M6 vs Camp Tramp

The "Earlier" Ratweilers - all of the Ratweiler prior to the last run of Ratweilers had those nice scales. So, did the Rat Mastiff and the Rat Daddy.

UNFORTUNATELY, I ordered from the last run of the Ratweilers. There was no notice that they were going to change the scales. The final run of Ratweilers was when (IMO) the micarta scales slipped a few notches in finish quality. Now many of the micarta scales are a little fuzzy and some are not well radiused. :confused:

I liked the diagonal grooves on the HRLM and RMD micarta scales and the HRLM and RMD had some decent radius/curves to the scales, but they were still a little fuzzy and the micarta is not as finely polished as it used to be on the earlier Ratweilers, RM and RD. The G10 RMD has a better finish! But, G10 is heavier.

I guess they wanted to differentiate/downgrade the quality of the micarta finish from the Busse line more (?????).


The Earlier Ratweiler scales were MUCH nicer!!! I wish Swamp Rat, Jerry, Eric, Jennifer, et-al would seriously consider going back to the quality of the earlier scales.


I honestly don't care for the thumb ramp on the Ratweiler and I like the blade shape better on the Chopweiler. I can't remember if I cared for the index finger recess or not, but I know I am VERY fine without it on the Chopweiler.

I have the G10 Chopweiler and I am very happy with the scales. A little more radius to the scales would likely be nicer (less square) and I would have prefered the diagonal groove like on the RMD or HRLM, but the G10 at least has a decent finish and without fuzz. :thumbup:

So, with "G10" scales, I prefer my G10 Chopweiler over-all over the Ratweiler and DEFINITELY over the last run of the Ratweiler!

The earlier Ratweiler has prettier scales and a sexier looking handle, but I don't know that it is any more functional and again, I prefer the Chopweiler's blade and lack of thumb ramp.

But, obviously opinions will differ.


.

The reason for the "downgrade" was the scales on the original run were actually more expensive and time consuming to manufacture than the Fusion scales. I agree with you that the older ones look much better, but with a cost/price ratio to stay with it was much easier to simplify the process. Theres no poor radiusing, theres simply much less, the scales are much flatter on the current models.

The fuzz is actually so easy to deal with I dont see a need for the shop to sit and sand it off, I'd rather have my knives quicker.
 
Love this thread!

I have a CT, CW and a RW. It's really hard to pick a favorite. I will probably keep all three for a long while and take my time deciding which one is the best!:)

I had a M6 and parted ways with it. It is a heck of a blade with a really comfortable handle. I just din't like the balance.

I really need to get a Busse FSH and see how it stacks up against my Rats.

Stephen
 
The Busse FSH line up is probably my all time favorite... Just too expensive to own a bunch of them. :eek:
 
Based on all the info given, I could probably choose between any of the three (old or new Ratweiler, CT) and be a very happy camper- don't think there is a bad choice in the bunch. If I had to place them in an order of preference based on all the comments and pictures it would be 1) old style Rat (love those scales) 2) CT 3) new style Rat. And no...I cannot afford all three:) Its tough to make this call without handling the blade first, but I have a great deal of trust in the knowledge and experience of those responding in this thread.
 
Whichever knife you ultimately decide to purchase... trust me... it won't be your last busse family knife. They are fantastic products. My first taste of Kool-aid was on the lower end of the Busse scale with a Scrap Yard Dumpster mutt. That led to the purchase of a dogfather... and then some Swamp Rats... and then a whole lot of Busse's. I guess you could say that I kinda tested the waters before diving in. ;)

My advice... if I may be so presumptuous... is to call your credit card company and increase your limit! :D These knives are an incredible value for the quality you receive!:thumbup:
 
Ok, another question: Where does the Battle Rat fit in, how would it compare to say, the CT and Ratweiler? I know it has a bit longer blade, anyone have some hands-on experience with both?
 
I'd have to hit the scales with them, but I'd wager that a Battle Rat doesnt weigh a whole lot more than a Ratwieler. Its a good compromise between weight and chopping ability. My preference for micarta has me going for the Rat Mastiff in leu of my Battle Rat, the res-c wants to stick to my hands and causes rub sores and blisters. I can deal with impact vibrations, but the tacky nature of res-c just eats me up. If I get the time to sit and take a couple more pics I'll put the BR and RM in the lineup. :)
 
The Battle Rat also comes in a few different flavors. There is a Satin Battle Rat, which is different from the other configurations in that it has (IIRC) a full-height grind on it. It is not just that the finish is differnet, but the grind as well. Heat treat may also be different on it, although I am just saying this based on a fading memory. I'm sure someone will chime in and confirm my thought, or maybe refute it.

Anyway, I have both the old school Ratweiler and a Satin Battle Rat. The SBR really is the Rolls Royce of the BR line. As such, I have never even entertained the thought of getting a regular BR, which feels a bit different in hand. Also, I intend to keep both my RW and SBR even though there may be some overlap in function. They both are just that good!
 
The reason for the "downgrade" was the scales on the original run were actually more expensive and time consuming to manufacture than the Fusion scales. I agree with you that the older ones look much better, but with a cost/price ratio to stay with it was much easier to simplify the process. Theres no poor radiusing, theres simply much less, the scales are much flatter on the current models.

The fuzz is actually so easy to deal with I dont see a need for the shop to sit and sand it off, I'd rather have my knives quicker.



Sorry.... I WILL NOT agree!!!!! - EVER! - Unless, the Swamp were to cut prices dramatically for UN-Finished knives!

Then, they can just send me:
- an uncoated tempered and sharpened blade,
- shaped but unfinished scales (as they currently are)
- and a little bag with pins.
- Knock off about 40% for the kit version, and I will be quite happy.


When I am paying the prices I pay for what "should" be "finished" Swamp Rat knives, I want them to at least do a decent job "Finishing" the scales. I don't care if it takes a few minutes more than Fusion scales.

But, I DO care about received half-....... finished scales on what I consider Pretty darn expensive knives! Well over $200 for a Chopweiler after shipping is NO-Where close to inexpensive!

Busse knives are VERY expensive. Just because Swamp Rats are less, doesn't make Swamp Rat knives anything close to cheap.

Yes it is a great knife. But, luckily for me it came with a G10 options. (*Thanks Eric!). But, I had to pay a $20.00 premium to get "finished" looking G10 scales.


It would be easy enough for me to buff off the corners of the micarta at the belly and spine "IF" the blades were satin. But, with coated blades any buffing or sanding strips the coating.

The real tough parts to make look decent are at the ricasso and pommel. All that can be done in these areas is to shave fuzzies with a sharp blade. Shaving micarta does NOT make micarta look properly finished. It is still fuzzy - just shorter fuzz. Any attempt to sand or buff these areas will make a mess out of the blade coating at these areas.

The only real way to make unfinished micarta look decent is to remove the scales from the knife, finish them (sand and buff) and put them back on. That is WAY more work for me than I should have to do - it SHOULD be done at Wauson! It should only take them a few more minutes! - as they can do it prior to attaching the scales.

So, I don't consider the fuzz easy to deal with - As I want it done RIGHT! Obviously, some will just shave off a few loose pieces of fuzz and call it a day. But, I do NOT consider that properly finished micarta. And I don't like that Swamp Rat is providing a lesser quality product to save a few minutes worth of work. I consider that being cheap and shorting customers.

I still like Swamp Rat knives. Great steel and good designs. But, I find it frustrating to pay these prices and have to view any micarta handled knife as an extensive project after just paying big bucks for what should be a new and properly finished knife.

I "STRONGLY" feel that Swamp Rat NEEDS to go back to the level of quality of micarta like the earlier Ratweilers, Rat Mastiff, etc. and back to "Finishing" the micarta scales.

Or start providing us with "Kits" as mentioned above! - At significant discounts!

Or go back to using Res-C on Swamp Rats. If you remember, we are paying a LOT more for the micarta over the Res-C. Again, to pay this premium for micarta, it should not only be "Finished" micarta, but "WELL" finished premium micarta!

The Res-C Camp Tramp was issued at $128.95.
The Micarta handled Ratweiler was at $178.95.
The Chopweiler (micarta) was at $198.95.
The Chopweiler (G10) was at $218.95

$50 - $70 more for sub-standard micarta finish!!! and $90 more for G10!!!

If I can get "complete" knives for $50 - $70 from other makers with much nicer finished micarta than recent Swamp Rat knives (quality of steel not being relevant), then how come Swamp Rat can't at least provide VERY nicely finished micarta for $50 - $70 more than Res-C?

If we are going to pay for these kinds of price jacks, I SURELY want the micarta to be VERY NICE!!!!! - or just bring back Res-C......

.
 
I don't have the SBR, but the regular coated Battle Rat weighs less than either the Ratweiler or Chopweiler and would likely have just a slight advantage in chopping power with it's longer blade.



Here are some specs:

SS4........................= 5.5 ounces; .200" thick ; 4.25" blade; 9" oal
Bog Dog..................= 5.0 ounces; .140" thick ; 4.75" blade; 9.56" oal

HRLM.......................= 9.0 ounces; .190" thick; 4.13" blade; 9.3" oal
Yard Keeper LE..........= 7.5 ounces; .268" thick; 4.5" blade; 9" oal
Howler (Res-C)..........= 6.0 ounces; .188" thick; 4.5" blade; 9" oal

Desert Jack (stripped).= 10.0 ounces; .175” thick; 6.0” blade; 11.25” oal
Ratmandu (G10).........= 11.0 ounces; .190" thick; 5.3125" blade; 10.5" oal
Ratmandu (micarta)....= 10.0 ounces; .190" thick; 5.3125" blade; 10.5" oal
DM..........................= 9.0 ounces; .268" thick; 5.25" blade; 9.75" oal

M6..........................= 16.2 ounces; .235" thick; 6" blade; 11.68" oal
Scrapper 6 LE...........= 12.7 ounces; .268" thick; 6.25" blade; 11.44" oal

Yard Guard..............= 16.0 ounces; .277" thick; 7.25" blade; 12.4" oal
Camp Tramp............= 14.5 ounces; .236" thick; 7.325" blade; 12.5" oal
Ratweiler (orig.)……. = 20.1 ounces; .25” thick; 7.5” blade; 13” oal
Chopweiler - Micarta = 19.1 ounces; .25” thick; 7.5625” blade; 13.1875” oal
Chopweiler – G10….. = 20.5 ounces; .25” thick; 7.5625” blade; 13.1875” oal

Dog Father………….. = 20.1 ounces; .275” thick; 10” blade; 15.125” oal
Dog Father LE…….. = 17.0 ounces; .250” thick; 10” blade; 15.125” oal
Battle Rat……………. = 16.5 ounces; .250” thick; 9.375” blade; 14.5” oal
 
Whichever knife you ultimately decide to purchase... trust me... it won't be your last busse family knife. They are fantastic products. My first taste of Kool-aid was on the lower end of the Busse scale with a Scrap Yard Dumpster mutt. That led to the purchase of a dogfather... and then some Swamp Rats... and then a whole lot of Busse's. I guess you could say that I kinda tested the waters before diving in. ;)

My advice... if I may be so presumptuous... is to call your credit card company and increase your limit! :D These knives are an incredible value for the quality you receive!:thumbup:

This has been a great thread!!! Well done to all.
Like kdstrick said "it won't be your last busse family knife".:thumbup:
Enjoy!!!
 
Pretty strong words there DWRW, may be you need to step back and take a deep breath and mellow a little, its not the end of the world.

If you dont like em dont buy em, more for us.

IF you want Res C, check out the Scrap Yard, you'll be a happy camper.

EDIT to add: You can use foul language thinly veiled in dollar signs, but its still foul language and unacceptable, the playground is around the corner in Whine n Cheese, you can use all the foul mouthed mess you want there. Please keep it out of here.
 
You can use foul language thinly veiled in dollar signs, but its still foul language and unacceptable, the playground is around the corner in Whine n Cheese, you can use all the foul mouthed mess you want there. Please keep it out of here.

I consider my use of one such thinly veiled word to be a minor infraction.
I assume you pointed it out because you might be more offended by my other comments. But, in any case, foul langauge is generally not appreciated by myself either. Sorry to offend on that front - so, I edited.
 
So, to put it in plain speak it *looks* as though the BR is a slightly larger version of the CT (2.0 ozs. heavier, 2.0" length). Would this be a fair assessment, or am I missing something? I found a picture of both side by side, they look incredibly similar except for size.
 
So, to put it in plain speak it *looks* as though the BR is a slightly larger version of the CT (2.0 ozs. heavier, 2.0" length). Would this be a fair assessment, or am I missing something? I found a picture of both side by side, they look incredibly similar except for size.


Yes. Sorry for not answering completely. The Battle Rat is basically just a longer version of the Camp Tramp. Same blade height, thickness and general shape, just longer.

The Ratweiler is mostly a full tang & micarta handled version of the Camp Tramp, but adds the thumb ramp - and obviously the different shape of the handle - two different "finish" levels of the Ratweiler's scales were made.

.
 
Yes. Sorry for not answering completely. The Battle Rat is basically just a longer version of the Camp Tramp. Same blade height, thickness and general shape, just longer.

The Ratweiler is mostly a full tang & micarta handled version of the Camp Tramp, but adds the thumb ramp - and obviously the different shape of the handle - two different "finish" levels of the Ratweiler's scales were made.

.

Not really. The BR is quite a bit bigger. Two inches to be exact. Here are the specs:

CT - Blade length = 7.5", 12.5" overall length

BR - Blade length = 9.5", 14.5 overall length

The BR is pretty much a dedicated chopper given the extra length. It also sports a slightly narrower blade HEIGHT. The CT is a little broader in this aspect. You can see it in the attached pic. I'm not sure about weight differences. The CT is more of an all-arounder given it's design. Both are great.

The blades pictured are:

Uncle Mini Mojo
Camp Tramp
Chopweiler
Battle Rat

attachment.php
 
Pretty strong words there DWRW, may be you need to step back and take a deep breath and mellow a little, its not the end of the world.

If you dont like em dont buy em, more for us.

IF you want Res C, check out the Scrap Yard, you'll be a happy camper.


...... But, I am not really going to apologize about my other comments.

That is how I feel about it.

Granted, my feelings are largely based on frustration. But, I feel my frustration is justified.

I am a knife enthusiast and avid knife collector. I am "passionate" about my hobby.
I "DO" like Swamp Rat knives...... that is why it frustrates me to see this type of "cut" in quality and effort to provide at least par quality scales.

I like "working" knives, but I still want a nice level of finish.

Nothing personal Leatherman. I know you have been around here a long time and well respected on these forums. But, I am NOT new around Swamp Rat either.

However, I DO call things like I see them.
Whereas, your comments "Could" possibly be biased (even if subconsciously) since you do earn income off of selling sheaths for Busse knives.
Or maybe lesser quality scales just doesn't bother you - fine and fair enough..... I guess.. (????? - :confused:)

But, let's put it in a different perspective.

Since you make leather sheaths and sell to customers. (And very fine quality sheaths at that. I have seen your work and I don't blow smoke to appease you. If you make a quality product, I will call it a quality product. I have given all kinds of accolades to Swamp Rat over quite a few years. I am just unhappy with recent micarta and speak my mind with hopes of helping change for improvements in the future.).......

How would Swamp Rat DOWN-grading the finish of their micarta handles be much different than you selling sheaths where you don't sand the sides of the sandwhiched leather to flat (- Just leave them nice and ratty) - and maybe don't stain the sides of the leather while you are at it?

Would you expect your customers to complain?

Would you be satisfied with providing that level of product?

Would you tell your customers: "I agree with you that the older ones look much better, but with a cost/price ratio to stay with it was much easier to simplify the process.
The unfinished sides of my sheaths are actually so easy to deal with I dont see a need for the shop to sit and sand them and finish them, I'd rather ship my sheaths quicker." ???????? :confused:

Your sheaths, whether they get used or not, are built tough and still have a fine level of finish.

How can you make a product yourself especially leather sheaths and put the effort into the finish quality that you do, imply that Swamp Rat's lack of finish in their recent micarta handles is really up to your expectations?

I would have a hard time believing that you, with at least as much familiarity with other knives and micarta around the industry, would honestly consider some of Swamp Rat's recent micarta scales up to industry par.

I like SR-101. I like Swamp Rat designs. I am just dissappointed that the quality of finish has dropped.

Honestly, although I would have been dissappointed in the "DOWN-grading done to Swamp Rat scales anyway. I am still (years later - sorry for the long term grudge) dissappointed in how I received my Ratweiler.

I had one of the original Ratweiler's. But, mine came from the final run of the Ratweilers. I was VERY dissappointed when I received my Ratweiler - as Swamp Rat had changed the handles on the Ratweilers to a much lesser quality of finish. I was even more annoyed because they had done this without giving ANY notice to anybody that it was going to be changed. They just shipped the last orders with the new "Lesser" quality handle. There were PLENTY of pictures all over the place with a certain type of handle and then I (and others) recieved a much lower level of quality handle on the final run!

I am generally a big advocate of Busse customer service. But, I was honestly very let down and un-impressed by how the Ratweiler handle change happened.
I contacted Eric about it. I had dealt/talked with Eric about things prior to this with always positive experience and respect for how Eric handled situations. (* For the record, I have spoke with him since and have seen how he handles other situations on the forums and I do believe Eric to be an upstanding person with good intent.) But, when I explained my frustration about the final run of Ratweiler handles, he said I was more than welcome to send the knife back. But, he didn't have any of the early handle designs and that was it.
So, while he was very agreeable to taking the knife back if I didn't want it, I still was unable to get a knife as I had intended to buy, as I had paid for, as I wanted and as I was led to believe I would get. There was no explanation or apology in regards to the un-announced and inappropriate DOWN-grade in the Ratweiler scales. I think this was handled wrong - .... no pun intended.

But, I don't think it was all Eric's fault. And aside from this one exception, I still defend Eric as a great guy and worthy of respect. Idoubt he had any say so in the matter (????). It generally just appears that Eric gets what he gets.
But, the Ratweiler's SHOULD have been made the same - OR Busse/Swamp Rat should have notified everyone of the changes prior to taking orders for the final run. And in my STRONG opinion, the final handle run of the Ratweiler was not worthy of the same price as the earlier runs of the Ratweiler.

The earlier Ratweiler handles were nice with nice "full" radiusing and a nice quality of finish on the micarta:

SwampRat-Ratweilerscalesclseearlier.jpg



The final run of Ratweiler scales - with "flat" scales, only radiused at the corners and poor finish quality on the micarta including fuzzy....! ) - Honestly, this next picture looks a lot nicer than my actual Ratweiler scales looked. Mine were very fuzzy. :

SwampRat-Ratweilerflathandlefromfin.jpg




Both Ratweielers were the same price at $178.95
At $50.00 more than the Camp Tramp!
The original Ratweiler scales were worth about $50.00 more (IMO).
When I received my Ratweiler from the final run with final "un-announced" changes to the scales, I was sorely disappointed and sold it very quickly as I did NOT think it was worth $50.00 more than the Camp Tramp.

Because of the ongoing practice of not providing properly finished micarta scales, I would not have purchased the Chopweiler if I could not have purchased with G10 scales. Unfortunately, the G10 still does not have the nice full radius shaping of the scales like the earlier Ratweiler (Rat Mastiff and Rat Daddy), but at least the G10 scales are sufficiently smooth and decent looking finish quality.
but, I had to pay an additional $20.00 premium for the Chopweiler with G10 scales.

The Chopweiler was released at $198.95 - $70.00 more than the Camp Tramp
The Chopweiler G10 was $218.95 - $90.00 more than the Camp Tramp.
These prices are getting very high and very hard to justify.

And yes, I am very familliar with Scrap Yard and I am a very active member on Scrap Yard Forums since they opened as well as at Rat Chat for many years now.

I really like my Chopweiler (G10), RMD (G10) and HRLM from recent releases, but with these increases in prices, Swamp Rat is going to have to be dead-on with designs and probably going to have to keep offering G10 or improve their micarta. Or I am going to have a hard time justifying the purchases.

I don't buy Swamp Rat or even Scrap Yard or the odd high dollar Busse because of the herds or because I can sell it, or because I can sell sheaths for it.

I buy because they are good. - Design and finish quality are part of the decision equation.

In my efforts to get certain little aspects up to par - for products I would like to continue purchasing, I believe, as a consumer, I need to speak my mind about details I wish it to be improved. And then I hope these issues are addressed and improved.

Otherwise, what will be next?


.
 
Not really. The BR is quite a bit bigger. Two inches to be exact. Here are the specs:

CT - Blade length = 7.5", 12.5" overall length

BR - Blade length = 9.5", 14.5 overall length

The BR is pretty much a dedicated chopper given the extra length. It also sports a slightly narrower blade HEIGHT. The CT is a little broader in this aspect. You can see it in the attached pic. I'm not sure about weight differences. The CT is more of an all-arounder given it's design. Both are great.

The blades pictured are:

Uncle Mini Mojo
Camp Tramp
Chopweiler
Battle Rat

attachment.php



I am not so sure why I am having to defend my comments so much today, but YES, the BR is pretty much just a "LONGER" version of the CT.

I already posted specs that show the blade and oal of the BR to be 2" longer than the CT.

The BR also weighs 2.0 ounces more than the CT - at least as accurate as my scale is.

I didn't comment on which knife would be better at what. Just specs.

But, yes, the BR is a better chopper and a more dedicated chopper. The CT has it's place as a great and versatile knife (IMO).

They both have a 1.75" blade height.

The difference is ONLY in the length and weight due to the extra 2 inches. They have the same thickness.

As a matter of fact:

If I lay my CT on top of my BR with both tips lined up, the curve at the belly is a perfect match and even the clip has the exact same angle and length.

If I lay the CT on top of BR with handle on top of handle, the handles are obviously the same, but also, the guard, ricasso, plunge line, primary grind, etc. are all the "Exact" same up to about 3.5" on the Camp Tramp when the clip starts - the clip on the BR starts at 5.5" - right at 2" longer than the CT.

I don't know how better to compare the CT to the BR in simple terminology describing physical characteristics (not uses) than to say the BR is a 2 inch longer version of the CT.

.
 
Dude, CAAAAAAAAAAALM DOWN. I think you're beginning to take offense to EVERY comment here. I'm not sure if you know this or not, but it is possible for you, and someone else (in this case me) to be constructing a reply at the same time. I was attempting to be helpful, just like you, by posting the specs that I have for the CT and BR. I was not trying to repeat your info, or force you to defend your data. It was just a timing issue. Nothing more, nothing less. I've seen you post here fairly often, usually with extensive information that is very helpful. That said, you should be aware of the often EXTREME loyalty that Busse/Rat/Scrap fans show for these blades. Nobody is questioning your loyalty or knowledge or how long you've been a member of the forum. We all have our own opinions and are entitled to them equally. Sure we rib each other a bunch, but in the end this forum is all about our interest in Busse family knives. Sure there are folks that chime in from time to time to bash us or Jerry's knives. That's their prerogative. It's the essence of fanatacism. We like ours, they like theirs, and sometimes that causes arguments even between camps. Let's all take a step back and continue this thread as it is extremely informative. That's what it's all about. Thanks for indulging me.
 
DWRW said:

This is the one thing I don't like about my original Ratweiler. The middle tubing sits flush and/or even a little above the scales. My RatDaddy and RatMastiff have nice, recessed tube connectors. On the RW, it doesn't affect function, but my middle finger tends to land there, so I feel it.

tenman, if you want to get together sometime and try out some Rats, let me know. Things are freaky busy right now, but I might be able to squeeze out some time one afternoon. Let's see, I've got a Rat Warden, HRLM, Safari Skinner, Ratmandu, Ratweiler, Chopweiler, Battle Rat, Rat Mastiff, Rat Daddy, Crash Axe.

I too highly recommend a Chopweiler to go with the HRLM.

SwampRats.jpg


ChopweilerWarden2.jpg
 
Back
Top