- Joined
- Jul 28, 2003
- Messages
- 747
The secret to AEB-L is to have the hardness at around 62-63 RC. At this hardness it will hold an edge very, very well and is still pretty tough. Very easy to resharpen too, think high carbon.
AEB-L sometimes gets a bad rap for edge holding but usually its being run too soft. All my leather knives are at 63 RC and my everyday knives and kitchen knives are at 62RC.
I can see that you are going out of your way not to step on LT's toes, and this speaks well of you. However, you have hit upon my primary reason for hesitation with regard to buying a Genesis in AEB-L - he runs 'em at 57-59 Rockwell C scale. Everything that I've read says that AEB-L is optimized exactly where you do it - around 62. I've owned two FFG and one scandi Genesis in A2 and they were all three very mediocre with regards to edge retention (no comparison to BR's A2). I've had Buck's Bose cryo'd 420HC hold an edge as well, perhaps slightly better.
That's not to bad mouth LT - I like his work. And, I understand why he does it the way he does - "bushcrafters" like to beat the holy hell out of their knives, and if he ran it harder he'd be replacing knives left and right for folks who like to chop bricks and rocks. As you know (probably much better than I) heat treat can be (and really needs to be) optimized for a blade's intended use. Since his customers like to beat on their knives, he's optimized his heat treat for toughness. I get that.
My other hesitation is that he likes to grind his convex kinda thick near the edge and then add a secondary bevel to make it cut - again, to make it more durable. However, I want a knife to cut.....I rarely beat on my knives. So, I'm looking for a knife that takes a wicked edge and holds it a reasonable period of time, and easily resharpens back to that screamin' edge. I'm still trying to determine if the convex Genesis is the right knife for me.
USPS says that my convex 3V Next Gen will be here tomorrow. Maybe that will help me sort this all out.