Im just curious why Lansky clamp-n-rod system should work worse on recurved or serrated edges than SPYDERCO SharpMaker? Please search
their site and you will find triangle hone for serrated blades, even in two (medium and fine) grits. Also the performance on recurved blades depends mostly on the hone wideness and Lansky hones are not wider than SharpMaker rods. The hones on my GATCO EdgeMate sharpening system (basically very similar to Lansky one) are 1,5 times wider but I didnt have any problems reprofiling and resharpening recurved blades (BM Pinnacle, KATZ KNIVES Special Forces and more).
So probably we deal mostly with the question
like or
do not like.
To say Lansky will not work on serrated blades or something like this excuse me but this is good deal of exaggeration
Yes, I do like SharpMaker more and use it more frequently (in fact the most frequently I sharpen freehand

but this is just thanks to my laziness and SharpMaker ease to set up.
If someone is looking for the
real difference:
- SharpMakers advantage is clearly visible working on the blades longer than 4 inches.
- Its disadvantage is the possibility to blunt your blades tip if you will allow it to break from the rod in natural way at the end of each stroke.
- Even with diamond and ultra-fine rods added (SharpMaker) Lansky still has more hones to choose. Quite another question is how much of them you really need...
As to diamond rods...
Quite naturally it is everyones private matter how to evaluate the value between their money and time. But lets compare comparable things only, please. You are spending your bucks
once for diamond rods but you are wasting your time
each time using medium rods for the tasks they are not intended for. BTW, do you think they do not wear out, especially at the angles, when reprofiling edges?
Ooppsss, Spark, when will you found us the contest for the longest post? Im so willing to win at least once...
