- Joined
- Oct 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,424
Unfortunately the answer is: It depends.
If it's interior mammoth from Mark, it'll work consistently and easily. It's not as butter smooth to work with as interior elephant, but it's close. As I said about though, and it applies to both interior and bark, it all depends on the age, and condition of the ivory. There's no guarantee of consistency, when dealing with material of so many variables, age, location it was procured, mineralization level, contact with other minerals, moisture content, and decay. It's the same with bark, but yes, they can be different, it's not uncommon to find some really hard or brittle bark, but that seems less common with interior, but I think there's a higher level of discretion about what's really "usable" when it comes to interior material.
Stuff from Alaska can be very different than stuff from Siberia, but so can two pieces from the same vendor, that may be thousands of years apart in age, hardness, etc.
However, it's nothing like the extreme difference of antler pith and bark. Hope that answers your question somewhat, although I know it's far from a simple, or definite, explanation.
If it's interior mammoth from Mark, it'll work consistently and easily. It's not as butter smooth to work with as interior elephant, but it's close. As I said about though, and it applies to both interior and bark, it all depends on the age, and condition of the ivory. There's no guarantee of consistency, when dealing with material of so many variables, age, location it was procured, mineralization level, contact with other minerals, moisture content, and decay. It's the same with bark, but yes, they can be different, it's not uncommon to find some really hard or brittle bark, but that seems less common with interior, but I think there's a higher level of discretion about what's really "usable" when it comes to interior material.
Stuff from Alaska can be very different than stuff from Siberia, but so can two pieces from the same vendor, that may be thousands of years apart in age, hardness, etc.
However, it's nothing like the extreme difference of antler pith and bark. Hope that answers your question somewhat, although I know it's far from a simple, or definite, explanation.