Les Stroud Temagami Knife

Before I really got into knives about 2 years ago, my choice of blade was a now discontinued Helle knife. Red birch handles, leather sheath. I used it through my time in the army and on various adventures. During my year in the army and the 6 months after, I was above the polar circle. The knife and sheath performed flawless and while I saw kydex sheaths crack and brittle at -40 degrees the leather hold up very well.

What worked for hundreds of years for the sami will work now.
 
I'm not a big fan of Scandi knives, but I've had Helles and was very impressed by the workmanship. I also like the handle design on this one.
 
What worked for hundreds of years for the sami will work now.

Indeed!

Alphabravo, have you ever tried leather sheath and wood handles? And, have you ever tried a full exposed tang in -30 celsius when your gloves are shredded in a survival situation? i dont think so..
 
Not to be the objector, but that is a really bad representation of a survival orientated knife...First off there is what looks to be a curly maple WOOD handle that is not scaled, but fully wrapped and pinned.. Secondly it comes with a leather sheath..2 qualities in a knife that fail in REAL survival situations..Wood easily cracks under hard use and leather both freezes and has the ability to become wet..Wet leather leads to your blade in a swimming pool..Over time leather will crack from the expansion and contraction from wet to dry...The last thing you want to worry about in survival is babying your tools..The blade is also a bit short..Couldnt pep fire wood easily or hack down limbs.. .Im almost surprised it doesnt have a sawback,bottle opener and glass compass in the sheath..Looks more like a light use trout knife over anything deemed to be labeled "survival".. Though Im not sure how much actual survival is done by the jesters on TV anyway..More about eating bugs, drinking urine and other shock value strategy for the couch survivalist...

LOL. Wood and leather? What were those idjits thinking? That stuff hasn't worked at all, ever.

What is "hard use" again?

Also, are you saying that if you can't hack and slash the vegetation with your knife like a squatter making an illegal farmstead in the Amazon basin, that the knife is incapable of making firewood or taking suitable branches off of a tree?

How these ancient knife cultures thrived without full tang slab handled supersteel machetes absolutely boggles the mind since they were obviously too stupid to invent micarta and kydex.
 
Indeed!

Alphabravo, have you ever tried leather sheath and wood handles? And, have you ever tried a full exposed tang in -30 celsius when your gloves are shredded in a survival situation? i dont think so..

Well I guess your a mind reader as well as a survival master since you know about what I have done without ever even speaking to me...And you really think I would make such an opinion without past experience on the subject???
Oh wait thats right...:rolleyes:


Yes I have tried leather and wood and I realize that for hundreds of years, materials that would today be considered simple and outdated sustained life and worked just fine..But while I love my historically accurate sinew and animal fat Mongolian Horsebow you will never catch me in a treestand with it..

But looking at things from a modern stand point we have come a long way since we used animal hides and whittled sections of wood..There are much better materials on the market today that surpass both leather and wood..If you have some sort of cling to old materials thats fine with me..I was just stating a fact that leather and wood are not the best materials for true survival...

Im sure a leather sheath can baton a blade or last for some time and a wrapped wood handle can chop...But when the situation calls worrying about materials and maintenance just dont add up...Not when you have better options..All of the major military units have moved up from the old Ka Bars, the webbing and belts have gone from leather to new materials, wood gunstocks have been upgraded to composite, knives have changed as we have become smarter...Any knife can chop, cut and hack wood...If not your holding a hammer...But realizing that you have better options is called adaptation...And thats survival...
 
LOL. Wood and leather? What were those idjits thinking? That stuff hasn't worked at all, ever.

What is "hard use" again?

Also, are you saying that if you can't hack and slash the vegetation with your knife like a squatter making an illegal farmstead in the Amazon basin, that the knife is incapable of making firewood or taking suitable branches off of a tree?

How these ancient knife cultures thrived without full tang slab handled supersteel machetes absolutely boggles the mind since they were obviously too stupid to invent micarta and kydex.

:thumbup:

hahaha :D
 
Sorry gentleman but I really find it hard to believe the lack of materials knowledge as far in this wood & leather vs composite debate so I had to put this together..This is really plain as day...Just because something works for you or for ancient tribes with no other options doesnt mean it is the best..Advances in materials and products happen for a reason...But I guess you non-believers are still using your green screen apple computers to do all your online knife buying...And carrying brick sized beepers...

Do a general materials tensile and elastic strength comparison..Then find out about impact strength over varying thicknesses of these different materials..In your searches you will find that wood requires a much thicker overall size to compare to the strength of certain composites..Wood also is a varying resistance material and does not hold the same qualities day to day with varying weather conditions and changes..Wood also has the ability to warp and expand/contract with frequent temperature and humidity changes..With wood you are also relying on the natural grain layout that because of nature is not a repeated consistent pattern.. Inconsistent pattern and grain consistency lead to weak spots and can result in unseen failure..

I have been building wood recurve and long bows by hand for over 10 years now since a teenager as a hobby..Have been working with composite bow materials for about 8 years..I also make gunstocks and grips from exotic hardwoods for firearms and custom air guns..I have computer programs to layout the appropriate planing thicknesses and overall tapering requirements for each variety of wood when building a bow..The difference between a solid wood bow a fiberglass backed style and a laminate are staggering..The transition to composites used in modern compound bows are even greater in overall numbers...Doing things not even imaginable with wood..These same rules and numbers transfer to woods use in knife handles and anything else....Pretty much every "Hard Use" firearm I can think of besides the 3rd world friendly AK uses composite grips and stocks over wood as well...

Leather has also been upstaged by the invention of composites in knife sheaths, holster,shoe soles, belts, air pistons and tons general purpose gear..I dont know of to many police officers, military operators or professional shooters that still use or are issued a leather holster....

When in doubt look to what the military and LEO community is using...Millions and billions of dollars are spent in R&D and testing of products...Way more than a guy on youtube with a knife and a 3" sapling can prove...If tomorrow every set of boots with a gun has a Les Stroud knife issued I will change my mind..But I carried a Rat/ESEE 4 in kydex with G10 scales and that never died for five years in Iraq and Afghanistan....Carried a composite and aluminium primary weapon...And a synthetic polymer back up in a kydex holster..I dont remember ever seeing a single wood handled leather sheath anything being issued or carried by one of our boys...But the bad guys in the mountains and caves had outdated wood and leather tools..Because of their advancements thats all they have...Maybe thats why I made it home and they didnt...:eek:

Didnt mean to go on since I just started with an opinion on my thoughts of a knife..Dont know why people made it personal over my views...But people that dont know me making inorrect claims about both my experience and proven scientific facts sometimes need things spelled out for them..Hope this can be taken maturely and not personally....I love wood and the way it looks as much as the next guy...Looks wise I would take a beautiful burl section of Muminga on my knife handle or gunstock any day over composite ..But facts are facts boys..Numbers unfortunately dont lie...
 
Last edited:
When did anyone say this was the end all be all, newest and greatest, most advanced survival knife that everyone should rely on?

I don't expect all new cars to be on the cutting edge of an ideal driving machine, and they don't disappoint since most of them aren't. Same goes for knives, its about combining good materials into a design that works for the intended goal, in this case a traditional bushcrafting knife. Trying to say Mora's are garbage for modern survival is about as useful as beating your skull in against a wall, they are a go to knife for a reason.
You might have gone a bit overboard there.

Best of luck,
-Eric
 
I went back and read the original press release, and nowhere does it say that this is going to be marketed as a "survival" knife.

Actually is says that "it's a knife that you can actually use in the wilderness."

Here's another quote from that press release: Helle approached Stroud to design a new knife - a knife that
could be used by true outdoor enthusiasts seeking the real thing: the natural way of life.
 
Remember gentleman,in the end it`s just a knife for bushcrafting. I have several Helles,and other handmade norwegian knives with leather sheats,and I also have knives made out of sytethic materials like the SRK, or the RC3.

In the end it all depends on what you want to do with it and where you are. I wouldn`t take the Les Stroud knife out with me in the winter when it`s -30 degrees C due to the tang being visible on top of the handle. I`d take my Strømeng 9" and maybe the Helle Viking or the Brusletto Nansenkniven.

I wouldn`t take either of those out with me during the autumn storms where it rains a lot here on the west coast. I`d maybe take the SRK alot due to the FACT that leather CAN contract and get worn out when getting wet and drying out and so on over time.

Alphabravo has a point, but it shouldn`t boil down to leather vs syntethic. One should know what the limitation of the tools one uses is and in the end it really comes down to preference.
 
Bla bla bla....First off there is what looks to be a curly maple WOOD handle that is not scaled, but fully wrapped and pinned.. Secondly it comes with a leather sheath..2 qualities in a knife that fail in REAL survival situations ..bla bla bla
.

I think you went wrong with this sentence.

You are not saying that wood and leather is less then the best.
You are saying that if these materials are used, the knife can NOT be used in a real survival situation in any way. you might as well just trow it on the ground as not to carry the extra weight.

And this is why people are kinda jumping down you throat.

I'm fairly sure this is not what you meant to say. feel free to correct me if I'm wrong
 
I think you went wrong with this sentence.

You are not saying that wood and leather is less then the best.
You are saying that if these materials are used, the knife can NOT be used in a real survival situation in any way. you might as well just trow it on the ground as not to carry the extra weight.

And this is why people are kinda jumping down you throat.

I'm fairly sure this is not what you meant to say. feel free to correct me if I'm wrong

That is actually not my true sentence...Thats a quote someone took out of contex and added a few words to to make me look wrong (ie: bla bla bla)..There was a backing behind that statement...

I never meant, nor did I say that this was a totally useless knife...I said it would be better as a light use trout knife...I explained it was constructed from 2 materials that could fail and have proven to under conditions in real survival...Something I would assume a show like "Survivorman" could label a knife, due to the guys name on the blade and all....In my first posting I was really making a joke out the whole thing..I even put something in there about a fake Paris Hilton Survival knife to be funny...I actually forgot about this posting until I stumbled across it while searching the posts...I was shocked that people had so much to say about the matter and were attacking me for my opinions and telling me I had no experience or knowledge on the subject..If you like the knife then more power to you..The use of classic designs is something enthusiast around the world like to put into action..But it just seemed that some were making pretty blunt statements about materials they dont really know about..Going off of historical cultures as a basis for comparison is not a realistic test of present day situations...I was just correcting peoples statements that were really only argumentative in nature...We are all entitled to our opinions and are allowed to like what we like...Just wanted to put the facts out there since people made me out to be fool for my going against the Les Stroud knife and their personal favorites...I have backed up my previous statement with facts and thats all....In my opinion there are much better options for both the price, size and weight..And I would obviously trust a more modern material...But since emergencies dont make appointments the sad story is if we were all in some sort of a wreck or got stranded on a mountain top on the way across country, none of us would have a big chopper fixed blade in our back pocket...And at that point we would be forced to do as the ancient tribes did and use whats at our disposal to make tools...So I guess all you wood and leather tribal leader guys would be happy at that point..:D

Again..Didnt mean to crap in anyones cookies...Be well everyone
 
Last edited:
Sorry gentleman but I really find it hard to believe the lack of materials knowledge as far in this wood & leather vs composite debate so I had to put this together..This is really plain as day...Just because something works for you or for ancient tribes with no other options doesnt mean it is the best..Advances in materials and products happen for a reason...But I guess you non-believers are still using your green screen apple computers to do all your online knife buying...And carrying brick sized beepers...

No, what you have been overlooking is that many of us found your dismissal of wood and leather, as used for an outdoors knife, overblown. It's not an either/or thing with me. I have a slew of wooden handled puukkos with leather sheaths. I also have a boatload of plastic handled Moras with plastic sheaths that won't rot after centuries in a landfill, a RC-4, and a RC-6, with eventually failure prone from UV damage nylon MOLLE backers, and a Skookum Bush Tool in CPM3V that has micarta slabs, a full tang, but this next to indestructible knife is saddled with a "weak" leather sheath that happens to be pretty damned tough and waterproofed.

Do a general materials tensile and elastic strength comparison..Then find out about impact strength over varying thicknesses of these different materials..In your searches you will find that wood requires a much thicker overall size to compare to the strength of certain composites..Wood also is a varying resistance material and does not hold the same qualities day to day with varying weather conditions and changes..Wood also has the ability to warp and expand/contract with frequent temperature and humidity changes..With wood you are also relying on the natural grain layout that because of nature is not a repeated consistent pattern.. Inconsistent pattern and grain consistency lead to weak spots and can result in unseen failure..

All of this is true. It is also true that in "northern" knives from which the admittedly overpriced Helle Temagami draw much of its design influence has worked with arctic curly birch for centuries. That natural material is tightly grained yet elastic enough, so as far as woods go, it's pretty bomb proof, especially when a stick tanged blade is put through it and peened over at the pommel. Sometimes, having "no choice" in the wood used by a culture turns into a happy coincidence of having on hand the best natural material one could have hoped for in regards to the application.

iisakki_1.jpg


I have been building wood recurve and long bows by hand for over 10 years now since a teenager as a hobby..Have been working with composite bow materials for about 8 years..I also make gunstocks and grips from exotic hardwoods for firearms and custom air guns..I have computer programs to layout the appropriate planing thicknesses and overall tapering requirements for each variety of wood when building a bow..The difference between a solid wood bow a fiberglass backed style and a laminate are staggering..The transition to composites used in modern compound bows are even greater in overall numbers...Doing things not even imaginable with wood..These same rules and numbers transfer to woods use in knife handles and anything else....Pretty much every "Hard Use" firearm I can think of besides the 3rd world friendly AK uses composite grips and stocks over wood as well...

I agree with you that in high stress applications like bows and in accuracy demanding applications as in rifles, that wood has largely been surpassed in everything but the looks department. However, I do not agree that "the same numbers" translate into knife handles. The knife handle sees nothing like the flexing stresses placed upon a bow, nor do they generally sport the sort of length a rifle stock does that makes the stock more likely to warp in changing environmental conditions.

That is why I think you were asked what "hard use" is. It's not like people are summoning up the hand strength to shear their wooden knife handles off of hidden tang knives everyday. Micarta holds up better to cosmetic insults than when nice wood takes a ding, but even in slab sided construction, the same forces that would take the wooden slabs away from their epoxy and crack them around the bolt holes, is probably going to screw up a synthetic handled knife too. It's not as if micarta and the like are indestructible.

As regards water, I am not aware of any wooden handled knife left "in the raw" where total immersion is going to even impart significant moisture to the handle. They are all deeply penetrated by various oils and the guy who knows how to maintain such a knife doesn't allow the oils to dry out. Just like one does not put wooden handled knives in the dishwasher, one does not stand idly by as the handle loses its waterproofing. One reapplies a conditioning treatment to it, same as with leather.

Leather has also been upstaged by the invention of composites in knife sheaths, holster,shoe soles, belts, air pistons and tons general purpose gear..I dont know of to many police officers, military operators or professional shooters that still use or are issued a leather holster....

Leather still has its place in many applications. It is still the standard sole on dress shoes. Many folks, say as in the EESE community, ditch the kydex for leather oddly enough. High quality gun belts are still made of leather and so too are most concealment holsters. You are conflating the suitability of a material to a particular purpose and the convenience of having gear that is more amenable to neglect. Leather serves just as admirably as wood does in knife applications, from handles to sheaths, but it demands more attention from its owner than plastics do. Whether one wants to take on that level of responsibility is really why leather has been supplanted in many of the applications you described.

When in doubt look to what the military and LEO community is using...Millions and billions of dollars are spent in R&D and testing of products...Way more than a guy on youtube with a knife and a 3" sapling can prove...If tomorrow every set of boots with a gun has a Les Stroud knife issued I will change my mind..But I carried a ESEE 4 in kydex with G10 scales and that never died for five years in Iraq and Afghanistan....Carried a composite and aluminium primary weapon...And a synthetic polymer back up in a kydex holster..I dont remember ever seeing a single wood handled leather sheath anything being issued or carried by one of our boys...But the bad guys in the mountains and caves had outdated wood and leather tools..Because of their advancements thats all they have...Maybe thats why I made it home and they didnt...:eek:

You can bet somewhere in theater someone was carrying an old school polished leather washer handled Randall. Yes, the military and and most police issue nothing that is wood or leather as duty gear anymore, but I don't look to that community for cues on anything as regards what I prefer to take care of. They are in the business of assuming that the soldier will abuse or neglect his equipment rather than give it the attention it may otherwise deserve because that is the nature of "community property." If I might be charged for the loss or damage to my holster, I certainly want some Bianchi nylon contraption than one of those old school black or brown polished leather flap holsters. That said, such a holster can and has been made to campaign without falling apart, even in the jungle. One just can't neglect maintaining it.

In fact, why are you carrying an old school 1095 carbon steel blade into harm's way when stainless has, without doubt, proven more resistant to environmental degradation to its edge?:p The numbers don't lie after all.

Didnt mean to go on since I just started with an opinion on my thoughts of a knife..Dont know why people made it personal over my views...But people that dont know me making inorrect claims about both my experience and proven scientific facts sometimes need things spelled out for them..Hope this can be taken maturely and not personally....I love wood and the way it looks as much as the next guy...Looks wise I would take a beautiful burl section of Muminga on my knife handle or gunstock any day over composite ..But facts are facts boys..Numbers unfortunately dont lie...

It was your dismissive attitude towards "traditional materials" that got you embroiled in this little "controversy." Your "numbers" and appreciation of synthetic materials in no way diminishes the fact that guys who know how to take care of their stuff can totally make wood, leather--and bone, horn, and antler--work while lasting a lifetime of field use to boot.
 
Last edited:
American Puukko ---You have supported your beliefs and that I respect.I think my initial statements were way overblown by others leading to the debate and I tried to relay that above...I believe I tried to make clear the reasons for my beliefs but I still see your point of view and agree with many of the points you made..

The one statement though that I continued to hear was the fact that "guys who know how to take care of their stuff......" ... "with the right care" and so on...Im sure that careful care of any object in the world could result in prolonged life...My point is that when your on more than a weekend hike, and all you have is what is on your back, rubbing a sheath down with oil may not be the first thing on your mind while "surviving"..

The "northern" knives you have shown are of a completely different handle design then the Les Stroud knife..The tang is wrapped with no tang exposure and capped in your pictures..Probably done via insertion of a tapered tang..Leading to less deformation of the initial wood slab..Please note I said the Stroud was " Wrapped and Pinned" .Also I had stated that the Stroud was made of " what looks to be curly maple" in my initial views of the knife..Points could also be made to the uncharacteristic strength of ironwood and other exotics or woods that have been underwater of all things for decades...But in most cases these highly compressed woods are not used the normal handle applications of knives..If you have found knives that utilize these types of wood and they work well for your given needs then that is great...But they may not something a "normal" survival scenario would have at its disposal..

My reasons for the RC/ESEE 1095 choice was for my intended needs in an extremely dry environment and a lifetime no questions guarantee..If I had been in a tropical environment and had the options, my system would suit the situation at hand..My reference was driven more to the G10 and Kydex ...A knife handle made from wood with the strength of G10 would be over 1.25" thick as opposed to the .50" overall on the RC3/4...The kydex sheath also offers more attachment options and easier cleanout than any traditional leather sheath..Something I also look for in a system..

I dont dismiss the values or ancient uses of natural materials...Some of my favorite items in my collection are made from wood...I have old leather handle Ka Bars that last due to maintenance..And a Helle Grizzly that has been on my hip many a hunt...As I said I just feel there are better options out there in an all around survival knife..

Be well and thanks for the debate...This has become interesting..
 
I have some experience using my Helle knives while on some hikes and for woodcrafting. They have all performed very well for everything I've asked.

While I agree that maybe this is not the "best" survival knife going I do find being in the woods using a knife made from natural materials very enjoyable. It's nice to have something with a wood handle and a leather sheath rather than micarta and kydex sometimes.

I don't stick my Helles through car doors or baton them through pipes. But they seem to function very well in real woods tasks. This one looks pretty good and I may add it to my "to get" list.

Just my opinions.
 
I was talking about larger knives even though I do own a 2 and I ma very satisfied with it, I find it to thick for finer tasks

Thats when I bring out my BHK bushcrafter
 
All said it is an attractive if not quite finished to expectations knife. I wouldn't buy one for the price they are asking ($100+).

alphabravo, Where on earth do you catch trout large enough to require the use of the Temagami (pretty much my definition of a trout knife)?
 
Having watched many if not all Survivorman shows I cannot remember the last time I saw Les use a knife. He save a blade and uses rocks etc. He should be promoting a SE Wave by leather man.

Blatant use of celebrity endorsement by corporate world. Good on Les for making money on this though for $200 it had better be a hell of a knife.

Beautiful knife.

$200 though ? I'll pass. Way overpriced...


tostig
 
Back
Top