- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Messages
- 1,236
Yeah, the whole ultralight thing seems to really polarize people!
I don't see the need to get worked up over the internet any more, so I must be getting old.
I consider UL hiking more of a "sport" than wilderness survival...I would be hesitant to go on big UL trips across uncharted wild lands for instance. But then most people go "heavy backpacking" on well-travelled trails where you could probably get by with an SAK classic, or nothing.
But I think that bothers a lot of people who like to feel like they need the gear because a) they paid for it and b) if you admit you don't need the gear then you also have to admit what you're doing isn't very hardcore.
On the other hand it's also true that if you head off on your own, the potential is always there for a survival situation, in which you would be happier if you had a solid knife.
So like everything else in the world, the real answer to the question, "who is right? the ultralighters or the heavyweighters?" is actually yes, if...and no, but...
I don't see the need to get worked up over the internet any more, so I must be getting old.
I consider UL hiking more of a "sport" than wilderness survival...I would be hesitant to go on big UL trips across uncharted wild lands for instance. But then most people go "heavy backpacking" on well-travelled trails where you could probably get by with an SAK classic, or nothing.
But I think that bothers a lot of people who like to feel like they need the gear because a) they paid for it and b) if you admit you don't need the gear then you also have to admit what you're doing isn't very hardcore.
On the other hand it's also true that if you head off on your own, the potential is always there for a survival situation, in which you would be happier if you had a solid knife.
So like everything else in the world, the real answer to the question, "who is right? the ultralighters or the heavyweighters?" is actually yes, if...and no, but...