Somebody wrote: if you want a knife with zero blade play even after many years of hard use - buy a Sebenza. True?
Or get a fixed blade.
Under heavy continuous use over many years I think all locks will have issues. I have heavily used slipjoints though that still snap open tight.
But of course they don't need to lock. Just from the physics
of the issue, if the normal stress on the knife can be dispersed
or handled by a non-locking part... it would reduce the
stress on the locking mechanism and it would therefore last longer.
Axis locks put stress on a bar that contacts the top of the tang
that is not part of the lock. that is good.
There is little or no stress on the lock unless you put force on the spine.
Lockbacks put stress on the lock directly.
Framelocks and linerlocks put some stress on a bar like the
Axis lock but there is always pressure on the lock itself.
With all there is wear on the locking mechanism.
The most friction coming from Frame and Liner locks.
The least from the Axis... it just draws accross the tang.
With lockbacks there is friction during lockup when the
spring snaps shut .... only a little while unlocking.
Axis has thin springs which in general should last a long time
but could fail under certain extremes or from being damaged.
Lockbacks have springs but are usually rather stout and should
last a long long time.
The major weaknesses are:
Lockbacks - pressure on lock from use
Frame/Liner locks - pressure on lock continuously while open
Axis Lock - springs
So I vote Axis in that I believe that the omega springs will last longer
then the locking mechanisms on the lockback or frame/liner locks
under hard use.
Ok.... back to work... man, talk about procrastination!
