- Joined
- Feb 19, 2013
- Messages
- 2,051
I recently got a Lonestar EDC of off the Flea Market. I wanted to compare it to my EDCII that I carry to work every day. I will do a comparison to the Bushboot later for Duder, but I fear the point is moot as this is likely the knife that he was considering when he requested a comparison in another thread. What everyone has been saying about it is correct, it is basically an EDCII handle shape with a clip point.


But this little knife feels very different in the hand than my EDCII. The EDCII is 5/32" with a TT while the Lonestar is 1/8" SFT.



But as the above pictures show, the handle of the Lonestar is noticeably thicker that that of the EDCII.

The width of the handle at the bullseye of the EDCII is 0.783"

Whereas the width of the Lonestar at a similar place is 0.881". These are not exact as I only have so many hands. But, overall I am liking this little knife a great deal.







The finish on the handles of the Lonestar are very grippy. I would not hesitate to use this knife in the mud, blood and beer. I love the way the thicker handles feel as well. I am not sure if this is something that Andy is going to do for all of the Lonestars, but I am really digging it on this Lonestar.


But this little knife feels very different in the hand than my EDCII. The EDCII is 5/32" with a TT while the Lonestar is 1/8" SFT.



But as the above pictures show, the handle of the Lonestar is noticeably thicker that that of the EDCII.

The width of the handle at the bullseye of the EDCII is 0.783"

Whereas the width of the Lonestar at a similar place is 0.881". These are not exact as I only have so many hands. But, overall I am liking this little knife a great deal.







The finish on the handles of the Lonestar are very grippy. I would not hesitate to use this knife in the mud, blood and beer. I love the way the thicker handles feel as well. I am not sure if this is something that Andy is going to do for all of the Lonestars, but I am really digging it on this Lonestar.