It's kind of interesting that we have kind of a similar situation here in the States with the guy in New York City who decided to use a paving stone for it's unintended purpose. Chances are, the sword that was used was never intended to be used as such, and was probably more of a wall hanger then anything else. The stone on the other hand, was well, a stone. It reminds me of when I used to be a counselor at a men's homeless shelter. The guys used to have to check in their pocket knives, and it finally reached a point (where I completely disagreed with the policy) where they had to check in their fingernail clippers because they too were "weapons" by some stretch of some superiors tiny (and apparently unchallenged) imagination. Funny thing is, we had a soda machine in the cafeteria/meeting room/sleeping room that dispensed aluminum cans of course. It didn't take a mental giant to figure out that you can take a can, flatten it, give it a nice point and stick people with it, MUCH more effectively then a fingernail clipper. Also, we had railroad tracks that ran behind the building, chock full of railroad spikes that were used on the tracks. Those too became a popular carrying implement as well, and I've witnessed what happens when a spike contacts a human skull, and it ain't too pretty. Not to mention all the sundry sticks, and rocks, and bottles, that could be found around the building. Anyhow, here's the moral of this (I knew there had to be one somewhere here
), and I wish people could get it through their media hyped brains: Even if you ban every gun, every sword, every knife, every fingernail clipper, and every aluminum can, there will still be "weapons" that can be found ANY place you are. People have been quite adept at making other people bleed long before the invention of gunpowder, and long before the invention of steel. I don't see it leaving our nature anytime soon in our development. We can always ban objects, but it's not until we ban the behavior that we're going to get anyplace in this whole mess. Demonizing objects to me basically means that we have completely lost control of a situation, and more importantly, the behavior of people commiting the acts. But, it does give a (false) sense of security to those out there that have the media hyped (lack of) brains. If there ever was a time for the ghost of Mr. Jefferson to return, it's now. May we hope for a miracle.
Take care,
John Johnson
"It takes a village to ruin a child."