- Joined
- May 29, 2011
- Messages
- 668
I think they are different knives for different purposes.
I think both offer high quality.
CRK = classy, do everything short of using as a prybar, knife.
Strider = overbuilt "tactical" look/feel knife that you can use as a prybar.
Figure out your true EDC needs and pick the one that meet those needs.
Striders just don't do it for me. They do feel good in the hand, but not in the pocket, they take up too much room. I also see no need for such an overbuilt knife, especially in a folder. I used to be into big tactical looking folders, we all go though that phase at least once, if not more. And if that is your bag, maybe a Strider is for you. To each their own.
I like high quality user that masks it's toughness in elegance. Hence I prefer the CRK knives.
Best of luck.
That is verbatim, how I feel about it as well. Well written Hawk.
I'll also agree with another previous poster, they really are two totally different knives that are only compared because of price. The XM series is more comparable to Striders than CRK are, but even they aren't that similar. To be honest, I think thats the beauty in it, as CRK, Strider, and Hinderer are all different enough so that someone can find exactly what they want when shopping the big three.
And when making the same decision, I went with a Sebenza 25.