Hi all. I recently decided to try a few kit knives from 2 independent knife supply houses. I bought a delta 5 and an SG-4 from knife kits dot com and a sparing bowie from usa knifemaker. The sparing bowie hasn't arrived yet.
One of the trends I'm seeing in the kit knives I've looked at is blade thickness. IF it's posted at all, it is usually TOO THIN. The SG-4 is 3/16" thick, this is a good thickness for any fixed blade in the 4-7 inch range. I think it will work out well.
The Delta 5 I got is a joke. It has a nice scar on the handguard thats deep enough so I can't file it out. It's not really worth sending it back as the cost of the kit plus shipping (to me) plus re-shipping (to them) adds to a kit thats already TOO expensive for what it is. Nobody will give me $150-$200 for a knife/sheath/sharpener package thats worth $40.00,especially if the knife has a nice divitt between the blade guard and bolster.
I have seen COUNTLESS fixed blades with 8-10 inch blades that are between 5/32- 3/16 thick. This is way too thin.
People, especially Americans, want thick, beefy blades. A quick look at Cold Steel Knives will verify this. Cold Steel over builds Their stuff and charges accordingly. Other than that, Cold Steel isn't giving you anything special. Some of their stuff breaks too, but they still do VERY well financially.
If these knife supply houses offered me a blade of 8-10 inches, with a 4.5" tang, 1/4"-5/16" thick, 440C or 5160, hardened/tempered/cryo-tempered for $100.00 I would buy that. It would become a $250.00 knife that one could beat the snot out of and it would not fail. The supplier is making a little money, I'm making a little money, and the end user is getting a hell of a knife. EVERYBODY wins.
I do understand that many knives circa 1860 have blades that are between 3-4mm thick, but this is 2013 not 1860. There are NOT thousands and thousands of blades around from 1860 either...maybe due to the blades being too thin and breaking? Humans always TRY to use a tool in a proper way, but eventually said tool will be "abused". It will be used as a prybar, a ladder, a shooting rest, shovel/paddle, pot holder, hammer, etc. etc.
I'm glad places like knifekitsdotcom exist. I'm glad they sell kit knives. I'm not going to slam them for the crappy delta 5 I got because lemons DO happen. However I would love to see the knife supply houses have a "line" of knives that are 2-3 times the cost of their current offerings, but have a much more defined pedigree.
Said pedigree should include: usA steel blanks, shaped in usA, heat treated/tempered/cryo tempered in usA, 440c, 5160 (from usA). Blade length/style can be whatever, BUT, thickness as follows: 3-7 inch length is 3/16"; 7.1-9" is 1/4"; and 9.1-14 is 5/16". Thank you all for taking the time to read my rant post. Comment/reply if you like.
To see the knives I've made check out my youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oni0CVffpJw
One of the trends I'm seeing in the kit knives I've looked at is blade thickness. IF it's posted at all, it is usually TOO THIN. The SG-4 is 3/16" thick, this is a good thickness for any fixed blade in the 4-7 inch range. I think it will work out well.
The Delta 5 I got is a joke. It has a nice scar on the handguard thats deep enough so I can't file it out. It's not really worth sending it back as the cost of the kit plus shipping (to me) plus re-shipping (to them) adds to a kit thats already TOO expensive for what it is. Nobody will give me $150-$200 for a knife/sheath/sharpener package thats worth $40.00,especially if the knife has a nice divitt between the blade guard and bolster.
I have seen COUNTLESS fixed blades with 8-10 inch blades that are between 5/32- 3/16 thick. This is way too thin.
People, especially Americans, want thick, beefy blades. A quick look at Cold Steel Knives will verify this. Cold Steel over builds Their stuff and charges accordingly. Other than that, Cold Steel isn't giving you anything special. Some of their stuff breaks too, but they still do VERY well financially.
If these knife supply houses offered me a blade of 8-10 inches, with a 4.5" tang, 1/4"-5/16" thick, 440C or 5160, hardened/tempered/cryo-tempered for $100.00 I would buy that. It would become a $250.00 knife that one could beat the snot out of and it would not fail. The supplier is making a little money, I'm making a little money, and the end user is getting a hell of a knife. EVERYBODY wins.
I do understand that many knives circa 1860 have blades that are between 3-4mm thick, but this is 2013 not 1860. There are NOT thousands and thousands of blades around from 1860 either...maybe due to the blades being too thin and breaking? Humans always TRY to use a tool in a proper way, but eventually said tool will be "abused". It will be used as a prybar, a ladder, a shooting rest, shovel/paddle, pot holder, hammer, etc. etc.
I'm glad places like knifekitsdotcom exist. I'm glad they sell kit knives. I'm not going to slam them for the crappy delta 5 I got because lemons DO happen. However I would love to see the knife supply houses have a "line" of knives that are 2-3 times the cost of their current offerings, but have a much more defined pedigree.
Said pedigree should include: usA steel blanks, shaped in usA, heat treated/tempered/cryo tempered in usA, 440c, 5160 (from usA). Blade length/style can be whatever, BUT, thickness as follows: 3-7 inch length is 3/16"; 7.1-9" is 1/4"; and 9.1-14 is 5/16". Thank you all for taking the time to read my rant post. Comment/reply if you like.
To see the knives I've made check out my youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oni0CVffpJw