- Joined
- Feb 28, 2003
- Messages
- 19,863
ever wonder what the difference are from old and new?
really? yah, right
well, i took the handles off a nearly 30 yo Cincinnati Machax (#20 written on handle? mmm) and traced out...
then did the same with a Kabar 2012 stamped model overlayed on the CinCinn...
weighed the naked blades. measured thickness too. length too, indirectly via graph paper at 1/4 inch squares...
results?
full size, for the morbidly curious: http://perspicuityphotos.smugmug.com/Woodworking/Beckers/i-GkZXCnR/0/O/9026-crop.jpg
for those not into looking at the picture, and reading my handwritiing...
+ bolt holes the same, major top angles and dog leg the same...
+ CinCinn is about 1/4 inch longer, and had a bit more belly up front; (more in handle too)
Funny note: the CinCinn bolt hardware is parkerized apparently, and the outer bolts (#1 and #3) are ground down and thus shorter than #2! don't mix them up!
As well, they appear to have been coated after grinding!
Handle material is Estaloc, and isn't 1:1 with the new handles.
+ KaBar has the pommel of course; and two cut outs in the handle naturally; there's small swedge at the front angle, making it more like a Warrior model of old, but that takes away forward weight as well.
+ CinCinn #20: 0.2180 thick (phosphate coated) and 17.0 ounces
+ KaBar 2012: 0.1950 thick (with smooth coating) and 12.75 ounces
0.023 inches DIFFERENT!
4.25 ounces DIFFERENT! the CinCinn is heavier and more forward weighted esp.
+ for Science!
discuss!!!
really? yah, right

well, i took the handles off a nearly 30 yo Cincinnati Machax (#20 written on handle? mmm) and traced out...
then did the same with a Kabar 2012 stamped model overlayed on the CinCinn...
weighed the naked blades. measured thickness too. length too, indirectly via graph paper at 1/4 inch squares...
results?

full size, for the morbidly curious: http://perspicuityphotos.smugmug.com/Woodworking/Beckers/i-GkZXCnR/0/O/9026-crop.jpg
for those not into looking at the picture, and reading my handwritiing...
+ bolt holes the same, major top angles and dog leg the same...
+ CinCinn is about 1/4 inch longer, and had a bit more belly up front; (more in handle too)
Funny note: the CinCinn bolt hardware is parkerized apparently, and the outer bolts (#1 and #3) are ground down and thus shorter than #2! don't mix them up!
As well, they appear to have been coated after grinding!
Handle material is Estaloc, and isn't 1:1 with the new handles.
+ KaBar has the pommel of course; and two cut outs in the handle naturally; there's small swedge at the front angle, making it more like a Warrior model of old, but that takes away forward weight as well.
+ CinCinn #20: 0.2180 thick (phosphate coated) and 17.0 ounces
+ KaBar 2012: 0.1950 thick (with smooth coating) and 12.75 ounces
0.023 inches DIFFERENT!
4.25 ounces DIFFERENT! the CinCinn is heavier and more forward weighted esp.
+ for Science!
discuss!!!
Last edited: