- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Messages
- 2,898
After having used SR101, I don't think the "90% of the performance at 50-70% of the price" saying really applies. It held and edge better than my infi stuff has, doing the same job. So for regular knife use I'd actually say that you get more performance for less money.
I used to think the same way and still kind of do..here are my reasons for and against buying INFI;
PROS
-The corrosion resistance is really nice for me as i hate patinas (they look cool but i think they are just dirty...lol) and since i am buying these knives mostly for TEOTWAWKI / ZA, there is likely going to be limited supplies to look after and maintain your blades, so, INFI.
-Ease of sharpening in field / with limited supplies
-Way better designs are released in INFI
-Only (some) INFI knives (AFAIK) have the Nuclear Meltdown treatment, which i absolutely love and wish every knife had
-SR-101 knives aren't offered with G10 handles (excluding OP2W knives), which are a must have for me
-If a knife is released in INFI and SR-101, the INFI versions usually has more features that make the knife. Think TGLB, the BG doesn't have the LB treatment, the hollow grind or Nuclear Meltdown treatment.
-If i wanted a high carbon steel knife, there are soo many more options elsewhere, for cheaper
-INFI is bomb proof
-Go big or go home
CONS
- Doesn't hold an edge for as long compared to SR-101
- Way more expensive than SR-101
The way i see it now, INFI is worth the price tag and SR-101's only PROS are that it holds an edge longer (which is a negative because it's harder / takes to sharpen with limited supplies in TEOTWAWKI / ZA scenarios - what i am buying the knife for) and it's cheaper (INFI's price tag is justifiable with all of it's PROS).
YMMV!
Last edited: