudes at show after show with their tables full of high priced history pieces . . . I see a lot of the same old guns show after show and I have never actually witnessed a sale of any of that stuff. But every show I personally see dozens of brand new factory guns sold (and every so often I buy one myself). I am on the mailing list for some antigue gun auctions like Rock Island, but I don't collect guns (I own "functional" guns), so I don't keep up on that market.
I am active in other collectible markets - coins, paper money, and Americana for example. What it seems to me has happened in those markets is what Don Guild suggests is the case in the collectible knife market. A flight to quality. The choicest, rarest and higest end paper notes, coins, and Americana are in as strong demand as I can recall and the prices continue to escalate through the economic depression as the buyers of these items are folks with very very large disposable incomes and those foiks have been affected comparatively less by the economic depression. In contrast, more common and lower priced pieces . . . have lost value and there appear to be fewer buyers with disposable money for those items.
I am not sure what particular lessons I am supposed to draw from gun shows about the knife collecting market that would contradict what Don Guild said. Maybe the gun market is different than these other collectible markets and closer to the collectible knife market and maybe indeed, it is not the high end of the gun market that is hot, but rather the lower end of the collectible market and that turns out to be teh same thing for knives. I don't know about that, but welcome any insight that you or others are willing to share about that.
I am the first to admit that my perspective is limited. But what I see from that limited perspective are a lot of lower priced and more commonplace knives on purveyor sites for what seems like forever, and I see a lot of lower priced knives being offered by makers here and elsewhere . . . that do not
appear to move, or if they do, it is slow. I also see a few super-rare pieces pop up and disappear as soon as they show up. I cannot remember the last time I saw anyone offering to sell a Steinau knife. It seems to me that few Loerchners or Walkers are offered and the prices on those have seemingly gone through the roof. Quality Steigerwalt knives . . . hard for me to find, especially at prices that are not significantly more than just a few years ago. Maybe easier for you. I certainly do not see prices on desirable Moran, Loveless and Warenski knives declining. Do you think the values of Jim Schmidt's knives are declining?
As always, I would love to improve the quality of my perspective based on factual observations from those with better views.
And some may argue there's no pure, un-pure, good or bad way to collect, only the method that brings the individual collector the most enjoyment and/or satisfaction.
It was a linguistic comment - "pure" linguistically.
I do not see a definitional meaning for "collect" that involves "purvey," "speculate," "invest," or "flip." It seems that when one's activities mix in those elements together with "gathering"/"accumulating" then one creates an admixture of "collect" in a similar way that one adding copper and/or silver to .999 fine gold creates 14K gold. 14K gold is certainly less pure than 0.999 fine gold. Of course that does not mean that 14K gold is "good" or "bad" (to use your words). It is just less pure gold than .999 fine gold.
But I guess folks are free to use words any way they want, right?