- Joined
- Apr 16, 2002
- Messages
- 175
V10011011:
Yeah, the EdgePros appear pricey at first glance. Still, there's a lot of value and utility in the product. I don't think any EdgePro owner would say they didn't get their moneys worth. And, in spite of what some other posters said, there's little similarity between the EdgePro and Lansky systems. Each uses an angle guide - - but the commonality ends there.
The Lansky has too short a honing radius and over time will make a mess out of a blade longer than about 1.75 inches. For now, you may as well go with a Norton 8" combo stone (coarse on one side, fine-india on the other). This is an economical solution given your current (albeit, temporary) budget constraints.
Just hate to see you mess up your nice blade Bro'. Definitely stay away from the Lansky if you really value your blade.
After you get that College Parchment, and are gainfully employed, then graduate to an EdgePro. Once you've had EdgePro, you'll never go back!
Cheers,
TT2Toes
Yeah, the EdgePros appear pricey at first glance. Still, there's a lot of value and utility in the product. I don't think any EdgePro owner would say they didn't get their moneys worth. And, in spite of what some other posters said, there's little similarity between the EdgePro and Lansky systems. Each uses an angle guide - - but the commonality ends there.
The Lansky has too short a honing radius and over time will make a mess out of a blade longer than about 1.75 inches. For now, you may as well go with a Norton 8" combo stone (coarse on one side, fine-india on the other). This is an economical solution given your current (albeit, temporary) budget constraints.
Just hate to see you mess up your nice blade Bro'. Definitely stay away from the Lansky if you really value your blade.
After you get that College Parchment, and are gainfully employed, then graduate to an EdgePro. Once you've had EdgePro, you'll never go back!
Cheers,
TT2Toes