Seriously, the original Manix -- especially the large, plain-edged version that the OP likes -- is an incredible knife.
The blade is a bit shorter than the Military, but it's wider and stouter, while being an excellent slicer.
The widest part of the spine on my BG-42 Military is 0.1430 inches.
The widest part of the spine on my S30V Manix is 0.1560 inches.
But the Manix blade is wider, so because both are full flat grind, the Manix gains a little back as a slicer, while retaining a large strength advantage. The elongated, leaf-shaped blade is a functional compromise between the long, pointy Military-style blade and a full-blown leaf blade. The Manix blade cuts extremely well and gives you a lot of leverage in three dimensions while cutting.
I've reprofiled both blades to 30 degrees (15 dps). The Military has edge shoulders of 0.0260 inches. The Manix is 0.0295 inches. Both have nice tips, but the Military is more pointy. The Manix tip is more stout. Both are good for detail work, but the Military has the edge there.
My Manix locks up as solid as a rock. No blade play. The lockback is easy to use, and locks up with a solid clack. The lockback lever is cut from 0.1610-inch steel. Very solid.
The only drawback to the Manix is its width. Pocket carry suffers a bit because of that width, but its performance is enhanced by the width, too.
The Manix is a simple, elegant design, lacking jimping and other needless design features. It came with some wide jimping at the thumb ramp, but I ground that jimping off because it cut my hand when I had to reach into my pocket. The Manix is jealous of its pocket space and defends it. With the jimping smoothed out, it's much nicer to use. The handle is so ergonomic -- with both a handle choil and a blade choil -- that no jimping it needed to keep it secure in the hand. The ergos allow you to crank on heavy cutting and do delicate detail work. Just a great design.
When the Manix first came out years ago, Bladeforums was abuzz over this amazing knife. Sad to see that sales to average customers weren't enough to keep it in production, but it's an absolutely wonderful knife. The Manix II is obviously more popular with the masses, but it lacks the imposing size and power of the original Manix, and it's, in my opinion, blemished by all the jimping and design bells and whistles. Should have a different name.
And the original Manix should get a little factory love with a sprint run in CPM M4 or M390.
Thanks to CWdotson (the OP) for showing a great knife some well-deserved respect.
The blade is a bit shorter than the Military, but it's wider and stouter, while being an excellent slicer.
The widest part of the spine on my BG-42 Military is 0.1430 inches.
The widest part of the spine on my S30V Manix is 0.1560 inches.
But the Manix blade is wider, so because both are full flat grind, the Manix gains a little back as a slicer, while retaining a large strength advantage. The elongated, leaf-shaped blade is a functional compromise between the long, pointy Military-style blade and a full-blown leaf blade. The Manix blade cuts extremely well and gives you a lot of leverage in three dimensions while cutting.
I've reprofiled both blades to 30 degrees (15 dps). The Military has edge shoulders of 0.0260 inches. The Manix is 0.0295 inches. Both have nice tips, but the Military is more pointy. The Manix tip is more stout. Both are good for detail work, but the Military has the edge there.
My Manix locks up as solid as a rock. No blade play. The lockback is easy to use, and locks up with a solid clack. The lockback lever is cut from 0.1610-inch steel. Very solid.
The only drawback to the Manix is its width. Pocket carry suffers a bit because of that width, but its performance is enhanced by the width, too.
The Manix is a simple, elegant design, lacking jimping and other needless design features. It came with some wide jimping at the thumb ramp, but I ground that jimping off because it cut my hand when I had to reach into my pocket. The Manix is jealous of its pocket space and defends it. With the jimping smoothed out, it's much nicer to use. The handle is so ergonomic -- with both a handle choil and a blade choil -- that no jimping it needed to keep it secure in the hand. The ergos allow you to crank on heavy cutting and do delicate detail work. Just a great design.
When the Manix first came out years ago, Bladeforums was abuzz over this amazing knife. Sad to see that sales to average customers weren't enough to keep it in production, but it's an absolutely wonderful knife. The Manix II is obviously more popular with the masses, but it lacks the imposing size and power of the original Manix, and it's, in my opinion, blemished by all the jimping and design bells and whistles. Should have a different name.
And the original Manix should get a little factory love with a sprint run in CPM M4 or M390.
Thanks to CWdotson (the OP) for showing a great knife some well-deserved respect.



