Interesting.
The revisionists say that the claim that "most" heat loss is from an old military survival manual that says 45% or so is lost from the head and neck.
I never heard that claim. I did hear "up to half" from when I was a young Scout.
The BMJ article concludes that "Any uncovered part of the body loses heat and will reduce the core body temperature proportionally." That would mean the head and neck are nothing special - just another part of the body. (But the sole basis of that conclusion is a study of folks immersed in 17C water and given drugs that prevent shivering.
http://jap.physiology.org/content/1...e216189c8075cde526cb34ee&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha )
Most of the science I find from the last ten years supports loss of up to 30% from the head and neck because: 1) the area has a disproportionate blood supply; and 2) unlike the rest of the body, blood vessels close to the surface of the head and neck do not constrict when cold. The head and neck are like a window that does not close when it gets cold outside -- not just another part of the body.
So this Phd says:
"Thirty percent of body heat is lost through the neck and head so it is especially important to cover these areas well."
CC Austin, PhD,, SAREC [Science of Anticipation*Recognition*Evaluation*Control of Health Risks ]
ANYWAY, what's the point of the revisionists beyond feeling superior? What is their advice to the newbie on the basis of their "shocking discovery" of a "myth"? Surely NOT to go into the wilds in Winter without a head covering.
I think the advice should remain, "Take an insulating hat or cap and put it on before you are really cold." 30% - or even 10% - could be the difference.