Lock on Delica and Pro-grip?

Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
23
can anyone tell me what kinda lock it is on delica and pro-grip respectively? and also how it will stand against an axis lock. also if anyone had any problems with the lock on these 2 models (or any other spydercos with the same type of lock) lemme know... trying to get an overall picture here of the strength of the lock... i tried to to a search for this but couldnt really find anything.
 
The Delica has a lock-back design. I'm not totally sure about the progrip since I have never owned one but I am pretty sure that it has a lock-back design. IMO this is a very sturdy and secure locking system. It may not be as cool or in vogue as say an axis lock or a frame-lock but it holds very well. Hope this helps.
 
I believe that both of these knives use a standard lock back mechanism. In my opinion this setup is inferior to the Axis lock in virtually every way that matters.

The Axis lock is exceptionally smooth to open one handed, and very easy to close one handed. Lockbacks are neither.

Axis locks generally have no blade play. Lockbacks almost always have blade play.

Axis locks are designed to push gunk and dirt off of the locking surfaces. Lockbacks smash lint and debris into the lock notch and sometimes do not engage reliably because of this.

Axis locks get better with use, as the tang wears and the lock bar seats even more solidly. Lockbacks lose solidity and reliability when they wear.

Axis locks can be flicked open. Generally speaking, lockbacks cannot.

The ultimate breaking strength of the Axis lock is very high, likely higher than that of a similar quality lockback. Perhaps somebody can confirm this with some actual testing numbers.

As far as I can tell, the lockback is inferior to the Axis lock by a significant margin. I really can't understand why some manufacturers continue to market it.
 
ok i understand the axis lock is better. question is if it really matters. most folders dont come with it. and people carry folders from spyderco, emerson etc daily year in and year out without problems. i've yet to hear about the locks failing or that they cant open it smoothly with one hand etc.
axis lock is only available on a very limited number of folders, most costing $110+ or more.
 
You can get an Axis lock on a griptilian, mini griptilian ($41-$53) and on a BM705 for around $90-$95. imo, axis is to fuel injection as the rest is to carbeurators.
 
yup im checking those out as well :-)
hard to decide. also checking out the SOG knives, some comes with the arc-lock which is equal to the axis lock from what i understand....
 
Originally posted by Sticky
You can get an Axis lock on a griptilian, mini griptilian ($41-$53) and on a BM705 for around $90-$95. imo, axis is to fuel injection as the rest is to carbeurators.

Let me preface my remarks by saying that I will be getting my first BM within a month or two and it may be the 705. Having said that,I wouldn't discount the lock-back so quickly they've been around for a long time and for good reason. They hold tight, take a heck of a lot of pressure and are easy to operate IMO. To illustrate this point let me use your fuel injection analogy. Given the choice between some new fangled 4x4 with FI and a FJ-40 Land Cruiser with a carb I'd take the cruiser any day. There's a reason that they sale for $30,000 after being refurbed. And that reason is taht they are tried and true (not to mention just plain cool). I'm not trying to start a fight here just expressing an opinion :) :) .
 
darkhelmet,

I would like to add my .02 worth to this thread.

Both the Delica and Pro-Grip are lockbacks.

The Spyderco lockbacks are fairly smooth to open with
one hand, and will get smoother with time. You can also
close them one handed without any problems. This is in part
to the forward position of the lock bar.
Gunk can build up in the notch and affect the lock reliability.
This is only a problem if you do not maintain your knives, a
couple of seconds with a straightened paper clip will clean out
the notch. A "can-o-air" also is handy for knife care.

Lockback can have some vertical blade play, this is because of the
clearances needed in the design for the lock to operate.

My Benchmade 940 axis lock has more side to side blade play than my
Spyderco Police.

I carried a Delica for my EDC for about five years working in a machine shop and it still locks up a solidly as it did when new.

Bruceter
 
Originally posted by fishbulb
[1]The Axis lock is exceptionally smooth to open one handed, and very easy to close one handed. Lockbacks are neither.

[2]Axis locks generally have no blade play. Lockbacks almost always have blade play.

[3]Axis locks are designed to push gunk and dirt off of the locking surfaces. Lockbacks smash lint and debris into the lock notch and sometimes do not engage reliably because of this.

[4]Axis locks get better with use, as the tang wears and the lock bar seats even more solidly. Lockbacks lose solidity and reliability when they wear.

[5]Axis locks can be flicked open. Generally speaking, lockbacks cannot.

[6]The ultimate breaking strength of the Axis lock is very high, likely higher than that of a similar quality lockback. Perhaps somebody can confirm this with some actual testing numbers.
1. I suppose you've not used spyderco's lockback extensively, cause I find many of them smooth, or will get smooth with a drop or two of lube.
2. With the exception of the Chinook, which I tried VERY hard to test the blade play, none of my lockbacks from Spyderco have one.
3. Point taken, but don't forget I carry at least two spyderco (I used to carry 2 folders, now 3) which are lockbacks and I've yet to have one with enough gunk to cause it to fail.
4. Lock being worn out is fairly common thing. I've heard a fair bit of omega springs breaking in here, while the actual chances of breaking a lockback seems to be when I send one back for sharpening/checking out and they break it with their testing machine.
5. Point taken. I cannot flick the Merlin without a Spydie drop, but then having it easily flicked isn't necessarily a good thing. One good look at Canadian Criminal Code or a chat with a cop suddenly makes lockbacks more desirable to carry, becuase of the clause that knives open by centrifugal force would be considered illegal, and you can't never know what a cop might do to make that happen.
6. I know there are alternatives, but despite the Axis lock still being better, I don't see how it matters whenever I consider a lockback safe, and when somehow I sent it back to Spyderco, they manage to consider it unsatisfactory and replace it with a new one. I don't feel like jibbing them off all the time, but I don't think they like any of their locks until they're sure that their machine won't break it with maximum setting or something like that.
In my opinion, your lockback comments are fairly ill-founded. I'm not saying the Axis lock isn't superior, but I'm saying that the lockback isn't as inferior as you make it sounded to be.
 
I would like to backup the post by Bruceter. I´ve been carrying an all steel Delica for about 5 years (not continuously, but regularly). It locks up real good and has absolutely no play. As long as you maintain your knife frequently it´s also very reliable.

The only remark I´d like to make is about smoothness. I own both a steel handled Delica and a Zytel handled version and the latter isn´t smooth at all (this is just my experience, could have something to do with wear). The all steel version is very smooth and can be flicked open easily. This might be a concern with both the Zytel handled Pro Grip and Delica.

Hope this helps.
 
Originally posted by calyth
1. I suppose you've not used spyderco's lockback extensively, cause I find many of them smooth, or will get smooth with a drop or two of lube.
2. With the exception of the Chinook, which I tried VERY hard to test the blade play, none of my lockbacks from Spyderco have one.
3. Point taken, but don't forget I carry at least two spyderco (I used to carry 2 folders, now 3) which are lockbacks and I've yet to have one with enough gunk to cause it to fail.
4. Lock being worn out is fairly common thing. I've heard a fair bit of omega springs breaking in here, while the actual chances of breaking a lockback seems to be when I send one back for sharpening/checking out and they break it with their testing machine.
5. Point taken. I cannot flick the Merlin without a Spydie drop, but then having it easily flicked isn't necessarily a good thing. One good look at Canadian Criminal Code or a chat with a cop suddenly makes lockbacks more desirable to carry, becuase of the clause that knives open by centrifugal force would be considered illegal, and you can't never know what a cop might do to make that happen.
6. I know there are alternatives, but despite the Axis lock still being better, I don't see how it matters whenever I consider a lockback safe, and when somehow I sent it back to Spyderco, they manage to consider it unsatisfactory and replace it with a new one. I don't feel like jibbing them off all the time, but I don't think they like any of their locks until they're sure that their machine won't break it with maximum setting or something like that.
In my opinion, your lockback comments are fairly ill-founded. I'm not saying the Axis lock isn't superior, but I'm saying that the lockback isn't as inferior as you make it sounded to be.

1. I was not reffering to friction on the pivot, but rather to the way a lockback bar has to "ride" along the blade tang. In my experience this results in a noticeably non-linear force required to fully open the knife.

2. The vast majority of lockbacks that I have seen have distinct vertical blade play. This includes both Spydercos and other quality makes.

3. Yes, it is pretty easy to keep that hole from gumming up. It is even easier if you don't have to worry about it at all. This is a particular concern if the knife is going to be used outdoors or elsewhere where there is a lot of debris to clog things up.

4. Everything that I have seen indicates that the actual rate of Axis lock breakage is extremely low. After several years on the market there have been maybe 6 or 7 posts here that an Axis spring broke. Generally, a broken spring doesn't hurt the knife at all. There have been several occasions where somebody did not even realize that one was busted until they took the knife part for cleaning. Catastrophic failure and "wearing out" are quite different. Lockbacks get sloppy as they wear.

5. I suppose that there are specific situations where a flickable knife is a bad thing. I have yet to hear of anybody being prosecuted for having an Axis lock knife because it can be flicked open. If one is that worried about it then perhaps carrying a knife at all may be a mistake.

6. I'm not entirely sure what the point of this one was. If made correctly both an Axis lock and a Lockback are very strong.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "ill-founded". Every statement I've made has been a result of personal experience with the various locking formats.

Are there any advantages that a lockback has over an Axis or Arc lock that I may have missed?
 
Actually there is something my Spydies do that my axis locks don't..... when ya' open 'em, they make a really nice "CLACK!!". I like little $hit like that.:D
 
Originally posted by fishbulb
1. I was not reffering to friction on the pivot, but rather to the way a lockback bar has to "ride" along the blade tang. In my experience this results in a noticeably non-linear force required to fully open the knife.

2. The vast majority of lockbacks that I have seen have distinct vertical blade play. This includes both Spydercos and other quality makes.

3. Yes, it is pretty easy to keep that hole from gumming up. It is even easier if you don't have to worry about it at all. This is a particular concern if the knife is going to be used outdoors or elsewhere where there is a lot of debris to clog things up.

4. Everything that I have seen indicates that the actual rate of Axis lock breakage is extremely low. After several years on the market there have been maybe 6 or 7 posts here that an Axis spring broke. Generally, a broken spring doesn't hurt the knife at all. There have been several occasions where somebody did not even realize that one was busted until they took the knife part for cleaning. Catastrophic failure and "wearing out" are quite different. Lockbacks get sloppy as they wear.

5. I suppose that there are specific situations where a flickable knife is a bad thing. I have yet to hear of anybody being prosecuted for having an Axis lock knife because it can be flicked open. If one is that worried about it then perhaps carrying a knife at all may be a mistake.

6. I'm not entirely sure what the point of this one was. If made correctly both an Axis lock and a Lockback are very strong.

I'm not quite sure what you mean by "ill-founded". Every statement I've made has been a result of personal experience with the various locking formats.

Are there any advantages that a lockback has over an Axis or Arc lock that I may have missed?
1. then you're saying something that I don't consider have anything to do with smooth, and that's a point taken. The way the lockback is created will have it riding the tang until it's opened. I don't know how you open your knives but that have never been any of my concerns.
2. the vast majority of the lockback that I've seen does not have vertical blade play. I own and handled 5 Spyderco lockbacks, and FYI, the bladeplay on my Chinook isn't vertical, more like a wobble that could be solved with the pivot to be tightened. From the classic Endura, to the miniature Ladybug, I've yet to be able to make it have vertical blade play. If you say you've handled a remarkable amount of Spyderco lockbacks that have vertical bladeplay, perhaps either I'm having very good luck, or you're having very bad luck. I don't seem to hear vertical blade play (spare the Chinook) be a big problem in either the Spyderco forum in here or the one in Spyderco's site.
3. For use in outdoors settings, then I would agree that not having something gumming up the works would be a lot better. However, I would be just as confident carrying a Spyderco lockback than a Benchmade Axis lock.
4. Have you seen a personal catastrophic failure of a lockback? I can tell you I haven't. The only knives that I seem to be able to make them fail are linerlocks with a smooth ramp. It is true that the Axis lock does not fail catastrophically easily, but I'm sure the breakage of the omega springs isn't the few times that have been reported in BFC. Lockback also fails more than reported. If you should worry about lock failure (like in a outdoor setting), carry a fixed blade.
As to wearing out, I've also yet to hear of complaints about lock backs getting very sloppy. It probably does make it less secure, but not to the point that your words make it sound like.
5. I don't specifically worry about the law, but having a blade with good blade retention is a good thing. If I do somehow manage to get a cop ask to see my pocket knife, I don't think he's going to take it away easily because of the blade retention. I do have tested a couple of Axis locks (courtesy of jjcoolay's AFCK Axis prototype and a small carbon fiber axis), and I know it's not likely it would be much of a concern, but the fact of the matter is, the Axis lock's blade retension is less than the lcokback. Is it going to open in your pocket? No.
For me, blade retention is a bigger concern than flickability. Flicking a knife is mostly a matter of technique, however I've had knives open in my pocket and nick my hands before.
The ultimate breaking strength of the Axis lock is very high, likely higher than that of a similar quality lockback. Perhaps somebody can confirm this with some actual testing numbers.
It is correct that Axis lock is seen very safe, and very strong, and also the lockback is very strong too. The point I was trying to make is that Spyderco seems to be unsatisfied when their knives are not up to their requirements, to the point where knives that I deem safe will be deem unsatisfactory by them. I don't see why there's a need for this super-uber-ultimate strong lock when the idea of having a folding knife isn't to beat the hell out of it. A lockback have significant amount of strength in it, and when a good quality one breaks, I don't see how I'm going to be able to do that unless I intend to break it. Same goes for the Axis lock. I don't see how I would be able to break the Axis lock unless I truly intended to break it. My point is this, the Axis lock and the lockback have significant strength in it, so that under normal usage, their theoretical strength does not make them any better. The matter of having an Axis lock because it's stronger than a lockback is largely an academic one.
I was refering to your comments as ill-founded because I do not understand why you would say that lockback folders have a more than signifacnt of them with vertical blade play, and the fact that you wrote your whole comment that reads like a bashing piece to a lockback. If you want to say personal experience, then the vertical blade play issue remains a dichotomy; your experience says they're very prone to vertical blade play, while mine says nothing as such. I do not consider your original comments as fair to lockbacks in general (not counting those crappy knockoffs on the streets).

Edited to fix stupid mistakes
 
fishbulb, perhaps you've had some lemons ,or maybe you're a "lock snob". I have yet to meet a Spyderco that I couldn't flip open if I wantted to, including the Dragonfly. I find them very smooth to open, with zero blade play in any direction. My CS folders have similar qualities. Very strong lock, a little harder to open with stud as opposed to hole.

The "clack" is one of my favorite things about the lockback - you know for sure when it's locked. On the other hand, my CRKT liner locks open quietly, so I really have to jam them open to be sure they're locked.
 
Lockbacks are great and cheap, but they do have their problems. The worse being dirt in the lock and wear to the rocker arm. These are easily handled by being aware of the state of your blade.

Axis locks are new, nobody knows how they will hold up to 30 years of abuse like a lockback. However, they won't close on your hand like a lockback when they fail, so from many points of view they are better.

The Axis suffer from one design flaw, a major one in my viewpoint. The Axis requires relatively thick handles for its operation. If you like slim handles or desire them for blade concealment or just the convenience of fitting in your pocket with keys and change, you can't get this easily in the axis lock, particularly the inexpensive ones (e.g. Griptillian.) If you want a thin handle on your knife, don't look to the Axis.
 
sog made the access card (credit card knife) and it got the arc-lock and it's pretty thin isnt it? and cheap too... like $30 or so, so it seems price isn't an issue when putting a arc-lock/axis lock on knives...
 
I don't know that I would consider myself a lock snob. I really like linerlocks, and those are considered by many to be undeserving of the name "lock".

I would agree that the sound of a lockback is quite cool. However, if you are considering that as a serious advantage than you may be reaching.

My statements about lockbacks were primarily based on Buck and Gerber products. Many of my friends have these knives so I get to handle lots of them.

Spyderco lockbacks may be quite different from other manufacturers' but the ones that I have handled were not.

Part of this is personal opinion. Even before I know what an Axis lock was, much less owned one, I did not like lockbacks. Unless they have some spectacular advantage that I am not awere of, I doubt that I ever will.
 
Originally posted by fishbulb
[1]I don't know that I would consider myself a lock snob. I really like linerlocks, and those are considered by many to be undeserving of the name "lock".

I would agree that the sound of a lockback is quite cool. However, if you are considering that as a serious advantage than you may be reaching.

[2]My statements about lockbacks were primarily based on Buck and Gerber products. Many of my friends have these knives so I get to handle lots of them.

[3]Spyderco lockbacks may be quite different from other manufacturers' but the ones that I have handled were not.

[4]Part of this is personal opinion. Even before I know what an Axis lock was, much less owned one, I did not like lockbacks. Unless they have some spectacular advantage that I am not awere of, I doubt that I ever will.
1. Unlike others, I do appreciate a well made linerlock. It is easier to open a linerlock cause it has less retention. It's all in a balance. I like the CRKT M16 cause I did not manage to make it fail, and blade retention is ok (a cop tested it and said ok). However, the CRKT Crawford/Kasper stays at home because it's a lot looser than the M16. I do carry a Starmate and I definately think it's a good implementation of liner lock.
2. You do realize that the threadstarter wanted to know about Spyderco's lockback, and you did not explicitly say your opinions are based on Buck or Gerbers, if you don't believe me go ahead and read your original statements.
3. Then I would say you have a very good knack of touching bad lockbacks from Spyderco, I'm sure Mr. Glesser would appreciate your uncanny knack for bad locks.
4. Lockbacks aren't spectacular, but on my terms, they're reliable enough, and they're by no means that inferior. I myself consider a liner lock inferior unless made with good quality, and with fairly good reasons - lack of good blade retension and liner slipping off the ramp. While some of your reasons are valid (such as dirt and grime causing a lock failure), many of your comments are either overblown or not experienced by many.
I'm not trying to flame you per se, but I just don't see your comments eye to eye. My critique by no means is a personal attack to you, and if you've taken it as such, I apologize for my zeal to critisize.
 
Back
Top