- Joined
- Jun 23, 1999
- Messages
- 1,209
I'm now the lucky and honored owner of 2 CRK Sebenzas, large and small. he first I've had for two or three years, the latter just arrived a week ago. Both are plain.
They are intended to be real working knives. The large has been heavily used. Its lost about a mm of its tip, and has been sharpened dozen's of times by hand and with various angle-handling systems. In my opinion, the
plain Sebenza, if not the most beautiful knife in its price range (not counting the aesthetics of its engineering), is most surely one of if not *the* strongest, and most elegant from the viewpoint of ngineering
simplicity coupled with the best in materials and engineering practices of today. I've met people who thought the Seb. is too highly
priced, but never one who didn't think it was a great knife!
That being said, the small is identical to the large. Yes, a genuine miniature, .84 the size of the large (L and H. I measured .81 for the width)! This doesn't sound like much of a reduction (roughly 16%), but objectively, it feels smaller than that. The weight ratio of the small to the large is only .57, a whopping 43% reduction. That probably goes a long way to explaining the subjective difference. Needless to say it is a strong and elegant (engineering again) knife. It is much better suited to carry when wearing lighter clothes, for example as might
be worn in office environments.
So is it worth $305 (retail). Ironically, even the price difference (the small is .88 of the large, 12% difference), is close enough to the L/H/W ratios above, especially when you consider that the amount of labor and energy (heat treatment for example) that goes into fabricating the small knife has to be about identical to that of a large! By this measure, the small is a very reasonable deal to be sure. Subjectively speaking, one might wonder. Is there any point to building
such a small knife this strong? Will its likely deployment ever take advantage of its strength? As light as it is, would not even lighter knives serve better in its expected (city clothes) deployment environment?
From this viewpoint, I think the large has to provide more bang for the buck! Never-the-less, now that I have it, I can say the following for the small...
1. It does make a better pairing knife (at least in my hand). It might be better for skinning very small game (like quail maybe) or caping a bird.
2. I'll carry it more than the large because I'm in city clothes more hours out of the day and days of the week now than I used to be...
3. "City people" are much less likely to react in their characteristic manner when you deploy it for utility purposes.
4. If I did ever get stranded in my city clothes, I'd sooner have this knife in my waistband than any of the other "city knives" I carry. A correlary to #4 is...
5. To (and in) the city, I will undoubtedly carry this knife much more than all of my other "city knives" combined.
If asked to recommend the small vs. the large, my opinion would hinge on the wearer's intended environment. If it is an environment in which a smaller (really medium sized with a blade of 2.75 inches) knife is more appropriate is going to be where you want to use it, then by all means, get the small. If not, if the environment is *any* other place,
get the large.
They are intended to be real working knives. The large has been heavily used. Its lost about a mm of its tip, and has been sharpened dozen's of times by hand and with various angle-handling systems. In my opinion, the
plain Sebenza, if not the most beautiful knife in its price range (not counting the aesthetics of its engineering), is most surely one of if not *the* strongest, and most elegant from the viewpoint of ngineering
simplicity coupled with the best in materials and engineering practices of today. I've met people who thought the Seb. is too highly
priced, but never one who didn't think it was a great knife!
That being said, the small is identical to the large. Yes, a genuine miniature, .84 the size of the large (L and H. I measured .81 for the width)! This doesn't sound like much of a reduction (roughly 16%), but objectively, it feels smaller than that. The weight ratio of the small to the large is only .57, a whopping 43% reduction. That probably goes a long way to explaining the subjective difference. Needless to say it is a strong and elegant (engineering again) knife. It is much better suited to carry when wearing lighter clothes, for example as might
be worn in office environments.
So is it worth $305 (retail). Ironically, even the price difference (the small is .88 of the large, 12% difference), is close enough to the L/H/W ratios above, especially when you consider that the amount of labor and energy (heat treatment for example) that goes into fabricating the small knife has to be about identical to that of a large! By this measure, the small is a very reasonable deal to be sure. Subjectively speaking, one might wonder. Is there any point to building
such a small knife this strong? Will its likely deployment ever take advantage of its strength? As light as it is, would not even lighter knives serve better in its expected (city clothes) deployment environment?
From this viewpoint, I think the large has to provide more bang for the buck! Never-the-less, now that I have it, I can say the following for the small...
1. It does make a better pairing knife (at least in my hand). It might be better for skinning very small game (like quail maybe) or caping a bird.
2. I'll carry it more than the large because I'm in city clothes more hours out of the day and days of the week now than I used to be...
3. "City people" are much less likely to react in their characteristic manner when you deploy it for utility purposes.
4. If I did ever get stranded in my city clothes, I'd sooner have this knife in my waistband than any of the other "city knives" I carry. A correlary to #4 is...
5. To (and in) the city, I will undoubtedly carry this knife much more than all of my other "city knives" combined.
If asked to recommend the small vs. the large, my opinion would hinge on the wearer's intended environment. If it is an environment in which a smaller (really medium sized with a blade of 2.75 inches) knife is more appropriate is going to be where you want to use it, then by all means, get the small. If not, if the environment is *any* other place,
get the large.