Meta - First Complainer

Feedback: +0 / =0 / -0
Joined
Dec 27, 2001
Messages
108
Ok, I admit to stealing Cougar's idea for the thread title.

It seems that when member ABC posts about a transaction with XYZ gone awry, there are about a half dozen or so posts, BEFORE the alleged offender XYZ has a chance to reply, that go something like this:

"ABC is a swell guy. You better make this right, XYZ, you jerk, or your reputation here is ruined forever."

Then, of course, XYZ notices that he's being dragged through the mud and replies with some additional information that really changes the tone of the story. Of course, anyone who already supported ABC after hearing one side of the story has three choices: 1) shut up; 2) admit their judgement was hasty; 3) bash XYZ. Unfortunately, option 3 is chosen too often (which is to say, more than never).

So, I have three suggestions:

1. Wait a few days before you jump on XYZ, give him a chance to respond. If you really want to engage in a slam-fest you can always bring the thread bttt later. (I can't believe I'm discouraging hot-tempered threads, they're my favorite!)

2. If you are the seller, take a picture of the knife as you're putting it into the box to prove what condition it was in the day you shipped it.

3. If you are the buyer, remember that the reason you're buying from a private party instead of a dealer is to save a few bucks. Dealers cost more but they are insured, can write off a loss, and more willing to "make things right," even when the buyer make a fishy claim. I think a lot of knives are highly overpriced at the retail level. But if you want the security of working with a real dealer then you gotta pay the premium. You're taking a risk by buying on the cheap. If you can't take the consequences then don't even try.
 
Good suggestions!

By the way, I have no copyright on the word meta. It's used all over the net -- a meta discussion is a discussion about how the discussion should be conducted.
 
I don't know if rational thinking will really fly here...but one can always hope! :D

Good idea and it would lessen the tension that builds up so fast on posts like those...
G2
 
Great ideas hd2k_va,

There always seems to be a few that have to jump in and start posting whether they are involved or not. It usually ends up clouding the original issue altogethar. Just because one person has had good dealings with "XYZ" does not mean that everyone will. Nobody's perfect. It's not really helping the individual situation by posting that you've never had a problem with "XYZ". The only time those posts are really helpful are if a person has a question about an individual before a deal. It dosen't matter much after there is a potential problem. Things happen and things get screwed up.
Most of the time it's just a simple miscommunication. I really don't think anyone is out to intentionally get someone although there are rare circumstances. You have to look at each situation on it's own and after the facts are all there (rarely happens) make your decision.

I've gone on long enough :D

Mer
 
Back
Top